|
August 11, 2007
How guns make good criminals bad
Today's Philadelphia Inquirer has a front page story about a Chinese store owner who was murdered by neighborhood kids. While this was an otherwise well-researched story, for some reason the Inquirer left Commissioner Sylvester Johnson out, despite the fact that he appears to have been directly in charge the whole time at the crime scene. I say "well researched" because the Inquirer wouldn't let the perfectly competent Joseph Gambardello write the story alone. Instead, they have added two co-authors, including the Inquirer's visiting Chinese intern Lou Yi whose reportorial expertise seems to be invoked when reports touch on Asian cultural issues. I'll return to the Inquirer, but I noticed that a Fox News story does quote Philadelphia's Police Commissioner Sylvester Johnson, who once again seems to think the issue involves guns: "It's another example of guns and the person who doesn't want to go out there and work for his money, thinks the way to get it is to rob somebody," said Philadelphia Police Commissioner Sylvester Johnson.The shooter was 15 years old, and while he hasn't yet been caught, there's a mug shot of him here, presumably taken a year ago, when he last robbed the same store. Frankly, he doesn't look at all like a child. While it may well be that he "doesn't want to go out there and work for his money," on the other hand it might be difficult to find employers who are willing to risk running afoul of the various restrictions on hiring "children" under 16. I mean, he's supposed to be in school studying hard so he can get into the college of his choice, right? I don't mean to sound skeptical, but that is the theory. Guns always get the blame in cases like this, and it's easy to see why. It just doesn't seem right to blame a "child." The victim's family seems to understand this intuitively, for the Inquirer quotes the slain grocer's family as giving up on Philadelphia, presumably because there isn't enough gun control: The Lu family, meanwhile, has given up on the city and plans to move to New York.I hate to be a constant nag, but the fact is, there are already very strict gun control laws involving minors and felons. The accused shooter was not allowed to buy or possess the gun. If his 19 year old accomplice had a felony record, then his possession of the gun would have been a felony. Likewise, their carrying it concealed without a permit is another crime. It was a crime for the shooter to have the gun. Exactly what kind of gun control is supposed to work in cases like this, where kids in their mid teens don't want to go out and work for a living and for all I know aren't buckling down in school? Actually, I can't be sure about the latter, as it's speculation on my part. It is possible that the shooter might have been an honor student with a perfect attendance record. Certainly, his family and neighbors (notwithstanding his previous armed robbery) seem to think he's a good kid, and that the crime is a tragedy for both "sides": Yesterday afternoon, Canady's mother, Camilla Brown, sat on the front porch of the family house on tree-lined Carver Street, two blocks from Lu Grocery.Nobody wants to be a robber or a killer? Then why are there robberies and killings? Because of peer pressure? Because of the guns? I guess if we apply the block captain's logic, no one wants to have a gun either. Somehow, though, the guns manage to make the children find them them and possess them illegally and then shoot people with them even though they don't want to? For inanimate objects, these guns are awfully powerful. While the shooter's character is described as good, neighbors don't seem so sure about the victim of the slaying, who now stands accused of, well, racism: Like some other residents, she expressed some discomfort with Lu Jiaxing, saying she thought he viewed black people with suspicion. Other residents, though, said Lu made a point of knowing his customers so well that he knew what each typically bought at the store.Assuming this is all true, if we weigh the good (helping the block captain find her lost ATM card) against the bad (viewing "black people with suspicion"), I still don't really see the relevance. A kid who robs a store, and then a year later puts a bullet through a store owner in a second robbery simply does not strike me as a good kid, and even if the deceased store owner was a racist grouch, that is in no way a mitigating circumstance. (Unless, of course, slutty looking women deserve to be raped.) Another neighbor is quoted as being upset by the victim's wife dismantling a makeshift "memorial" to her husband: Another neighborhood resident, Edward Molizone, 74, touched on the suspicion that often exists between black residents and Asian merchants.Does this mean Lu's wife must now face neighborhood ostracism on charges of "insensitivity"? Again, this is all speculation, but isn't it possible that she's in a grief-stricken state, and that seeing stuff being piled up on the sidewalk wasn't her idea of a proper memorial? But it is the neighbor who now says he has been "hurt." Isn't it possible that a woman whose husband was murdered two days ago is feeling a little more hurt? Or am I engaging in "insensitive" speculations? I don't know anymore, but it strikes me that if anyone deserves the benefit of the doubt on sensitivity here, it ought to be the victims. In that regard, the Inquirer touches on something that must be really painful for the daughter to contemplate. When last year's robbery charges were thrown out, it may have been because Philadelphia bureaucrats didn't make much of an effort to help her testify: Lu LiXia recalled her father's last minutes.I can well understand the terror going through the mind of a robbery victim having to show up and wait for hours in a situation like that, and I find myself wondering whether every effort was made by the City of Philadelphia to assist her, or if maybe they didn't care whether she showed up. As to Commissioner Johnson, he says he doesn't know: As far as the teen allegedly robbing the place before, Johnson would only say they arrested the teen for it and they found a gun but he doesn't know what happened in court.Well, someone ought to know. Even if the witness was frightened, the police had the gun. Like many other crimes, this one could have been prevented had the criminal justice system simply done its job properly in the first place. I keep reading about crime after crime committed by released criminals. In Connecticut, a pair of recently paroled convicts are accused of.... ...breaking into the suburban Cheshire home of Dr. William Petit Jr. on July 23, holding his wife and two daughters hostage and terrorizing them for nearly six hours.No shooting, though. So despite the abominable and horrific nature of the crime, there will be no accompanying cry for gun control which already exists. And I doubt anyone will be heard to say that these were good men (even though one of them seems to have been adopted by a highly cultured family.) Likewise, there will be no claim of good-man-led-astray-by-uncontrolled-guns in this murder case: A pregnant South Jersey woman who was run down by an enraged motorist's SUV as her horrified husband watched has died of her injuries, police said.Had Yator shot this same woman, people would be decrying the "easy availability" of guns it would have been a felony for him to possess. That's because guns make good people go bad and break the gun control laws which don't work because the guns are so awful they make the good people on parole for committing crimes they didn't want to commit go out and break the laws against having guns -- even though they don't want to do that either. This means that we need to make it illegal for good people to have guns! That way, everyone who has a gun will be automatically guilty of a gun crime (and bad), and the good people who don't have guns can join forces to defeat the common enemy of 200-plus million guns. As for me, I just keep having a mental stumbling block. Why can't I understand that guns are way more evil than criminals? posted by Eric on 08.11.07 at 10:54 AM
Comments
It wasn't the guns, it was the evil SUV. They not only destroy nature, they turn their drivers into killers. Doug_s · August 11, 2007 03:48 PM It wasn't the guns, it was the evil SUV. They not only destroy nature, they turn their drivers into killers. Doug_s · August 11, 2007 03:48 PM I think your problem is that you suffer from too much common sense. You need to go back to school at some liberal arts college and take all the classes then end in "Studies" to cure yourself of this dread affliction. A couple of classes in "African-American Studies" (assuming they would let you in), "Women's Studies" (ditto) and the like and you will lose all the common sense you ever had. joated · August 11, 2007 07:42 PM It's the message ... guns are evil; remove the guns. Now we MUST depend on the government to protect us and we can do nothing about it when they fail. Power to the people, given that they are the certain people who deserve the power. mdmhvonpa · August 13, 2007 09:44 AM It definitely was insensitive of the late Mr. Lu to be suspicious that he may be robbed by young black men even though he was previous robbed by young black men. nobody important · August 13, 2007 12:49 PM Every damn time, "He was a good boy, he never hurt anyone." And so forth. Never mind the previous record, everything was obviously the fault of the deceased. Or in the cases where the victim fought back and killed the attacker, the victim was a racist bastard and ought to be in jail for killing 'the poor kid'. Firehand · August 13, 2007 04:56 PM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
August 2007
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
August 2007
July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Doin' the Lambert walk
It's not the details that matter in reporting! Putting property before people Propaganda Wise Deinstitutionalization The Barry Bonds Harry Potter Greenhouse effect Monica does Fred The Call what page am I on? The Default Interpretation
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Why can't I understand that guns are way more evil than criminals?
Probably because your experience has probably been like mine. For some bizarre reason, my wee wifey's revolver has only prevented a crime, never caused one, and the same is true of the guns owned by people I know.