|
August 01, 2005
Iraq war
I'm not much of a war blogger (because I don't think war should be a debate). But there's this one seemingly neutral, war-related phrase I've been seeing so often that it's now making my antennae go up every time I see it, because I'm suspicious of the sneaky way it's misuse is creeping into the lexicon. The phrase is "Iraq War veteran." Nothing political or manipulative about that, and on its face it doesn't seem as if it would be subject to political ownership by one "side" or another -- any more than, say, "World War II veteran." But remember "Vietnam War veteran"? For many years if not decades, that phrase was a catchword for a variety of social ills such as drug addiction, alcoholism, homelessness, post-traumatic stress, and even crime to the extent that crimes were committed by this gigantic, omnipresent population of untreated misfits. In reality, most Vietnam vets were and are surprisingly normal. But problems get the attention, and few people ever bothered to check whether there was a causal connection between a problem and service in Vietnam. Or even whether the problem person in fact served in Vietnam as alleged. Google the phrase "Iraq War veteran" and you'll get over 30,000 hits. While I know this is not scientifically conclusive, I tried adding more words to the phrase to to search for correlations with various topics of interest. The latter association interested me, and I discovered that several Iraq War veterans have acheived quasi-celebrity status for anti-war activism: Before this morning, I had never heard of Delgado, Mejia, or Benderman, and I really didn't want to. I could be wrong, but the whole thing is striking me as a possible product of the old "Vietnam Veterans" antiwar machine -- as if graying activists are trying to find and fill a new ecological niche. (Indeed, Googling "Iraq War veterans" and Vietnam yields another 11,000-plus hits.) This is getting off track, and I think that's enough about celebrity activists I'd rather not have ever heard of. Back to "Iraq war veteran" Google associations. I also found: Not wanting to limit my search with things which would be considered overly negative, I also tried Googling a couple of words many would associate with "positive" stereotypes (perhaps what many veterans might want associated with themselves) but came up a bit short: I know. It's a bit silly, but my concerns relate to negative stereotyping, so why not at least make a stab at a search for the other side. (Hey, at least I'm not Googling for "Iraq war veterans" Mom "the flag" and "Apple pie." Oh, what the hell! I tried them together, and I got six.) Anyway, I know this isn't scientific, but if you searched only on the Internet, you'd think that anyone who fought in this war was either an activist against it, or someone needing professional care of some sort. This makes me wonder out loud (and rhetorically) whether the Internet reflects actual reality, or activists' reality. I mean, in the last election the troops -- and military veterans -- voted overwhelmingly for Bush (and, presumably, for the war). And that was despite the fact that Bush insulted them by serving up plastic Thanksgiving turkeys. Can a phrase like "Iraq War veteran" be owned by anyone? Is it a proprietary thing destined to occupy a niche like "Vietnam War Veteran"? Of might this be tied to the ultimate fate of the war itself? I don't know, but I hate it when ordinary words become insider code language. (I'm almost tempted to say that it goes against my values, but I won't dare....) posted by Eric on 08.01.05 at 09:39 AM
Comments
I am award-winning journalist with a project, Ruminations on America (www.ruminationsonamerica.blogspot.com). I have called for essays from coast to coast on true core values and the current state of the union and I would like to invite you and your readers to participate. The last few essays might interest you greatly as well (including the essay Camilo Mejia wrote for Iraq Veterans Against the War about Sergeant Benderman and an essay from a Veterans for Peace member who rode to Crawford with Cindy Sheehan). Rita J. King · August 18, 2005 12:43 AM |
|
March 2007
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
March 2007
February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
From mourners to suspects overnight. Who knew?
Educating Diplomats soft spot for crocs? "I Bet The NY Times will jump on this" "slaughter" committed by "high caliber" "automatics" Balancing the polls Despite "dog overpopulation," there's a puppy shortage Squeezing Iran First they came for our elephants.... Hillary's favorite opponent?
Links
Site Credits
|
|
If they're not turncoats like a certain Senator from Hanoi, then they will be portrayed as drooling dope-addicted homicidal maniacs with blood-shot eyes. During World War II, the Nazi fifth column in America also tried to recruit returning veterans. I'm against that.
I salute every one of our brave veterans in this an every one of our Wars. America, patriotism, the Flag -- and our brave soldiers. Heroes. Freedom.