|
October 07, 2008
Take a real bite out of crime -- the Piranha way!
I probably complain too much about runaway federal regulations, but this time, I'm going to do more than complain. I'm going to offer praise for a solution. We are now so regulated that nearly every one of us has become a federal criminal of one sort or another. While most Americans won't wind up in the the federal penitentiary, it is not for lack of laws (which are cranked out by Congress on a daily basis like shit through a goose), but only because most of us manage to keep a low enough profile to avoid scrutiny by some eager-beaver federal prosecutor, a vengeful bureaucrat, or an activist group with an axe to grind. Anyone who doubts the metastasizing nature of the federal regulation should read these statistics (in a discussion of how what used to be ordinary negligence has in many instances become a federal crime): ...Congress has exercised precious little self-restraint in expanding the reach of federal criminal laws to new regulatory areas.That was in 2003, and since then I can only imagine how many laws have been added. Naturally, the more offenses there are, the more criminals there will be. For some reason, it never occurs to legislators that by passing more laws making more and more things illegal, they are by definition increasing crime. Anyway, that's the problem, and but for something I saw earlier on PJTV, this post would have just been another one of my pointless rants. But in today's Bill Whittle Report at PJTV, I was stunned to see a discussion of an idea that's similar to one I've had for years: why not run for office on a platform not to create more legislation, but to do precisely the opposite? Whittle proposes a new party called the Piranha Party, with the following simple platform: 1. NO NEW LEGISLATION: Instead, they'll work to undo the kind of crap listed above.2. ONE TERM ONLY: No reelection, no endless campaigning, no fundraising. After serving for a single term, candidates will return to the real world from whence they came.3. FAKE PERSONAL BACKGROUND: Each Piranha candidate will provide a presskit showing the candidate's history of voluntary cannibalism and slow poisoning of orphans, thus freeing up candidates from the hassle of worrying about the usual gotcha games over whether they've ever consumed unapproved substances, improperly filled out a government form, thrown away batteries, etc. I kid you not! It's hard not to be cheered up by this. It's wonderful idea whose time has come.
posted by Eric on 10.07.08 at 03:34 PM
Comments
Awesome idea, very sensible....which means it'll be dead in the water. Politicians maybe craven and stupid, but they will resist all attempt at making them obsolete. They do have some strong survivalist instinct. Sean the Maggot · October 12, 2008 02:12 AM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
October 2008
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
October 2008
September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Economy bad! Change good!
Who Is Barack Obama? Ohio Voter Registers Multiple Times - For My Country Would anyone cheer the defeat of capitalism? Failure of empathy Radically different values Dark Ambition the proper functioning of a republic If you don't like the cameras, stay at home! the road to serfdom is paved with "rights"
Links
Site Credits
|
|
I haven't watched the video yet, but this sounds almost like a serious proposal, even one I could get behind and maybe throw my hat in the ring as a member of so I'll make two humorless objections.
First, no new legislation is too strict. Sometimes there needs to be new legislation. I'd rather sponsor two amendments to the constitution, one requiring that bills be of a single subject and one requiring a sunset clause in each new law (and a phasing in of old laws) so that they would have to be periodically renewed (one at a time, no omnibus BS, see previous amendment) or they expire.
Second, in the House, a single term is too short to do anything. Better to limit it to three terms, matching the six-year senate term, and stagger the elections so that, like the Senate, no more than 1/3 turnover at any one time.
Do that and I'm in!