Gratuitous grammatical and stylistic advice for talking heads

Adjust your tinfoil hats, and heed the words of an electronic-emission-plagued Frenchman quoted here:

With the good sleep results obtained out of my home, I decided to built a FARADAY cage around my bed. During day time I wore a special shielded cap. That special shielded cap has an incredible history; one day when I felt dizzy with very strong headache I cover my head with aluminium paper and placed a cap on top; the results were quite incredible. Then I ordered a special cap on INTERNET, since then I keep that cap on my head as long as I can. I even dare to wear my special cap on my job site.

With my FARADAY cage and my special shielded cap slowly I was able to overcome my electro-sensitiveness to electromagnetic waves.

It makes now more than two years that I am obliged to flee my workplace. I am most of the times working from home. It makes more than three years I sleep in a Faraday cage. I avoid all chemicals products from food and cosmetics. I take no more antioxidant or any other potion.

(Via Justin, who told me about this because he knows how fond I am of that emerging nexus between neurotic diseases and politics.)

French drives me crazy, because I never learned it, cannot speak it, don't like the sound of it, and what limited knowledge I have is a result of having soaked up bits and pieces as a result of traveling and patronizing the arts. My Spanish is good, but if I want that Ph.D. in Art History that I've been urged to get, I'd have to learn French. My lesson for today arises from worrying whether I was correct in titling the picture that follows "La Cage du Faraday" -- or whether it should be "La Cage de Faraday." (My guess is that because it pertains to Faraday yet didn't belong to him, "du" would be correct.)

Anyway, here's the cage in question which allows the electronically threatened Frenchman to sleep in safety:

La_Cage_du_Faraday.jpg

Concludes Depleted Cranium,

The picture above is of the Faraday cage this individual built. Too bad there were no pictures of the aluminum foil hat!
Yes, it really is. Because the French have a flair for style, and, well, much as I hate to say this, your typical American tin foil hat-wearer looks like a clod.

Seriously, if you're going to wear one of those things, don't you want to look your best?

Not that a tin foil hat would shield you from the guillotine, but even there, the French had style. Louis XVI faced his death with such dignity and class that it (along with the courage of his wife) may have contributed to the eventual backlash which developed.

I'm not about to attempt a translation of this engraving, which shows the French fascination with the severed head of Louis XVI -- but I just had to torture the language roots a little by titling it "Caput de Capet." (The man went to the guillotine as "Louis Capet" and the name was derived from the Latin word for head.)

Caput_de_Capet.jpg

Ouch.

But if you lose your head, don't try to be a talking head. Contrary to urban legend, there's no evidence that it ever happened. However, there's this intriguing eyewitness account from a physician who witnessed a 1905 guillotining, and was allowed the privilege of interacting with a freshly and cleanly severed head.

"I waited for several seconds. The spasmodic movements ceased. The face relaxed, the lids half closed on the eyeballs, leaving only the white of the conjunctiva visible, exactly as in the dying whom we have occasion to see every day in the exercise of our profession, or as in those just dead. It was then that I called in a strong, sharp voice: "Languille!" I saw the eyelids slowly lift up, without any spasmodic contractions - I insist advisedly on this peculiarity - but with an even movement, quite distinct and normal, such as happens in everyday life, with people awakened or torn from their thoughts.
Next Languille's eyes very definitely fixed themselves on mine and the pupils focused themselves. I was not, then, dealing with the sort of vague dull look without any expression, that can be observed any day in dying people to whom one speaks: I was dealing with undeniably living eyes which were looking at me. "After several seconds, the eyelids closed again, slowly and evenly, and the head took on the same appearance as it had had before I called out.

"It was at that point that I called out again and, once more, without any spasm, slowly, the eyelids lifted and undeniably living eyes fixed themselves on mine with perhaps even more penetration than the first time. The there was a further closing of the eyelids, but now less complete. I attempted the effect of a third call; there was no further movement - and the eyes took on the glazed look which they have in the dead.

"I have just recounted to you with rigorous exactness what I was able to observe. The whole thing had lasted twenty-five to thirty seconds.

That's a bit on the creepy side, and it's a good argument for lethal injection -- or maybe for the use of a duller blade, which would be more likely to cause immediate unconsciousness from blunt trauma. [Not to worry about a failure of decapitation, though; the blades weigh 88 lbs, and drop from a 14 foot height.] Ironically, the sharper the blade, the cleaner the cut, and the more likely the suffering -- although I do think that the huge sudden drop in blood pressure would in most cases cause an immediate loss of all consciousness, so while I'm skeptical of the physician's claims, what he describes might be theoretically possible in rare cases.

While I'd rather be a dead head than a talking head (groan!), fortunately, this is all theory.

In today's civilized world, we should be more worried about protection against electronic emissions.

Phew. (I didn't feel safe publishing this until 9:12.... And don't blame me for this post. Justin made me do it!)

posted by Eric on 06.06.08 at 09:12 AM





TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://classicalvalues.com/cgi-bin/pings.cgi/6778






Comments

This was a majorly gicky post, but thanks...I did read the whole thing.

I didn't read all of "Hannibal", the third installment of the Thomas Harris novels. I have not to this day been able to watch the movie, with the dread of watching what words made entirely too uncomfortable. Even though it was an interesting "concept". (And what a metaphor, being fed ones' own mind.)

The nice thing about books is that you can simply skip a few pages ahead.

OregonGuy   ·  June 6, 2008 02:51 PM

Hi Eric-

I agree with your "blood pressure" argument. Indeed, I've often wondered if that well-known report by "Dr. Beaurieux" is apocryphal. If you google a bit, you see that the supposed source is the journal "Archives d’Anthropologie Criminelle," in an article published in 1905. But that journal is now on line, and is searchable. I can't find anything related there.

http://www.criminocorpus.cnrs.fr/ebibliotheque/ice/

I suspect someone made the whole thing up.

-Steve

SteveBrooklineMA   ·  June 7, 2008 02:21 PM

It took a while to wade through the pages, but the article is there in Archieve D'Anthroplogie Criminelle after all. It's in the 1905 volume, pp 643-648. In French, of course.

SteveBrooklineMA   ·  June 7, 2008 03:17 PM


November 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30            

ANCIENT (AND MODERN)
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR


Search the Site


E-mail




Classics To Go

Classical Values PDA Link



Archives




Recent Entries



Links



Site Credits