|
|
|
|
October 14, 2009
Some things are more entertaining than politics
Former police officer Barry Cooper (author, "Never Get Busted Again") is so disgusted with the War on Drugs that he came up with an idea for a reality TV show called "Kop Busters." In a clever sting operation, police ended up raiding a house where nothing illegal was going on -- most likely because their illegal FLIR cameras detected indoor grow lights: "KopBusters rented a house in Odessa, Texas and began growing two small Christmas trees under a grow light similar to those used for growing marijuana," claims a release from NeverGetBusted.com "When faced with a suspected marijuana grow, the police usually use illegal FLIR cameras and/or lie on the search warrant affidavit claiming they have probable cause to raid the house. Instead of conducting a proper investigation which usually leads to no probable cause, the Kops lie on the affidavit claiming a confidential informant saw the plants and/or the police could smell marijuana coming from the suspected house."Here's the video: Cooper says that he targeted the Odessa police because marijuana was planted on a young woman which resulted in an eight year sentence: Cooper chose the Odessa police department for baiting because he believes police there instructed an informant to plant marijuana on a woman named Yolanda Madden. She's currently serving an eight-year sentence for possession with intent to distribute. According to Cooper, the informant actually admitted in federal court that he planted the marijuana. Madden was convicted anyway. Video here: I wish Cooper had made more of these videos, but he seems to be busy running for Attorney General on the Libertarian ticket. More power to him, and may he fight the good fight, etc. I hate to sound cynical, but history shows that Libertarian Party candidates don't win. However, it's nice to know that people who don't like police tactics in the drug war at least have an outlet, because they're not going to find it in either of the two major parties. For reasons that are not entirely clear to me, the drug war seems to have been ruled off limits for discussion by mutual agreement of both parties. What I think would be truly inspiring would be for Cooper's Republican opponent Ted Cruz (praised by NRO's Jay Nordlinger as well as Eugene Volokh) to join Cooper in denouncing the war on drugs. I say this not in any way as criticism of Cruz, who is obviously a fine man, and for whom I would have no trouble voting if I lived in Texas. The war on drugs is so institutionalized and ingrained in both parties that it's just part of the way the system works. As un-budgeable as big government itself. Voting does not change these things. Any real change in policy cannot come from the top, but has to come from below, in the form of people getting outraged. I think Cooper could accomplish more by going back to making these sting videos than he ever could by running as a Libertarian. Never mind the fact that polls show more public support for marijuana legalization -- and against cruel mandatory minimum sentencing laws -- than for gay marriage. Polls, platforms, facts and figures don't work nearly as well as seeing a video showing people something that could actually happen to them. posted by Eric on 10.14.09 at 11:03 AM
Comments
Wow. That is some incredible stuff. Little Brother is watching! Thanks for sharing. Dave Price · October 14, 2009 01:12 PM Staying out of their way is a full-time job anymore. dr kill · October 14, 2009 01:28 PM Bad Boys Bad Boys cc · October 14, 2009 08:40 PM Maybe. Maybe not. This story make a national splash back when it happened, then died down after it was reported that the cops didn't go in until the guys who set up the sting called in a phony "drug house" tip on themselves. Maybe · October 14, 2009 08:52 PM It matters not that they called the cops themselves, if they did. A house should not be raided by a SWAT team based on a single anonymous phone tip. RT · October 15, 2009 09:22 AM Politicians self-censor on the drug war because their opponents (on either side)will jump on any chance to call them soft on crime. Mr. and Mrs. low info voter will see and hears ads about how the other guy wants to turn convicted drug dealers loose in the neighborhood to prey on the children. john b · October 15, 2009 10:08 AM Seeing politicians hard on crime is an opportunity I'd rather pass on. M. Simon · October 15, 2009 10:17 AM Regarding what information the police may have been given: Have we seen the search warrant and/or the material the police used by the police to obtain the search warrant? Is that usually available to a defendant? Would that be available under discovery if Kopbusters sued the police? This information -- or in its absence, knowledge of the circumstances surrounding why it is being withheld -- would tell us a lot. DWPittelli · October 15, 2009 01:18 PM For reasons that are not clear to you?! The War on [Some] Drugs gives more power and money to cops and politicians than they would normally have. P.S. This story fell apart when it was determined that the cops didn't raid the house because they used FLIR cameras, they raided the house because Cooper phoned in a "tip". mariner · October 15, 2009 04:22 PM I think you are missing the point. It doesn't matter if the "tip" was phony. The point is that a "tip" is not a reason to search a house anyway. Jay · October 15, 2009 04:40 PM In the near future, it will be illegal to secretly videotape government employees and sycophants like Acorn committing crimes and breaking the law. Laws are for the ruled, not the rulers. John · October 15, 2009 06:56 PM I think this should be a regular and legit show - even if internet based - and expanded to include other-than-drug-related cop stings. I'm sure it could run 24/7/365 with get a huge audience and thus generate huge ad revenues that will keep it going. Mnay, many cops are terrific and law-abiding; straight-up and honorable. Unfortunately, far too many others (and one is far too many) are corrupt and sadistic. "America's Most Wanted Cops" Riis Oland · October 17, 2009 07:04 PM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
October 2009
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
October 2009
September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Another disappointing choice for the already disappointed?
Is Roland A Warrior? Why should the reproductive "right" hate the reproductive "left"? Haven't I Seen This Movie Some Where Before? Pills and Price-Shifting My rational aromaphobia Who's the most full of carp? The Unthinkable Victory When children act like adults.... Something Is Happening Here
Links
Site Credits
|
|
IUnteresting that Kop Busters blames consevatives--but I found out about them here, and all of their comments are closed.
Makes me wonder if we might have another "Me and Mr. Smith" thing here (what's that guy's name again--he has been in the news a lot lately?).