|
July 08, 2008
Perpetuating -- and expanding -- the damage?
(How about a simple solution?) Tom Anderson (who writes for the Inquirer's quirky little conservative competitor, The Bulletin) covered a talk by Charles Murray about his latest book, Real Education: Four Simple Truths for Bringing America's Schools Back to Reality. The four truths are these: The first of his four truths, likely to be unappealing across the political spectrum, is just two words: Abilities vary. Put another way, the great pipe-dream of contemporary academia, and of course politics as well, is that no child can be left behind. Mr. Murray proposes that many children - probably most - will always be left behind, not because of an uncaring citizenship or educational environment, but simply because they were not born with intelligence, cognitive abilities and IQs of a level sufficient to make them competitive in modern intelligence-driven societies.I agree that the nonsense courses in things like ethnic studies should be scrapped, but I'd note that "mick" courses are nothing new. The greater danger, IMO, comes from the radical assault on the old core from within. History and English are being undermined by post-modernist "theory," and even basic sciences are under assault. While these post-modernist assaults ensure that students learn less and less about the subjects, they are not really perceived as dumbing-down in the conventional sense. That's because they're packaged as highly sophisticated, intellectually-challenging, and are carefully designed to flatter mediocre but compliant students into believing they are now true intellectuals who have mastered what is erroneously called "critical thinking." (As Elizabeth Scalia demonstrated, it's quite the opposite.) So, while the net effect is a dumbing down, I think the process is so covert that it really ought to be called "dumbing down in drag." When this systematic attack on the university education is coupled with a climate where "everyone has to go to college" I find myself wondering whether in addition to massive dumbing-down, there's also a "dumbing-up." If primary and secondary schools are underperforming (which they are), then simple economics would dictate that colleges cater to what is, after all, their market. Unfortunately, the result is that uneducated kids can end up attending colleges which "teach" them that what they should have learned is worthless anyway, and that they're now incredibly cool -- intellectuals, even -- to reject it. This makes about as much sense as taking a talentless kid who can't paint, putting him in art school, then telling him his stick figures are just as valuable as the Dutch Masters. Sure, the art college could issue him a diploma, but would anyone buy his paintings? I don't know how well the art analogy holds educationally, but in economic terms, colleges don't seem to be doing much better. According to Arnold Kling, colleges are now graduating students who barely earn $25,000 a year: My wife's pet peeve is colleges that charge $50,000 a year and wind up graduating students who take jobs for $25,000 a year, if that much. My pet peeve is the nonprofit virus that college spreads.(Via Glenn Reynolds.) Plumbers and electricians make far more than that; I've known auto mechanics who make $100,000 a year. More disturbing is Kling's argument that non-profits represent a growing business trend: I thought that their goal of working for non-profits reflected misplaced idealism. Instead, it apparently represents catching the wave of business trends."Business for people and not for profit?" Ugh. I'd hate to think this represents a trend towards increased state control (via a merger of the public and private sectors through "non-profit" subsidization) over the business sector. I like Kling's conclusion about working for money: Generally speaking, it's morally safer to work for money than to work for a cause. People who are fanatical about causes do much more damage.Well, if they're a product of a very damaged educational system (a system that puts Oprah ahead of Milton), why should it surprise anyone if they're trained to work for causes that do more damage? They're the damage that damage produced. But rather than merely complain in a blog post, I thought I'd offer a solution. In lieu of devoting four years and over $100,000 to learn how to sound critical of what was never learned, I have a simple money-saving idea. The entire Great Books of the Western World series "retails for US$1,195" (Amazon offers the entire set for only $995.00 including shipping) and can be found used for much less. (It's the entire Western canon, which does not change, so used is just as useful as new.) If a student devoted a full four years to a serious reading and studying of the Great Books, I'd be willing to bet he'd end up being better educated than your typical liberal arts graduate. I realize that the self-discipline involved might be difficult for the average student. So why not form private "home colleges" with tests and even grades? Enterprising students could even organize online. Hey kids! Save money while saving Western Civilization! posted by Eric on 07.08.08 at 11:25 AM
Comments
There is value to self-instruction. My grandfather's family was so poor (Depression Era) that he never attended college. Instead, he read avidly and he is one of the most informed critical thinkers I have ever met. By contrast, I attended Harvard. And while I chuckle at the Good Will Hunting quote, I have to disagree with its veracity. Good teaching and instruction is necessary for many people to be successful. Certainly our colleges and universities are not perfect and there is a wide variance in quality across the board. But the institution itself is not the problem - its the execution and the inconsistency. Erica · July 8, 2008 01:06 PM Fascinating topic. Thirdly, while I agree with Murray about the nature of the problem - too many people working on educational material that is not especially useful to them and that they are not suited for - his solutions seem to be at best an initial direction to try. Fourth, a caution: remember that it was the intelligent class of 19th-20th C Europe - elite males who were trained in the Western canon - who brought us marxism and fascism as well as the general theory of relativity. Darwin, clearly a scientific thinker of a high order and a precise observer, nonetheless had social opinions that were without scientific foundation. Restricting college to the elites just brings in a different set of problems. Assistant Village Idiot · July 8, 2008 02:43 PM The grandparents of today's youth were much more successful than the current generation in acquiring reading, math, and reasoning skills. So discussion of the variation in native gifts does not explain our current situation. It's about attitude - not just postmodern deconstruction, but the cult of self-esteem and anti-intellectualism, and the sloth and insulation from reality that come with prosperity. Ben-David · July 8, 2008 03:42 PM College... well, I should have a degree in something by now. I've got more than 20 hours over the requirement, but I've not got enough in any one "discipline" to count as a major. Why can't one graduate with six minors? Donna B. · July 9, 2008 12:19 AM College... well, I should have a degree in something by now. I've got more than 20 hours over the requirement, but I've not got enough in any one "discipline" to count as a major. Why can't one graduate with six minors? Gringo · July 9, 2008 10:30 AM Sanity is optional. Beck · July 19, 2008 08:53 PM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
July 2008
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
July 2008
June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Con Law
Nature gives hot rod hives LSD Art to die for? Even halos have to be earned! Yes, but what is disruptive? Spreading oil over government ripples It's Cheaper To Buy Than Steal McCain can't even log on to nick.com! Huge news -- and strange silence....
Links
Site Credits
|
|
or, to quote Good Will Hunting:
"...150 grand on a ______ education you could have got for a dollar fifty in late charges at the public library!"
A very enlightening post.
Thanks,
D