|
|
|
October 05, 2008
The definition of "racism" changes to fit the Times
Sarah Palin commented on the New York Times story I discussed yesterday, and here's what she said: "Turns out one of Barack's earliest supporters is a man who, according to The New York Times, and they are hardly ever wrong, was a domestic terrorist and part of a group that, quote, launched a campaign of bombings that would target the Pentagon and U.S. Capitol. Wow. These are the same guys who think patriotism is paying higher taxes."Yes, but Palin's discussion of the Obama Ayers connection is considered a form of racism. Forgive me for not understanding, but am I allowed to ask why it's racist for Palin to comment on a story she read in the New York Times about Obama's connections with an unrepentant white terrorist? I mean how if she's guilty, what does that suggest about the Times? posted by Eric on 10.05.08 at 05:30 PM
Comments
All criticism of Obama is now defined as racism. Seriously. Isn't going to be wonderful to live in an America where criticizing the President will be prosecuted as a Hate Crime? Rhodium Heart · October 6, 2008 12:07 AM People have forgotten what racism is. All they remember is that accusations of it are "powerful". Donna B. · October 6, 2008 03:12 AM It's RASCIST to ask that question! Tawana B. · October 6, 2008 12:24 PM Don't care. Don't give a damn. I want people judged on the content of their character and O's sucks. I'd say the same if he were purple with pokadots, if he were a woman, if he were gay -- or turned on by martians - if he were disabled (other than morally.) Evil is evil no matter how protected and plated. And yes, I used the word EVIL. Look at the man's actions. He's used charities and things that were supposed to help others to advance himself. And he's not repentant. It's always someone else's fault. EVIL. Portia · October 6, 2008 01:00 PM |
|
November 2008
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
November 2008
October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
• "Will this put a stop to the idiotic rumors? Of course not!"
• Soothe The Monkeys • McCain Is Against Coal • All speech is like pornography! And libertarians don't exist! • The election is over, but the geographical literacy campaign continues • The Obama Economy - An Anecdote • cynically naive? • Criticism is not hatred • Marxing Off A Cliff • A time for hope?
Links
Site Credits
|
|
She clearly objects to Ayers for being white. That's the point, right???
P.