|
October 14, 2009
Capitalism And Free Press
The Chinese are finding out it's difficult to have one without the other: The future of China's most independent and outspoken publication is in doubt following a mass walkout of its commercial staff and rumours that many members of its editorial team are planning to follow them out of the door. As Jim Pinkerton is wont to proclaim, information wants to be free. Information consumers will naturally migrate their purchases towards reliable, unencumbered sources. This will be an interesting decade in mainland China. The new generation of middle-class Chinese have mostly been successfully indoctrinated with nationalism, but that doesn't mean they will tolerate open repression of popular media figures. It's an open question how much longer the current situation can persist. posted by Dave on 10.14.09 at 01:09 PM
Comments
I teach at a university is SW China; recently we've been doing a textbook unit on personal values. It's interesting some of the blind spots the students have: the difference between nationalism and patriotism is impossible for them to define, they openly question whether the one party system is best but they can't articulate any alternatives and in their essays they frequently state that they have classes in Marxism, but they don't believe in it. The concept of a "loyal opposition" that criticizes the government policy while being loyal to the nation is completely alien to them too, they have great difficulty understanding that. I completely agree with you, it's going to get interesting here. Rob · October 16, 2009 09:27 AM Thanks for your input Rob, very interesting to get a ground-level view, Dave Price · October 16, 2009 12:28 PM I miss the Craig Kilborn Daily Show. He was one funny dude on that show. He was a lefty, but he went after everybody and had a sense of humor. I couldn't take Jon Stewart from the get go, before he was all political. Veeshir · October 17, 2009 06:44 AM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
October 2009
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
October 2009
September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Haven't I Seen This Movie Some Where Before?
Pills and Price-Shifting My rational aromaphobia Who's the most full of carp? The Unthinkable Victory When children act like adults.... Something Is Happening Here Certain opinions are worse than torturing dogs to death Capitalism And Free Press Some things are more entertaining than politics
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Markets need reliable information, but the CCP views reliable information as a threat, or at least various functionaries view reliable information as a threat.
This actually demonstrates how bureaucratic authoritarianism has more problems with maintaining legitimacy and efficacy than a traditional tyranny. The leaders can't crack down on the functionaries as that threatens the legitimacy of the party-bureaucracy from which the leaders emerged. A charismatic figure can have inspectors to curb the predations of bureaucrats as he has a direct relationship with the people and the bureaucracy relies on him for legitimacy.
The Politburo needs independent media and crusading lawyers to keep the venal provincial underlings in check so that the populace doesn't revolt, but they have to muzzle and persecute media and lawyers so that the venal provincial underlings don't revolt. They are doomed, but it's going to be messy for the rest of us.