|
January 15, 2010
The conspiracy theory conspiracy theory
(a call for censorship that wasn't there) I am no fan of Cass Sunstein, but when I read (via a link from M. Simon) that he advocates a government ban on conspiracy theories, I nearly blew a gasket. After all, the man is often said to be a serious contender for nomination to the Supreme Court. Here is what Sunstein is reported as having said: In a lengthy academic paper, President Obama's regulatory czar, Cass Sunstein, argued the U.S. government should ban "conspiracy theorizing."OK, I know it gets tired, but that's what WorldNetDaily reported. Tired as I am of debunking conspiracy theories (or, in this case, a conspiracy theory conspiracy theory), I downloaded and read Cass Sunstein's paper. He does not argue that the U.S. government should ban conspiracy theories. He considers it for the sake of argument and specifically rejects it as inconsistent with freedom of expression as well as self-defeating. Here's a screen shot from page 20: The relevant text reads as follows: The most direct response to a dangerous conspiracy theories is censorship. That response is unavailable in an open society, because it is inconsistent with principles of freedom of expression. We could imagine circumstances in which a conspiracy theory became so pervasive, and so dangerous, that censorship would be thinkable. But in an open society, the need for censorship would be correspondingly reduced. In any case censorship may well turn out to be self-defeating. The effort to censor the theory might well be taken as evidence that the theory is true, and censorship of speech is notoriously difficult.At most, he hypothesizes that censorship might be "thinkable" in less than an open society, but even then he thinks it would be self defeating. Sorry, but I'm just not seeing a call for censorship there. While I have never liked Sunstein's condescending attitude (his proposal for "cognitive infiltration of extremist groups" strikes me as problematic at best), once again WND has tortured the facts, and has come up with a brand new truth, which will no doubt be what its readers want to hear. I realize it's not exciting to say that Sunstein didn't really call for censorship, and now I'm worried that some WND readers might see me as his apologist -- which I don't mean to be. To all who are offended by any appearance I might have conveyed of being a Sunstein apologist, I offer my deepest apologies. MORE: Reason's Jesse Walker critiques what Cass Sunstein actually advocated. Glenn Reynolds characterizes the plan as "CONSPIRE AGAINST THE CONSPIRACY THEORISTS!" As I'm already knee-deep in conspiring against the conspiracy theory conspiracy theory, I guess it would behoove me to conspire against those who conspire against the conspiracy theorists, but hey, I didn't start this and I don't see why I have to engage in counter-counter-conspiracy-theory theorizing. I think Cass Sunstein would have done well to leave this whole thing alone. People who want to believe things are going to go looking for what they want to believe, and the people who give them what they want to believe are going to keep right on giving. Hmmm... I realize it will sound like another conspiracy theory, but in my darker moments, I often suspect that many so-called "conspiracy theories" are deliberately manufactured by relatively intelligent troll types to entertain or mislead dumber or more gullible audiences. posted by Eric on 01.15.10 at 12:00 PM
Comments
I think that saying that someone advocates a ban on conspiracy theories when he does not falls within conspiracy theorizing. That it's what the intended audience wants to believe will of course help popularize it. Wanting to believe is a common driving force. Eric Scheie · January 15, 2010 01:06 PM I should add that I think the term "conspiracy theory" is overused, and the title of the post is somewhat tongue-in cheek. Eric Scheie · January 15, 2010 01:20 PM WND unfortunately often seems to play fast and loose with the facts. Joe Lammers · January 15, 2010 02:07 PM What WND has become is so sad. I followed them in the early days (around 2000 IIRC) and they were a fairly good information source. Joe Farrah (the editor) was sensible on the drug war and insane about gays. But overall a fairly good information source. It kinda turned when he did a stunt (a 13 year old columnist?) and turned the site into a book pushing machine for his writers. Now a days? They can't be trusted. And Eric - thanks for debunking the whole conspiracy theory conspiracy. M. Simon · January 15, 2010 04:48 PM I think you're right M. Simon, right around when he had the 13 year old columnist is when I stopped reading too.
And some are correct, think about the "crazies" in the 60s and 70s who were warning us about the left's infiltration of higher ed and the media and what it would mean for the country. Makes you wonder what really is at Area 57, doesn't it? Veeshir · January 15, 2010 06:26 PM It should be obvious that this whole business is a conspiracy to make Cass Sunstein look good. Bleepless · January 15, 2010 06:40 PM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
January 2010
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
January 2010
December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Grass roots convention, minus the grass roots?
Why I'm glad Pat Robertson isn't a Commie Nerd Night Report Announcement..... It isn't every day that I don't have to hold my nose... US government gives bin Laden a Commie hairdo The conspiracy theory conspiracy theory (a call for censorship that wasn't there) Are we living on an angry red planet that wants to be green? A Scientific Hypothesis Gone Bad Diddlin With The Data
Links
Site Credits
|
|
So, you're saying that Cass Sunstein's call to stamp out conspiracy theories... is a conspiracy theory?
... Ow. My brain just cried.