The conspiracy theory conspiracy theory
(a call for censorship that wasn't there)

I am no fan of Cass Sunstein, but when I read (via a link from M. Simon) that he advocates a government ban on conspiracy theories, I nearly blew a gasket. After all, the man is often said to be a serious contender for nomination to the Supreme Court.

Here is what Sunstein is reported as having said:

In a lengthy academic paper, President Obama's regulatory czar, Cass Sunstein, argued the U.S. government should ban "conspiracy theorizing."

Among the beliefs Sunstein would ban is advocating that the theory of global warming is a deliberate fraud.

Sunstein also recommended the government send agents to infiltrate "extremists who supply conspiracy theories" to disrupt the efforts of the "extremists" to propagate their theories.

OK, I know it gets tired, but that's what WorldNetDaily reported. Tired as I am of debunking conspiracy theories (or, in this case, a conspiracy theory conspiracy theory), I downloaded and read Cass Sunstein's paper. He does not argue that the U.S. government should ban conspiracy theories. He considers it for the sake of argument and specifically rejects it as inconsistent with freedom of expression as well as self-defeating. Here's a screen shot from page 20:

SunsteinCensorship_s.JPG

The relevant text reads as follows:

The most direct response to a dangerous conspiracy theories is censorship. That response is unavailable in an open society, because it is inconsistent with principles of freedom of expression. We could imagine circumstances in which a conspiracy theory became so pervasive, and so dangerous, that censorship would be thinkable. But in an open society, the need for censorship would be correspondingly reduced. In any case censorship may well turn out to be self-defeating. The effort to censor the theory might well be taken as evidence that the theory is true, and censorship of speech is notoriously difficult.
At most, he hypothesizes that censorship might be "thinkable" in less than an open society, but even then he thinks it would be self defeating.

Sorry, but I'm just not seeing a call for censorship there.

While I have never liked Sunstein's condescending attitude (his proposal for "cognitive infiltration of extremist groups" strikes me as problematic at best), once again WND has tortured the facts, and has come up with a brand new truth, which will no doubt be what its readers want to hear.

I realize it's not exciting to say that Sunstein didn't really call for censorship, and now I'm worried that some WND readers might see me as his apologist -- which I don't mean to be.

To all who are offended by any appearance I might have conveyed of being a Sunstein apologist, I offer my deepest apologies.

MORE: Reason's Jesse Walker critiques what Cass Sunstein actually advocated. Glenn Reynolds characterizes the plan as "CONSPIRE AGAINST THE CONSPIRACY THEORISTS!"

As I'm already knee-deep in conspiring against the conspiracy theory conspiracy theory, I guess it would behoove me to conspire against those who conspire against the conspiracy theorists, but hey, I didn't start this and I don't see why I have to engage in counter-counter-conspiracy-theory theorizing.

I think Cass Sunstein would have done well to leave this whole thing alone. People who want to believe things are going to go looking for what they want to believe, and the people who give them what they want to believe are going to keep right on giving.

Hmmm...

I realize it will sound like another conspiracy theory, but in my darker moments, I often suspect that many so-called "conspiracy theories" are deliberately manufactured by relatively intelligent troll types to entertain or mislead dumber or more gullible audiences.

posted by Eric on 01.15.10 at 12:00 PM





TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://classicalvalues.com/cgi-bin/pings.cgi/9241






Comments

So, you're saying that Cass Sunstein's call to stamp out conspiracy theories... is a conspiracy theory?

... Ow. My brain just cried.

Anonymous   ·  January 15, 2010 12:56 PM

I think that saying that someone advocates a ban on conspiracy theories when he does not falls within conspiracy theorizing.

That it's what the intended audience wants to believe will of course help popularize it.

Wanting to believe is a common driving force.

Eric Scheie   ·  January 15, 2010 01:06 PM

I should add that I think the term "conspiracy theory" is overused, and the title of the post is somewhat tongue-in cheek.

Eric Scheie   ·  January 15, 2010 01:20 PM

WND unfortunately often seems to play fast and loose with the facts.

Joe Lammers   ·  January 15, 2010 02:07 PM

What WND has become is so sad. I followed them in the early days (around 2000 IIRC) and they were a fairly good information source.

Joe Farrah (the editor) was sensible on the drug war and insane about gays. But overall a fairly good information source.

It kinda turned when he did a stunt (a 13 year old columnist?) and turned the site into a book pushing machine for his writers.

Now a days? They can't be trusted.

And Eric - thanks for debunking the whole conspiracy theory conspiracy.

M. Simon   ·  January 15, 2010 04:48 PM

I think you're right M. Simon, right around when he had the 13 year old columnist is when I stopped reading too.
They used to have pretty good columnists, Neil Boortz used to have one.


I have to admit, I have a soft spot for conspiracy theories. I'm very paranoid, (of course I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?), so they cater to my tastes.

And some are correct, think about the "crazies" in the 60s and 70s who were warning us about the left's infiltration of higher ed and the media and what it would mean for the country.

Makes you wonder what really is at Area 57, doesn't it?

Veeshir   ·  January 15, 2010 06:26 PM

It should be obvious that this whole business is a conspiracy to make Cass Sunstein look good.

Bleepless   ·  January 15, 2010 06:40 PM

Post a comment

You may use basic HTML for formatting.





Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)


January 2010
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31            

ANCIENT (AND MODERN)
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR


Search the Site


E-mail



Classics To Go

Classical Values PDA Link



Archives



Recent Entries



Links



Site Credits