|
December 04, 2007
Toxic Hsu toys 4 unbreakable nuts
We've all heard about teflon presidents. Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton are both frequently cited as examples. Is Hillary Clinton also made of teflon? To tell the truth, I never really thought of her as the teflon type. But how about a Hillary made of "long-lasting PVC"? Yeah, I know it's just a dog toy which Dr. Helen linked earlier (a "political pet dog chew modeled after Hillary Clinton" to be exact), but I think Coco might be more comfortable to chew on a I mean, consider the facts about PVC: Dec. 4 (Bloomberg) -- Just as consumers have crossed off their holiday shopping lists toys tainted with lead paint, another child-safety issue may become a season spoiler.Phthalates? That sounds really scary. It's almost as if Bush and Cheney are sneaking WMDs into our toys. But if Hillary is a part of this conspiracy, where do we turn? The poison plastic is a huge deal, too. Activists have even gone so far as to blow up a giant rubber duckie: Target was the latest subject of a grassroots anti-PVC lobbying campaign, led by the Center for Health, Environment and Justice.The Wall Street Journal has more, and highlights the presence of an unpronounceable problem. Phthalates: Phthalates, chemicals often added to PVC to increase flexibility, have been linked to reproductive development problems in males. The European Union and California have banned the sale of toys containing phthalates. The California ban will go into effect in 2009.Reproductive failure in males? You'd think the environmentalists would be all for that. Don't they love reproductive failure, in humans and in animals? But there's a larger issue here than plastic poison, toxic phthalates, and reproductive failure. A larger issue even, than the implications of a long-lasting PVC Hillary. That's this: How I am supposed to choose between the toxic Hillary Clinton long-lasting PVC chew toy and the less offensive Hillary Clinton nut cracker? I mean really. Check it out: I think the "stainless steel thighs" make the nutcracker sweet! Decisions, decisions. posted by Eric on 12.04.07 at 12:27 PM
Comments
Sorry if that came off a little hysterical... I just got home from work and haven't had a chance to settle down yet. John S. · December 4, 2007 06:13 PM "Phthalates, chemicals often added to PVC to increase flexibility" Back in the '80's, I used to work in a factory in Phila that made: " Di basic lead phthalates." It was was in Port Richmond. Used to be National Lead. Now just a parking lot. Address: 2545 Aramingo Ave. Do a Google Sat search. doug · December 4, 2007 09:26 PM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
January 2008
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
January 2008
December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSALLAMERICANGOP See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Is Huckabee simply the anti-Romney?
Callipyginous Ephebiphobia on the campaign trail? Policy Of Blockade HAPPY NEW YEAR! slanted or planted? Stifling diversity in the name of diversity? Insensitivity in the name of sensitivity? Fred's Message To Iowans A Marine Needs Help Recreating a past we only imagine
Links
Site Credits
|
|
What the heck is wrong with PVC? Does it emit toxic gases, or is it poisonous if ingested? I haven't heard anything about this. It figures that one of the most common plastics is now verboten. We can't have plastics because they're poisonous, we can't use metals because they involve mining (i.e. raping the earth), we can't use wood because it involves killing trees... Shall we just head meekly back to the stone age, then? No, probably not, because somebody will come up with some way that using stone hurts the environment.