|
October 08, 2010
Political Dynasty? Or American Dream? (The choice is yours.)
This morning Glenn Reynolds linked the Blog Prof's discussion of the race between political titan John Dingell, Obamacare sponsor and lifetime advocate of socialized medicine, and Dr. Rob Steele, a cardiologist who has had enough of what's happening and decided to run for Congress. OK, Dingell happens to be my congressman, and FWIW, I wrote to him about Obamacare. Even though he is a longtime Democrat (he's so old that his political life in Washington literally dates back to FDR), voters in his Detroit area district are fed up with him. Quite an accomplishment if you consider that the area is about as heavily Democrat as it's possible to get. Not only is Detroit itself 96.93% Democrat, but Ann Arbor is to the left of almost anyplace but Berkeley and Cuba (and these days I'm not so sure about the "political reliability" of Cuba). The polls must be a shocker for Dingell: A new independent poll has the dean of the U.S. House, Rep. John Dingell trailing his Republican opponent, Rob Steele, by 4 percentage points.The Blog Prof has a great collection of YouTube videos, and for those who can stand to watch them, they show how hard Dingell has worked to earn the wrath of his voting constituents. Dingell did all of the following: Sheesh. I guess he thinks I'm part of the KKK too, as I'm one of those annoying Tea Partiers. The Blog Prof concludes that it's"time to put Dingell in the Smithsonian where he belongs," and urges a donation to Dr. Steele. I have met Dr. Steele, and I think he would be a great congressman. I donated to his campaign, and I would urge any readers who agree with me to donate too. To see Dingell and the Dingell Dynasty being defeated by a doctor who is fed up by Obamacare and decided to run for office is true poetic justice. If socialized medicine makes you sick (as it does me) I can think of no better medicine than electing Dr. Steele. The Blog Prof has assembled such a damning collection of videos that I would normally have just ended the post here. However, I thought I should add a few thoughts, especially in light of a political mailer I received the other day. Here it is: It's "Paid for by the John B. Dingell for Congress Committee." The grand patriarch of the ruling Dingell Dynasty seems to think that all he needs to do to get elected is run a snarky campaign against the Tea Party. On the other side of the leaflet is a pathetic attempt to smear Dr. Steele for being wealthy. The Dingell Dynasty has indicted him for his wickedness in owning a nice house and a vintage car collection. Sorry, but that won't fly with me. In fact, it backfired big time; hence this lengthened post. Steele is a man who worked for many years as a cardiologist in the private sector, and God knows how many lives he has saved. In this country, people who work hard and achieve success in a demanding profession like that are supposed to enjoy what is called the American Dream. Is there something wrong with that? Or is it more virtuous for great wealth to be obtained at the taxpayers' expense? Dingell is one of the wealthiest members of Congress, and the fortune he has amassed does not include that of his heiress wife: Last November, The Detroit News reported that Dingell is the wealthiest member of the Michigan delegation, with a net worth of about $2.6 million, not including the assets of his heiress wife Debbie, who has been quite successful as a Washington lobbyist (often on issues under her husband's jurisdiction).Normally, politicians' spouses are considered off-limits, but Debbie Dingell is anything but a normal spouse. To call them a power couple would be understatement; their names routinely appeared on lists like this of top Washington power couples. For years it was a very nice arrangement: Naturally, there has long been talk of her being her husband's political heir and successor. But in order for that to happen, the Dingell Dynasty must go on. How nice it would be for a doctor who earned his wealth and was fed up with Obama-Dingellcare to put an end to the sort of arrangement that should have gone out of style in 1776. Regular readers know that I dislike criticizing people for being rich, and I hold no grudge against Debbie Dingell for her status as Fisher Body fortune heiress. However, fair is fair, and if the Dingells are going to attack a self-made man who earned the American Dream, I have a question for them as a taxpayer. How much money did Debbie Dingell get when she left GM last year and took a buyout? Was any of this buyout funded by the bailout? Because if any of it came from the taxpayers, I think the taxpayers have a right to know about it -- especially because it makes their smear against Dr. Steele worthy of recognition for setting a new height in political hypocrisy. You don't have to be a conservative, a Republican, or a Tea Partier to be fed up to the point of outrage by such stuff. Lots of Democrats around here are supporting Dr. Steele. Rule by political dynasty should have gone out of style long ago, and I agree that Dingell and his Dingell dynasty belong in the Smithsonian museum. Better yet, the ash heap of history. That way the taxpayers wouldn't have to pay for the space. UPDATE: Many thanks to Glenn Reynolds for the link, and a warm welcome to all. Comments welcome, agree or disagree. I'm still mulling over the idea that I should "keep quiet on stuff like this and let them finish their self-immolation." The problem with that is that in the election coverage, so far, the media is keeping awfully quiet about the Dingells' wealth. posted by Eric on 10.08.10 at 11:41 AM
Comments
I received the same mailer. I found it funny, since it serves equally well as a rallying poster for Tea Party voters. Phil T. B. · October 8, 2010 04:10 PM Phil, I had the same thought. Looks like an own goal to me. M. Simon · October 8, 2010 06:33 PM I have revised and extended my remarks: http://powerandcontrol.blogspot.com/2010/10/smart-politics.html M. Simon · October 8, 2010 09:03 PM At one time, Mr. Dingell was my congressman. I was more interested at the time in coercing the extremely local benevolent dictatorship into giving me more animal crackers, or failing that, pureed carrots. Perhaps if I'd cared more about others at the time, I might have used the power of the Toddler Voice to save the residents of Detroit from cracked up city sidewalks, and a pureed city they have to endure courtesy of men like Mr. Dingell. But beware, if you choose to sacrifice his future by voting for the past, there might be a more far-sighted toddler in the city now, ready to get down! Tennwriter · October 9, 2010 11:19 AM I used to be somewhat skeptical about term limiting US legislators. But the constant lying and whining of the current crop has really ticked me off. If you can term limit the President then you should term limit the rest of them. toad · October 9, 2010 11:34 AM M. Simon · October 9, 2010 11:44 AM STFU!!!!! 3 weeks, just keep quiet on stuff like this and let them finish their self-immolation. Talk up the good guys by all means, but don't give good advice to the other side. They may be deperate aenough to listen. Anyway, it was just one poll and telephone polls like that are not trustworthy even within the claimed statistical bounds, because of serious sample bias. Marty · October 9, 2010 12:12 PM Marty, I see your point, and I have thought about your comment, but I think this stuff is so bad that it ought to be shouted about, and used as a campaign issue. It is outrageous -- so outrageous that I think it is a mistake to say nothing, and let them try for a last minute smear. Dingell has the money to do just that. In politics when you have an opening like this, I think the best defense is a good offense. Besides, the voters are smart enough to see that by attacking Steele for his money, Dingell was really asking for it. Eric Scheie · October 9, 2010 10:35 PM I hadn't realized that flyer (poster?) was supposed to be against the Tea Party, as M. Simon and Phil note, it could be pro-Tea Party. It's funny how two people can look at the same thing, say the same thing and mean exactly the opposite thing. Veeshir · October 10, 2010 08:59 AM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
October 2010
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
October 2010
September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
The Noblest Nobel
It Is Intentional Gipsies, tramps and... socialists???? Facing the Spartan invasion, from an actuarial perspective Is This October? I'm Surprised They Have It All Figured Out We Don't Do Numbahs Only An F? Political Dynasty? Or American Dream? (The choice is yours.) Some American Music
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Your "political reliability" of Cuba bit had me LMAO. In a time long ago at a place far away I was a communist - that phrase resonates.