|
May 25, 2008
Well, neurosis is a disease, isn't it?
I love thinking about the psychiatric underpinnings of the "Wi-Fi allergy" meme that's been floating around like an Internet virus: A group in Santa Fe says the city is discriminating against them because they say that they're allergic to the wireless Internet signal. And now they want Wi-Fi banned from public buildings.I think these people are victims of psychosomatic group hysteria -- something I have discussed before in general. This post by Dr. Helen touched on similar disease symptoms in the context of Wi-Fi. (At the time, the medical community did not accept the existence of the condition.) What's interesting is that such mental states are known to be able to bring on actual physical symptoms. I do not doubt for a moment that Mr. Firstenberg (an activist with a Wiki entry, BTW) does in fact get chest pains, and that they are real. But a lot of pain and a lot of disease symptoms have strong mind body connections. Books like this have been written on the subject. That the mind can cause or aggravate physical symptoms of disease does not diminish their reality to the patient, nor does it in any way diminish their suffering. That emotional distress can make you sick is not a terribly profound nor terribly new idea. Why, even this blog post might upset people -- especially those who believe the Wi-Fi signals are the direct cause of their symptoms, rather than a trigger of a mental process which causes them. It is not unreasonable to assume that in such cases, mere disagreement with the diagnosis of such a suggestible person might cause more symptoms to erupt. Even political disagreements can cause physical symptoms of illness. At the height of the Bush Derangement Hysteria era, I heard about a woman who fulminations against Bush caused her to literally erupt in hives -- something that shocked my friend whose disagreement with her had set it off. This all raises an interesting point, though, because if we assume for the sake of argument that certain suggestible people like this will get chest pains in the presence of Wi-Fi, and that these symptoms can be documented, under the law it really doesn't matter how they originate, because it is the Wi-Fi signal (or, at least the awareness of the WiFi signal) that triggered them. Whether the signals cause the disease symptoms directly or indirectly via a psychogenic component, they still could be considered a violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act. All symptoms and diseases are created equal. And after all, isn't that what lawyers are for? If racism can cause symptoms, why not Wi-Fi? And while we're at it, why not a lot of other things? (Global Warming, for starters....) Hey, I'm not being judgmental here. I'm just as sick as anyone else. Isn't my neurosis just as valid as anyone else's? MORE: Despite my satirical tone, this is no joke to activists like Mr. Firstenberg, whose group advocates getting rid of a lot of things many people take for granted: Electric floor or ceiling heaters, fluorescent lights, dimmer switches, and electronic security systems can all produce problematic electromagnetic fields. Finding all the sources and eliminating or avoiding them requires patience and may be time-consuming but is not necessarily difficult or expensive.While I remain skeptical, anyone has the right not to use electronic equipment, and to shun all such technology. However (and perhaps this comes from living for decades in Berkeley), the worry wart inside me causes me to wonder whether this could lead to a busybody movement against "second hand electronic emissions" -- in a manner similar to the movement against smoking. Back in the early 70s, I laughed at Berkeley's GASPers. No one laughs at them now. But suppose someone said this: "Please turn off your laptop. You're emissions are hurting my health!"That's still funny, isn't it? But how long will it be funny? I'd appreciate having some sort of time frame, because after all, satire can be ruined by too much reality. posted by Eric on 05.25.08 at 10:35 AM
Comments
The country is flooded with healthophobes, and unethical academics provide them with spurious statistics to back their claims. Our courts should have long ago held that if one finds others' practice of liberty tickles their phobias, he should stay home. It is impossible to run a mutually respectable society when every hypochondriac and his placebo can successfully petition the government to bully the people whose doings he disapproves. It's just plain tyranny. Brett · May 26, 2008 09:10 AM It's worth noting that *this* is an actual example of a problem that can be cured by wearing a tin-foil hat. Amazing. Clint · May 26, 2008 01:06 PM On a CA-NY Jet Blue flight not long ago, shortly after takeoff an announcement was made that because one passenger had a severe allergy to nuts, the usual nut snacks would not be offered and we were all requested not to eat any nuts we had brought on board ourselves. What most irked me was the fait accompli aspect. But what should have happened? Should this person simply not fly, as being too much of a burden to others? Should the airline refuse to make accommodation? And after the nut allergies, what shall we say about perfumes in such enclosed, semi-public spaces? And the list will surely go on, until surely, yes, I will be asked not to operate my laptop on board next to someone who claims a problem with it. italtrav · May 27, 2008 09:28 AM Clint, I thought the exact same thing. Phelps · May 27, 2008 02:52 PM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
May 2008
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
May 2008
April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSALLAMERICANGOP See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Republicans Need A Hawaiian On The Ticket
Highway 61 Revisited save the Rhinos! Unoriginal non-endorsements cheerfully issued here! Stop the numbers already! Prevent buyers' remorse! Peace Through War Remembrances SoHo in perspective Why the lesser of two evils is more evil than the greater What Is Wrong With Republicans?
Links
Site Credits
|
|
I say we take this seriously right after they demonstrate they can reliably tell when a wifi is on or off.