|
December 28, 2009
Why punish the passengers? (A dumb question....)
I hate to be repetitive, but reading things like the new TSA regulations really burns me up: 1. During flight, the aircraft operator must ensure that the following procedures are followed:(Via Glenn Reynolds.) In other words, the idea is to punish the passengers. Excuse me, but the passengers are the ones who stop the terrorists! So why punish them? Unless the goal is... Oh, I get it. At least, I'm almost tempted to get it. (Except I should probably remember Hanlon's Razor. These days it's tough.) MORE: Glenn Reynolds links Rand Simberg Once again, airline passengers 1, Transportation Security Administration (TSA) 0.And Professor Bainbridge wants to know when we'll rebel: Maybe the terrorists figure they win everytime we in the West spend millions of man-hours being hassled, inconvenienced, and generally put upon by a myriad of stupid security measures.This does call for rebellion. But how? Tea Parties at your local TSA? I also see that some local Detroit area residents claim they witnessed the terrorist being boarded without a passport. But that's no fair! They won't let me board international flights without a passport! Hmmph! You'd think the restrictions they apply to us regular passengers could at least be applied to terrorists. MORE: According to Reuters, the Dutch police are checking out the claim that Abdulmuttallab was allowed to board without a passport. A U.S. couple on the flight, Kurt and Lori Haskell, told Reuters and other news agencies that they saw a tall, well-dressed man aged about 50 with the suspect Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab on Friday morning at Amsterdam's Schiphol Airport.Unlikely? Why? Because Lagos officials are reliable? I think that if he had a passport, it would have been found by now. But if he had a passport and didn't want to show it, that might explain the attempt to escort him through. posted by Eric on 12.28.09 at 11:53 AM
Comments
We should just prohibit civilians from flying. It's obviously much too dangerous for us. Tom · December 28, 2009 12:50 PM Stupidity and malice are identical twins, seldom seen apart. Hanlon's Razor makes people stupid, probably maliciously. guy on internet · December 28, 2009 01:07 PM I thought the best way to catch people is to profile their behavior. People acting suspiciously will be pulled aside. Every cop I know believes in this, and if you read books on intiution (such as Gavin DeBeckers "The Gift of Fear") he explains how you yourself make decisions based on people's behavior. The problem the government has is twofold: 1. I've read complaints that using this catches "too many" drug smugglers and not enough terrorists. You also might catch people doing immoral but not necessarily illegal things. Well so what? I mean I'm against the drug war but I don't see how this is a big problem. 2. Use the word profiling and people immediately assume racism. But I mean profiling behavior not "single guy one way ticket south asian descent" which are just as useless as the other rules since they can be gotten around. I remember in the past reading articles (before the wall) when Israeli police would stop a bomber that he was just acting funny and they stopped him. Maybe he still blew up his bomb but not where he wanted and with minmimal casualties. Anyway I guess in the end the way to stop criminals and terrorists before when they are trying to hide is not easily pared down into rules like TSA tries to. Maybe because they are not exactly hiring brainiacs ("who ever heard of a smart guard?"). But anything based on rules will always punish passengers more than criminals. plutosdad · December 28, 2009 01:37 PM Simple bureaucratic logic in why the passengers are being punished. One, the bomber facilitates an increase in resources and influence by DHS and TSA. Two, passengers interfered with the plane's destruction highlighting both the failures to detect and stop the bomber and that guy on a plane is worth 100,000 DHS employees on the ground. Three, the passengers won't put up much of a fuss but the terrorists are likely to strike somewhere DHS has de-prioritized causing career damage to high-ranking "brilliant" DHS SES or politicals. JKB · December 28, 2009 02:28 PM A reasonable explanation of the "no passport" question could be that the Haskells are mistaken. Eyewitnesses aren't all that reliable in many cases. They could have mistaken the short black man at the Schipol counter for Abdulmutallab, another short black man, especially in light of what they had just gone through on the airplane. This is the most likely explanation as it is very difficult to believe that anyone would have been allowed on board an international flight from a Dutch airport without a passport. liamascorcaigh · December 29, 2009 01:19 PM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
December 2009
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
December 2009
November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
No more art therapy! This time, we mean it!
Terrorist rejected by Britain given visa to U.S. Why punish the passengers? (A dumb question....) Work within the system! For change! egalitarianism for asses Meanwhile in Ann Arbor... Prostitution Services Happy Boxing Day! Merry Christmas! A Free Market In Health Care
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Only thing that's going to work:
Wall off the left seats from the right seats. Women on one side, men on the other. Everyone nude, with no baggage reachable. Every passenger pre-wired with two stun-electrodes glued securely to their scalps. At the first sign of trouble, [bzzzzzzzzzttttt!], and everyone slumps peacefully to the floor. Someone pulls off one electrode, and the other kicks in immediately.
Extra frequent flyer miles if you get stunned and you're not a terrorist.