|
January 07, 2010
Paranoid flights of fanciful lab rat thinking
I hate it when I voice paranoid suspicions which turn out to be accurate descriptions of official policy, but I guess I better get used to it. In a post titled "Egalitarianism For Asses" on December 27, I worried that there might be "growing tacit acceptance of an absurd proposition" -- that it is better to let people who want to blow themselves up fly and look up everyone's butthole than look up the buttholes only of people who want to blow themselves up.And I asked, Is the goal to move toward a world where people who believe in religious suicide have a right to fly, and to better facilitate this we will all bend over to accommodate them?I thought I was being snarky and sarcastic in a reproachful manner -- making what I thought was a reduction to absurdity. (As in, "surely no sane government would want this, right?") The next day, I speculated that government officials trusted with protecting the public from terrorists are deliberately allowing terrorists to fly, and that they know it: Little wonder they want to imprison air passengers in their seats and make air travel nearly impossible. They have created a monster where they know that there will be terrorists among us, for the simple reason that they know they are bringing them here.Spoken like a paranoid conspiracy theorist, right? But I was engaged in speculation -- making a worst case scenario argument that I really didn't want to be true. But today I read that Detroit bomber Abdulmutallab was in a large database of terrorist supporters who are deliberately being allowed to fly (and who naturally are treated no differently than normal American citizens). All in the name of "national security" doncha know: Abdulmutallab was in a database containing half a million names of people with suspected extremist links but who are not considered threats. Therefore, border security officials would have sought only to question him upon arrival in the U.S., the administration official said.Well isn't that nice? Our rulers think that letting terrorists and people who support suicide bombing get on the planes is just fine, because, you know, they enjoy watching them. And if something happens, well, we the public are all part of their social experiment, and it makes sense to treat everyone equally. What's sarcastic paranoia to me is official policy. As if I needed another reminder, a Palestinian (who apparently lives in Toledo) got on a plane in Miami and couldn't resist making death threats against Jews: MIAMI (AP) -- An airline passenger in Miami proclaimed "I want to kill all the Jews" before police forced him off a Detroit-bound plane, authorities said Thursday.See what I mean? This asshole -- a man who clearly should not be allowed to fly -- is being treated just like someone's angry grandmother who lost her temper. The disturbance forced a taxiing Northwest Airlines flight to turn around at Miami International Airport, according to a news release. Witnesses told investigators who boarded the plane that Asad was loud, disruptive and claimed to be Palestinian.Excuse me, but what is this Palestinian who wants to kill all the Jews doing here in the United States chanting in a foreign language and threatening officers? And why is he allowed to fly on our planes? I'd be willing to bet he'd never get on an El-Al flight. At least the Israelis aren't running a social experiment where they let terrorists and their sympathizers fly. I should stop it with my paranoid speculations, because I right now find myself thinking about lab rats. I'm wondering whether the terrorists who want to kill Americans are regarded as the Alphas, by the social experimenters who regard the rest of us as Betas. Is there any way out of the maze? (Or should I be looking for the right lever to push to get my reward? Nah, they probably think that being part of this glorious experiment in egalitarianism is its own reward.) posted by Eric on 01.07.10 at 11:33 AM
Comments
Adopting the most parody-paranoid persona you can snide up when explaining any government action is the least wrong way to explain it, usually. But being right almost every time you put on that mask can make it sticky, and then it doesn't work anymore. As long as "butthole" can fit in your crazy rants, you're still sane. Paranoids aren't funny (except Charles Manson). guy on internet · January 7, 2010 02:11 PM Seriously, you can't parody them anymore, you can only point and laugh. They just can't let people like that fly into America. Not unless you give himm a full body-cavity search and x-ray and have some air marshall sit next to him. While he's in a strait-jacket and a mouth-guard. Veeshir · January 7, 2010 06:34 PM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
January 2010
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
January 2010
December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
It isn't every day that I don't have to hold my nose...
US government gives bin Laden a Commie hairdo The conspiracy theory conspiracy theory (a call for censorship that wasn't there) Are we living on an angry red planet that wants to be green? A Scientific Hypothesis Gone Bad Diddlin With The Data December Retail Sales Not So Hot NASA Caught Cooking The Books "Sustainability." A rich lecture directed at the poor. Giving the devil his due
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Sorry, but I don't see this as a completely black vs white issue.
Our security people do gain intelligence from observing the activities of suspects so there is some benefit.
To what degree the benefits are worth the risks is a judgment call, one that could change with changing circumstance and experience.
While I too would prefer that flying be free of terrorist risk, I can see sacrificing some short-term risk for long term gain in busting networks.
I do agree that TSA is overdoing the imposition on average citizens to little security effect. They are doing it because they can. Most of these regulations are security theatre.
I'd love to know how many REAL incidents have been caught with the existing processes. I'll beat they are too few.