|
November 29, 2007
There oughta be a law, right?
A recent Philadelphia shooting has attracted so much local attention that I thought it merited a post. The situation is so appalling, and the family so squalid and so dysfunctional, that it challenges my usual libertarian sensibilities, and while it doesn't incline me towards communitarian thinking, it does incline me to entertain the idea that some situations -- and some people -- might be so hopeless as to be beyond redemption. This is, I admit, an ugly thought, and one most people don't allow themselves to have. But is denial the better approach? Too many libertarians just want the world to be the way they are. They behave responsibly, and therefore so should others. Tell that to the family involved here: Philadelphia - A five-year old boy was shot outside a Philadelphia Housing Authority (PHA) home early yesterday morning, police said yesterday.Did the 15 year old steal the guns accidentally too? What was a 5 year old doing hanging on the street corner at 1:00 a.m.? That was a couple of days ago. In today's Inquirer, it was reported that the boy has been arrested, and the mother of the five year old is having her children taken away. The wounded boy's siblings have been placed in the custody of child welfare officials.But she's a good mother! Relatives said Stallings was a good mother who left her children with a baby-sitter while she visited friends nearby.I must be getting old and uptight, but I think age five is too young to be hanging out on street corners, and eleven is definitely too young to be stealing cars. At that age, the kid might have problems seeing over the dashboard. Someone might get hurt. In another piece, a relative weighed in on the family's, um, issues: Aisha Meggett, Stallings' cousin, said the police have the story all wrong. She was babysitting at the home yesterday and helping to clean up; clothes were strewn around the living room following the police search the night before.Oh well in that case, it's fine! Five year olds have a perfect right to be hanging out on the street at 10:30 unsupervised. And food in the refrigerator? What more evidence of responsibility do we need? "There's no gun in this house, no drugs, nothing," Meggett said. "My cousin wouldn't jeopardize anything." She had no idea how Fletcher obtained the gun. "Kids find guns and they play with them. If they [police] found a gun here, they set us up."I'm sure there are plenty of gun control advocates who'd agree with the people quoted that the problem is guns, because families that let their five year olds hang out on the street where they find guns and play with them are utterly blameless. The worst thing about this is that while I don't blame guns for being stolen and played with any more than I'd blame the car that the eleven-year-old stole, I worry. My worry is that there might be people who just plain shouldn't have guns. They shouldn't have cars. And in all probability, they shouldn't have kids. (The mother who was at the cocktail lounge when all this happened has had hers taken away.) Not that any of this matters. I doubt that the mother or any of her kids are allowed to own firearms anyway. That's why the gun control people are upset by cases like this. Notice how the Inquirer trots out the stock phrase "ready availability of guns," though. They're writing about a group of people who are not legally allowed to have them, yet who claim they are everywhere, and admit their kids are playing with them. If there is a problem with ready availability, I would suggest it is a law enforcement problem. The idea of passing more laws for such people to ignore is laughable. It is illegal for 15 year olds to steal guns. It is illegal for 15 year olds to possess guns. Similarly, it is illegal for 11 year olds to steal cars, and the last I heard, it was also illegal for them to drive them! Now, let's suppose the 11 year old who stole the car had managed to run over the 5 year old before the 15 year old had managed to shoot him. Would anyone be complaining about the "ready availability" of cars? If this family proves a ready availability of anything, it's that Philadelphia has a ready availability of crime. (Need I point out for the umpteenth time that there is also a ready availability of laws? Nah, why bother?) The problem is that I can offer no solutions, which is what makes posts like this emotionally unfulfilling to write. Libertarianism offers nothing by way of solutions to intractable social problems. People like me tend to have a "Leave me alone in my house, and I'll leave you alone in your house" approach. This might work fine among libertarians who don't believe in "It Takes A Village." But what happens when the village wants village laws, village rule, and (ultimately) village tyranny? What happens when the village "decides" it does not like the "ready availability" of freedom? Can I just go get it somewhere else? MORE: This quote from Ludwig von Mises may be helpful to libertarians in their time of need: A free man must be able to endure it when his fellow men act and live otherwise than he considers proper. He must free himself from the habit, just as soon as something does not please him, of calling for the police. posted by Eric on 11.29.07 at 05:05 PM |
|
December 2007
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
December 2007
November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSALLAMERICANGOP See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
I don't ask readers for money, BUT.....
Benazir Bhutto dead crouching tiger, hidden agenda? Faking Sock Puppets We'll make static analysis work this time! Slouching towards altruism Still in the Christmas spirit! Ha Ha Huckabee, and Ho Ho Hillary Ethernet Cable Help Political Lexicon
Links
Site Credits
|
|