|
|
|
|
July 31, 2005
Definitions impossible, dialogue impenetrable, forget logic!
Any Muslim that denies that terror is a part of Islam is kafir [an unbeliever]So claims the militant Islamic organization al-Ghurabaa. On his talk radio show the other day, a frustrated Michael Graham made the following statement: Sadly, as it is constituted today, Islam IS a terrorist organization, but the good news is that the major of Muslims--who don't support terror--can change that and take back their religion.Following that remark, a major campaign was launched by CAIR, resulting in Graham's suspension. Now CAIR wants Graham fired. Little Green Footballs and Mens News Daily have more, and Graham elaborates in a column here. From Tim Blair, there's this bit of unfriendly logic -- that if a non-Muslim is friends with a Muslim, then the Muslim isn't a Muslim: There’s no such thing as a Muslim having a non-Muslim friend, so a non-Muslim could be your associate but they can’t be a friend. They’re not your friend because they don’t understand your religious principles and they cannot because they don’t understand your faith. (Via Glenn Reynolds.) Trying to analyze this thing is like walking a tightrope. There's so little room for anything resembling even dialogue, much less compromise -- even over the most basic definitions. Islam, it seems, cannot be called anything -- whether moderate, radical, religion of war, or religion of peace -- without offending lots of Muslims (and plenty of non-Muslims). It isn't so much a question of what the right answer is. There may be no right answer, but being right isn't the point.
![]() I mean, what's really to discuss? If moderate Muslims aren't Muslims and aren't allowed to be friends, what's to do? posted by Eric on 07.31.05 at 07:27 PM
Comments
Much of American moslems must really be in a quandry...there is going to come a time when they can't equivocate anymore and I consider the American "fatwa" too equivocating on major points. They cannot live in America and wish for the destruction of the Constitution and the imposition of Shar'ia and still consider themselves American. Those that want to keep their faith and still be Americans are going to have to be forced by the rest of us in standing up and making a break with the rest of the world about Islam. No more foreign imans, eschew the ideology of dar ul Harb and dar ul Islam, reject the precepts of Waqf, hudna and Shar'ia that must be imposed on everyone. Yes, it will make them apostate in the eyes of the worldwide Islam, but it is the only thing I see for Islam to remain in the US at all. Any more attacks on US soil from Islamists and the religion will/should be considered no different than homegrown hate groups...KKK or Christian Identity. Darleen · August 1, 2005 12:48 AM The vast majority of Muslims would not enjoy living under Sharia, nor do they have any desire to. Especially in America. The problem is this: In some particularly important ways, Islam is a lot like Reform Judaism (my faith).
Which is, you might say, a distinctly American way of experiencing my religion. It's the same way for plenty of American Muslims.
Michael Graham is full of shit, and he actively impedes the war on terror by obscuring who the real enemy is -- Extremist Islamists. Joe · August 1, 2005 03:43 AM Ditto what Joe said. Michael Graham is nothing more than a shock-jock whose sole purpose is to get attention the easiest way possible -- by insulting people, saying stupid things, and smiling smugly as everyone else allows him to bend an important debate to his small-minded desires. WMAL's listener-share has been tanking since last year's election, and Graham's divisive stupidity is entirely for the purpose of increasing ratings. Raging Bee · August 1, 2005 11:08 AM As has been repeated for decades, but rarely observed in-practice, "... The Bill of Rights is not a suicide pact." Ted B. · August 1, 2005 05:22 PM Darleen and Ted B.: Absolutely true. Steven Malcolm Anderson the Lesbian-worshipping man's-man-admiring myth-based egoist · August 1, 2005 06:12 PM Darleen wrote: The Communist party, too, and its fronts. And the German-American Bund during World War II. We are at War for the very survival of America and the West, and you are either 100% on our side or else 100% on the side of the enemy, and must be treated accordingly. Steven Malcolm Anderson the Lesbian-worshipping man's-man-admiring myth-based egoist · August 1, 2005 06:16 PM 90+% of them are "100% on our side", Steven. Frankly, though, I question the loyalty of white Americans, too. They haven't necessarily put enough effort into supporting this war; not enough modification to behavior. No victory gardens, yet. That would suggest that while they nominally support us, many (most?) are not "100% on our side", and would by your logic be "100% on the side of the enemy".
Joe · August 2, 2005 05:42 AM What soes "white" have to do with anything? Islam is an ideology, not a "race". Steven Malcolm Anderson the Lesbian-worshipping man's-man-admiring myth-based egoist · August 2, 2005 01:35 PM I see that most Leftists reduce everything to either 1) money (Marx) or 2) skin color (Hitler). A mile wide and a nanometer deep. This War is not about race or economics, it is a spiritual War. Steven Malcolm Anderson the Lesbian-worshipping man's-man-admiring myth-based egoist · August 2, 2005 05:52 PM 'This War is not about race or economics, it is a spiritual War.' Stewart · August 2, 2005 10:46 PM |
|
March 2007
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
March 2007
February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
From mourners to suspects overnight. Who knew?
Educating Diplomats soft spot for crocs? "I Bet The NY Times will jump on this" "slaughter" committed by "high caliber" "automatics" Balancing the polls Despite "dog overpopulation," there's a puppy shortage Squeezing Iran First they came for our elephants.... Hillary's favorite opponent?
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Heil Allah? I have had it with this endless talk (ever since 9/11/2001) about "moderate" Muslims. I say to every Muslim: Either you are 100% on our side or else you are 100% on the side of the terrorists, and then you are my enemy and I am yours.