|
December 20, 2007
4-year-old dies from "epidemic"
Well, that's what it says in the paper. What's the epidemic? Guns, of course. The 4-year-old found his father's gun, and shot himself with it: Yesterday afternoon, Nahdirah Jaamar dropped by a rowhouse on Salford Street to pick up her younger brother and ran into her 4-year-old cousin, Dyshon Boyd, a boisterous toddler that family members called "Pooh Bear."If you read the story carefully, you will see that the gun is clearly made out to be the culprit. It's, well, it's really as if the gun shot the boy all by itself: . Police said Dyshon shot himself once in the throat about 4:50 p.m. inside the Southwest Philadelphia rowhouse belonging to a grandmother and great-grandmother.Yeah, and apparently he gave him access to his gun too. It's all part of the "epidemic." Jaamar described her little cousin as a playful toddler who loved eating pizza from the nearby deli and watching cartoons on Nickelodeon.There's more about the boy, and there's no denying the tragedy of what happened here. But I want to stay with "the weapon that killed him." How did this "epidemic" kill the boy? Presumably, the epidemic is a result of a lack of gun control laws which might have stopped the boy from having access to the gun. You know, a "but for" causation. Had there been a gun control law in place, this boy might be alive today. Does that sound like an unreasonable hypothetical? Read on. Because, as it turns out, the Philadelphia Inquirer was responsible enough to report some additional details about the father's possession of the gun. Amazingly, the gun was seriously illegal! This "great father" was, it seems, a career criminal who had served time on gun and drug offenses, and it was a felony for him to so much as possess the gun which the 4-year-old found: The District Attorney today approved criminal charges against the father of 4-year-old Dyshon Boyd, who accidentally shot and killed himself Monday in Southwest Philadelphia.So, there were laws in place which would have protected this child. His criminal father was not allowed to have guns. So if is this father's violation of existing laws is part of a gun epidemic, then what exactly is the epidemic? The guns? Or the breaking of the laws against felons possessing guns? Philadelphia's Police Commissioner seems more concerned with sending a message about guns generally than with sending a message to criminals. In his statement, he does not mention criminal possession of firearms: Police Commissioner Sylvester M. Johnson said the father apparently tossed the gun from a window.Why is it that no one wants to send the message that guns are dangerous as well as illegal if possessed by felons? Like, "We have to send a message out to Philadelphia that felons with guns are dangerous."? The point here isn't whether they leave them in an unprotected place; they're not allowed to leave them anywhere! With all this talk of gun "epidemics," and "availability" of firearms, you'd almost think they didn't want Philadelphians to know they already have strict gun control laws in place which apply to criminals. (And which, if they had been obeyed and/or enforced, would have prevented the father from having the gun.) They might realize that if there is an "epidemic," it involves criminals who don't obey gun laws. UPDATE: My thanks to Bill Quick for the link! UPDATE: And my thanks to Emperor Misha for the link! posted by Eric on 12.20.07 at 11:03 AM
Comments
this is all to common when the socialist media and politicians make up stories about fire arms.if you listen to these characters it's always the guns falut never the felons or inforcement just the bad old GUN.i wonder are there people out there who belive this big lie? bruce · December 21, 2007 03:45 PM There was a much sadder case in Michigan a few years back. A boy of similar age finds a loaded pistol in his parents' house, takes it to school, and shoots another student fatally with it. (Little indication of malice aforethought, though the reporters/police never mentioned any worries about it.) Turns out that the "owner" of said gun had a similar criminal record. It was hard to miss when you read/heard the full report. Somehow, no one went on a crusade to deny firearms to such felons. karrde · December 21, 2007 05:21 PM If there were only a law... and one is passed. But it isn't enough - so another law is passed. And another. And another, and another, another, another.... And at some point, eventually, someone's got to realize that passing a law doesn't do one damn bit of good... unless there's enforcement OF that law! Which seemed to be conspicuiously missing in this case. But that's okay... just pass another law and things will be fine! J. JLawson · December 21, 2007 09:18 PM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
January 2008
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
January 2008
December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSALLAMERICANGOP See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Is Huckabee simply the anti-Romney?
Callipyginous Ephebiphobia on the campaign trail? Policy Of Blockade HAPPY NEW YEAR! slanted or planted? Stifling diversity in the name of diversity? Insensitivity in the name of sensitivity? Fred's Message To Iowans A Marine Needs Help Recreating a past we only imagine
Links
Site Credits
|
|
The guy has just turned 24 and has multiple convictions on drug and gun charges and he's still out on the street? We may indeed have serious laws on the books but it seems someone's not enforcing them very well.