|
March 26, 2007
Squeezing Iran
The Washington Post reports: Iran Feels Pinch As Major Banks Curtail Business. More than 40 major international banks and financial institutions have either cut off or cut back business with the Iranian government or private sector as a result of a quiet campaign launched by the Treasury and State departments last September, according to Treasury and State officials.What are the dangers? Any project started now could be repudiated by the next government in Iran. Who is scaring the bankers the most? Iran's President. The feller I like to refer to as Ahmanutjob. Ahmadinejad's rhetoric -- from denying the Holocaust to comparing Iran's stock exchange to gambling -- has helped, experts say. "There is very little foreign investment in Iran not because of sanctions, but because of the atmosphere created by Ahmadinejad's crazy statements," said Jahangir Amuzegar, former Iranian finance minister and executive director of the International Monetary Fund.In recent news a possible naval blockade due to the capture of 15 Bitish marines by the Iranians could hasten their decline. The Bush administration has taken several other actions in recent months to contain Iran, including deploying two Navy carrier strike groups near the Persian Gulf, arresting operatives of the Revolutionary Guards' al-Quds Force in Iraq and pressing for two U.N. resolutions to punish Iran for not suspending its uranium enrichment program.Iran is having problems with its gasoline supply. For another it is not maintaining its oil production infrastructure. Iranian net oil output is declining at better than 10% a year. By no later than 2015 its net oil output will be zero. Since oil accounts for 80% of Iran's export revenues the pinch is already starting to hurt and will only get worse. In December, Iranian oil minister Kazem Vaziri Hamaneh acknowledged that Tehran was having trouble financing petroleum development projects. "Currently, overseas banks and financiers have decreased their cooperation," he told the oil ministry news agency Shana.This is a regime on the decline. The question is how fast. In the early days of any blockade the pinch does not seem serious. The longer things go on the more trouble multiplies. Production is cut in industry A due to lack of resources which affects industry B which has not felt the external crimp. This cascades. Iranian importers are particularly feeling the pinch, with many having to pay for commodities in advance when a year ago they could rely on a revolving line of credit, said Patrick Clawson, a former World Bank official now at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy. The scope of Iran's vulnerability has been a surprise to U.S. officials, he added.America has a lock on the international banking system. Only friends get to play. Let me add the biggest risk factor. What do socialist countries (which Iran is) do when economics gets tough? They nationalize. i.e. they steal the investment. Returns have to be very high to make such risks worth while. H/T Captain's Quarters where ajacksonian has left a very good comment, as have others. Cross Posted at Power and Control posted by Simon on 03.26.07 at 05:25 PM
Comments
ajacksonian, I think you are right. Last year Iran withdrew fronm Europe $30 bn in gold and cash. Still, fragmenting the opposition and reviving Iran as a modern state has its merits. This is going to be long and expensive. M. Simon · March 27, 2007 05:05 PM Bosnia is trying to shut down the training camps there, but the high level of infiltration into the region since the early '90s also points to problems in Albania and Kosovo. Russia has started to get worried about Chechnya, and the aQ and Iranian camps there... they haven't been able to do anything about those for years, now. If we are seeing more ties to organized crime via Hezbollah and any more movement into the narcotics and other illegal trades in S. America and Africa, then the long term sustainable base for everything save Lebanon will be done. That is their big resource eater, right now. They want nuclear weapons now to *use* them immediately... but their long-term welcome in Lebanon is even being questioned by the people in southern Lebanon who say that nothing has been done FOR THEM by Hezbollah. It seems that when the money starts to run out, your friends do to... At least we can semi keep track of Iran as a Nation. The various Hezbollah, Islamic Jihad and other off-shoots are far less amenable to that and likely to be stopped. Centralized facilities we can get... organized and distributed terrorism needs an organized and distributed system to get it, which is *not* the modern Armed Forces. ajacksonian · March 29, 2007 10:25 AM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
April 2007
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
April 2007
March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
the artificial maintainence of "unnatural" pollination?
A weapons neurosis beats the end of the world? shameful contagion? Crow for conspicuous virgin virtue! "Liberty turns lethal" ("OK, let's turn it around.") False Report We Will Not Let It Fall To Violence Climate Apocalypse - With A Good Beat We Are Doomed - Again More dangerous than criminals?
Links
Site Credits
|
|
My major worry that seems to be a bit overlooked is that the regime in Iran actually has little investment in Iran as a Nation, and more into the entire terror network they have created. The work to get the connections made in Eastern Europe, Russia, Africa, Oceania (broadly speaking), Far East and South America all point to enabling this network to continue onwards once Iran falls. I do not discount Lebanon, but that is a high price, low return affair that has yielded very little and cost a large amount to Iran. More important is their ongoing relationship to Syria, which they may be expecting to fall back upon, but may find Syria suddenly hostile if the money goes away. Syria is an old hand at playing larger Nations for the fool and then not having to do one thing for them once the money stops.
The connections the network has made with other terrorist organizations, like the GIA and FARC, plus with Far Eastern Triads and Eastern European mafias all point to an expectation of a long terrorist campaign that can be self-funded once Iran is unable to supply funds. Their investment in Iran, is minimal, which points to a low expectation and outlook on the people there.
I have this strange feeling that just before everything goes to hell, the regime will just slip away to its affiliated terrorist groups and continue on their longer term mission of bringing their repressive form of Islam across the globe. All the fallback positions are set. An end to the regime in Iran is *not* an end to the threats that it has started up...