|
August 01, 2009
Try to be careful, and never pass judgment!
One of my worst nightmares involves the idea of driving on the freeway in a reasonable and prmudent manner, only to have a pedestrian suddenly appear in front of me. I've hit a couple of deer before, and that is an unpleasant experience, but deer are animals, and what can you do? If they dash out, you can try to stop, but often they are in small herds, and it is very difficult to avoid hitting all of them. Fortunately, it is illegal for pedestrians to be on freeways, and there exists a legal presumption (which we have a right to make) that other people will obey the law. But "people" includes children, and even babies. I remember one time in Berkeley when I started my car (which was parked on a public street), I thought I noticed a small moving shape in the side view mirror, just behind my car. I got out and looked and sure enough, a baby in plastic pants had crawled onto the street just behind my rear wheels. There were no adults anywhere in sight. Fortunately, I didn't back up, or the baby would have been squashed. Some young girls were playing on the sidewalk (in front of a multi-unit building), and I asked them (angrily) if they knew where the mother was. They shook their heads and said no, and I just drove away. It sounds callused, and today I would make more of a scene, but I was younger, in a hurry, had at least alerted people, and considered myself lucky to have avoided an accident. Was it my duty to have a confrontation by searching for an irresponsible mother who for all I knew might have been high on crack in one of the apartments with angry men who might have assaulted me? Personally, I think moms who allow unsupervised babies to crawl into the street should have their babies taken away, but that is not the way the system works. Bad as that was, at least it was a residential street, where pedestrians -- including infants in plastic pants -- can be expected. I had fits of paranoia later, and I have never forgotten the experience. On another occasion, a tiny boy dashed in front of my car when I was driving on Haight Street in San Francisco, and I had to slam on the brakes, missing him by inches. My passenger hit the frame of the windshield hard enough that it raised a bump on his head, and we both yelled at the kid, who was no more than six and who just stared and looked afraid before running off. Do you think there was a parent anywhere in sight? No. Once again, I did nothing but drive away and consider myself lucky. How involved should you get in these situations? Does driving carries with it a duty to stop everything you're doing and get into making police reports about kids who run off and bad parents who are nowhere around? (Police, BTW, do not enjoy wasting their time even on real auto accidents, and they are not interested in accidents that didn't happen with people who are not there.) Anyway, I have had two close calls. You can't be too careful. The fear of hitting pedestrians on residential streets is rational. And while I'd like to think that my fear of hitting pedestrians on freeways is irrational, what's to stop the type of people who let kids dash onto residential streets from letting them dash onto freeways? Nothing. All I have is my legal right to assume people will be reasonable and obey the law. But having this "right" to drive on the highway and not have pedestrians suddenly appear in front of me does not make my fear go away, because the real world is not populated by reasonable prudent people. The real world includes so many unreasonable, imprudent people that I'm not sure that there's a right to assume anything anymore. Seriously, if recent news is any indication, I now have to worry about flying babies on the freeway. Ejected from vehicles crashed by mothers not even licensed to drive: The woman who was at the wheel of a minivan involved in a tragic double fatal accident Wednesday morning on the Ohio Turnpike does not have a valid license. In fact, Fox 8 News has discovered that it appears Setita Patrick has never had a license.Authorities are searching for it. I'll just bet they are, and the personal injury lawyers will be too, because unlicensed drivers have no insurance, this is a multimillion dollar case, and trucking companies are what the trial lawyers call "deep pockets." The deaths of these innocent children is of course a horrible tragedy. But imagine being the driver of that truck. No matter how carefully he was driving, no matter how perfect a record he has, he could face hit and run charges, and for the rest of his life he will have to live with the knowledge that he squashed small children to death who were suddenly transformed into flying objects through no fault of their own. I can't believe the way they're talking about seat belts as the issue. Considering that this was a totally illegal driver, it makes about as much sense as criticizing a felon whose illegal gun went off during a robbery for ignoring firearm safety rules. I'm fascinated by how someone who has never had a drivers license managed to have it suspended 12 times. I guess they call that getting tough. Anyway, as a police spokesman explains, they're trying to avoid passing judgment: According to the Michigan Secretary of State, Setita Patrick has had her driving privileges suspended 12 times since January 2001 for traffic violations, as well as her failure to obtain a driver's license, insurance and registration.What can others learn from this situation? Since "no one wants to pass judgment" on a woman who has been driving for eight years without a license or insurance while racking up twelve suspensions, I'd say the lesson is that if you want to be an illegal driver, just go ahead. Laws are only meant to be followed by law-abiding people. Let responsible drivers get their licenses and pay for insurance, and if you get into an accident, sue them! If the lawyers can find a deep pocket, this case is worth millions of dollars -- with 30-40% going to ther lawyers, of course. It is an unconscionable system, and I speak as a lawyer who used to practice personal injury law. I get a little tired of hearing about rich doctors and big pharmaceutical companies when the trial lawyers are some of the richest people in the country -- much of their wealth being little more than ill-gotten gain. Hey, as an aside, if we're going to socialize medicine, why not socialize the trial lawyer industry? Limit their fees, and make them all work for the government! You want a trial lawyer, get in line, fill out a form, and wait. No more exorbitant fees, no more annoying billboard and bus ads, and since all the money comes into and goes out the same government pool, naturally, awards will have to be limited to what the government can afford to pay. More fair that way. Sorry, I got off track there. Socializing the trial lawyers is a whole different subject, and I shouldn't have injected it into a blog post about flying babies and unlicensed drivers and responsibility and stuff. You'd think that as a lawyer myself, I would have learned to never pass judgment. I promise to try to be more careful. posted by Eric on 08.01.09 at 10:46 AM
Comments
I saw both of these on the same day, driving north of Boston on I93: 1) Car with two fat slags in the front seat, rear window halfway down, approx. 2y.o. boy busily trying to climb out of the window. Driver and passenger oblivious. 2) Motorcycle with young boy riding pillion. His untied sneaker lace was bouncing off the spokes of the rear wheel. Sort of an amatuer recreation of the death of Isadora Duncan, or something... Man Mountain Molehill · August 1, 2009 01:14 PM Bite your tongue, Eric, about socializing the trail lawyer industry. Philadelphia's economy and incarceration rates are bad enough. Do you want those Whiplash Willies and professional plaintiffs turning into real criminals? G. Weightman · August 2, 2009 10:55 AM Hello. Thank you for this great info! Keep up the good job! johnny · August 7, 2009 05:56 AM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
August 2009
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
August 2009
July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Out Go The Lights
Meet Don Manzullo Sex With Sarah Palin And Several Animals Experience counts! Facing a "public challenge" to "come forth and publicly tell why" Schwarzenegger for President! German Scientist Doubt Climate "Consensus" Well, now I Definitely Trust these guys to lower health care costs There oughta be a law against internalized bigotry! As usual, I can't control the climate....
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Hundreds of years from now, when they write the history of the decline of the American republic, our civil legal system will be a big reason for the fall.
As far as the criminal aspect goes, anyone who commits the same misdemeanor 12 times in a row is abusing the concept of misdemeanor - a "petty crime" - and at some point during the latter part of that sequence of twelve events should have started doing some serious jail time.