|
|
|
August 16, 2008
"having a bit of fun, the swines"
In an earlier post about the Georgia situation, I agreed with Victor Davis Hanson's characterization of the moral bankruptcy of the Western Left. From Chomsky on down, the ability of the Left to both scold the United States while obsequiously apologizing for villainous regimes (as long as they're anti-American) never ceases to amaze me. But the above is a generalization. In fairness, I have to admit that not all apologists for anti-American villainy are on the left. This morning, Pat Buchanan (who sounds for the world like a newly minted Russian lobbyist) reminded me that I shouldn't be too quick to assume that "only the Left" would cozy up to the Bear at a time like this: American charges of Russian aggression ring hollow. Georgia started this fight -- Russia finished it. People who start wars don't get to decide how and when they end.Nice. That gratuitous swipe at Israel is vintage Buchanan, who's getting warmed up for another one of his time-honored hallmarks -- a reference to Weimar Germany: That Putin took the occasion of Saakashvili's provocative and stupid stunt to administer an extra dose of punishment is undeniable. But is not Russian anger understandable? For years the West has rubbed Russia's nose in her Cold War defeat and treated her like Weimar Germany.Read it all. Especially if you're in the mood to have your stereotypical thinking about the left annoyingly shattered as mine was. The problem with Buchanan is that he's such a good writer that I enjoy being annoyed -- even tortured -- by him. Almost as much as I enjoy being annoyed and tortured by James Wolcott (who these days is "light[ing] a little candle each evening that McCain will choose Joe Lieberman as his all-bran vice presidential sidekick--the Sunshine Boys of Cold War II.") Such a paradox is nothing new. In Dr. Strangelove, Group Captain Lionel Mandrake admitted that his swinish torturers made good cameras: ...when they tortured you did you talk? posted by Eric on 08.16.08 at 09:30 AM
Comments
Eric, I get his newsletter just to keep track of him. I was going to do a post on this edition. Glad you beat me to it. Steve, My bet is that the Russians killed a bunch of "passport" Russians and blamed it on the Georgians. M. Simon · August 16, 2008 11:46 AM @Steve: you mean Buchanan didn't already claim exactly that ? Oh wait, never mind, it was the other Goebbels who did. Peter · August 16, 2008 12:14 PM Steve Skubinna said it right. Buchanan is a loathsome toad. I will not even read his crap. Never, ever claim that idiot is a conservative. Robohobo · August 16, 2008 3:17 PM Thank you for pointing out this article; I suspected that Pat and the traditionalists might have a different perspective on this issue, than the prevailing "conservative" and "Republican" perspective. I remember when a Democrat was in the White House, and the overwhelming majority of Republicans and conservatives were anti-imperialism, while echoing Mr. Buchanan and "leading the anti-war movement." The virtues of national sovereignty and non-interventionism were espoused, by most Republicans and conservatives, including the national leaders and organizations of our movement. Russia was an issue at that time as well, and most conservatives and Republicans recognized the folly of riling the "bear," and possibly re-igniting the Cold War, which President Ronald Reagan so shrewdly ended.
http://www.conservapedia.com/Neoconservatism Myself and others have been fighting this battle for some time now. We will continue to do so. Aakash · August 16, 2008 4:24 PM Wow. Buchanan has lost it. Based on his closing paragraphs alone, he's lost it. I grew up during the Reagan administration, and I seem to remember the general strategy as publically stated by the Soviet government as one of creating a sphere of influence in Latin America based on military power. No, the influence was not just a navy base in Cuba and some advisors for FARC in Colombia, but let's see, there were the Sandinistas who were getting Soviet support, Salvadoran rebels who were getting Soviet support, to name two right off the top of my head. We were opposing the very things that Buchanan mentions, and I'm quite happy that we spoiled Soviet fun there. Had Reagan not been there, we'd probably be keeping quiet and pretending that "revolutionary socialism" was exactly what the people of Latin America wanted and needed. The "democratic imperialism" sobriquet is laughable. Only someone who thinks that isolating one's nation from the rest of the world is the best foreign policy ever would come up with such a oxymoron. JC · August 18, 2008 12:28 PM Post a comment |
|
April 2011
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
April 2011
March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 Sarah Hoyt Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
• A knee sock jihad might be premature at this time
• People Are Not Rational • No Biorobots For Japan • The Thorium Solution • Radiation Detector From A Digital Camera • Voter Fraud? • This war of attrition is driving me bananas! • Attacking Christianity is one thing, but must they butcher geometry? • Are there trashy distinctions in freedom of expression? • Please Don't Let Me Be Misunderstood
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Buchanan is such a loathsome toad that I can't even bring myself to read his stuff any more.
He isn't really a conservative, or on the right except to the extent that Lyndon LaRouche is. He occupies a fringe of his own making. By now I expect him to claim that Poland started WWII by having their troops cross the border and assault a German radio station.