Some things I'm not fortunate enough to forget....

It's poetry review time, like it or not!

(Which means that it's time to analyze drivel -- which I tend to hate....)

An unfortunate truth about me is that I'm really not all that into poetry. But John Kerry came to Philadelphia yesterday and in a speech to the NAACP, singled out in a praiseworthy manner not one but two Stalin apologists. That offends my low standards. I might have been willing to overlook one. You know, nobody's perfect, and, of course, "mistakes were made."

But two? That's too many!

The two in question were W.E.B. DuBois and Langston Hughes. As to DuBois, his love of Stalin and Communism and his malevolent anti-Americanism are not open to serious dispute (see my previous post on the subject). Here's Kerry's reference to DuBois:

W.E.B. Du Bois talked about the two Americas years ago. He called it "a nation within a nation." John Edwards and I have talked about that divide for many years now.

Our job, between now and November is to end the division between the fortunate America and the forgotten America. We must come together to build one America.

What "nation within a nation" was DuBois talking about? Here's PBS:
Du Bois moved increasingly to the left in his political thinking, embracing a Marxist analysis of black labor in the United States and eventually advocating a "nation within a nation" form of black economic separatism or cooperation during the Great Depression. In 1944, in his mid-seventies, Du Bois declared that he would spend "the remaining years of [his] active life" in the fight against imperialism.
I'm not at all sure that Kerry understands what the "nation within a nation" meant. DuBois wanted to create one, and Kerry thinks he referred to an existing one.

Here's more:

In contrast to Garvey, Du Bois believes in the existence of “a dual identity or ‘double consciousness’ that is both African and American, and, consequently rejects black nationalism proper.” Du Bois makes no suggestion that Black Americans should “return” to Africa, but that they actually have more right to call themselves American since they did the bulk of the work to build America. However, his nationalist ideas are similar to Garvey’s in relation to his beliefs of “origins” and the historical basis of modern Black identity. When he discusses beginnings “he makes a number of claims about the superiority of Africa,” and like Garvey “he professes that more so than other groups, Africans advanced ‘from animal savagery toward primitive civilization.’” Du Bois sees African Americans as a “protonation” not yet realized, a “nation within a nation,” and “privileges an African Gemeinschaft (an organic community based on kinship) over the European Gesellschaft (a rationalized, mechanistic community).”
DuBois is considered by many to be the father of multiculturalism, and hence his "nation within a nation" idea must be seen within that context:
Du Bois (1933) conceptualization of Pan Africanism was based on anti-racist, anti-colonial, anti-imperialism and for "the industrial and spiritual emancipation of Negro people (p. 247)." As Gbadegesin notes (1996), Pan Africanist movement took its roots from "the social heritage of insult in slavery and colonial exploitation (p. 233)." Du Bois organized five Pan-African conferences, in 1911, 1921, 1923, 1927 and in 1945 to emphasize the collective work of Africans, African Americans and the colonized people of the world. In order to combat colonialism, Du Bois urged people of African descent to put aside language, cultural, religious differences to unite for a common struggle. Within the context of Pan Africanism, Du Bois collaborated with Ghanaian leader Nkrumah in attempts to organize collective struggles of Africans and African Americans. As noted by Moses (1994), Du Bois’s political views were deeply grounded within Afrocentric thoughts, particular within African music, history, spirituality, etc. Du Bois viewed African communalism and collective nature of family useful within the African American context. For Du Bois, knowledge from the continent of Africa was important for Black resistance in the United States, which he called a "nation within a nation."
So perhaps, in fairness to Kerry, the reason he and Edwards have "talked about that divide for many years now" is, as Kerry claims, to "end the division between the fortunate America and the forgotten America" and "come together to build one America." If so, it will mark a new moment in Democratic Party politics, as multiculturalism is based not on ending divisions but creating them.

Again, I'd be a little more willing to trust Kerry if it weren't for the fact that he goes on to quote a second Stalin apologist, the poet Langston Hughes:

The great poet Langston Hughes put it this way:

Let America be America again...Let it be the dream it used to be...for those whose sweat and blood, whose faith and pain, whose hand at the foundry, whose plow in the rain must bring back our mighty dream again.

With your help, in 2004, we can...we must...we will...bring back our mighty dream again.

Stirring words of praise. "Let America be America again" sounds like a hell of a campaign slogan too! (It is, of course, Kerry's campaign theme.)

But what does it mean? Here are some lines Kerry omitted:

Who said the free? Not me?
Surely not me? The millions on relief today?
The millions shot down when we strike?
The millions who have nothing for our pay?
For all the dreams we've dreamed
And all the songs we've sung
And all the hopes we've held
And all the flags we've hung,
The millions who have nothing for our pay--
Except the dream that's almost dead today.


.....From those who live like leeches on the people's lives,
We must take back our land again,
America!

O, yes,
I say it plain,
America never was America to me,
And yet I swear this oath--
America will be!

Out of the rack and ruin of our gangster death,
The rape and rot of graft, and stealth, and lies,
We, the people, must redeem
The land, the mines, the plants, the rivers.
The mountains and the endless plain--
All, all the stretch of these great green states--
And make America again!

Aside from the Marxist sentiments, it's inherent in the poem that the word "again" is used mockingly -- for Hughes makes clear that America never was the way he wants to remake it; the reason for the word "again" is to give lie to the despicable and hypocritical American Dream (which fellow Stalin-lovers know to be a cruel myth).

Timothy Noah recently reminded the Kerry forces not only of the underlying Stalinist sentiments, but of the lie inherent in Langston Hughes' chorus of "Let America be America again." It's not nostalgia, as the poet makes abundantly clear by stating over and over again that it "never was." Rather, the poem's goal is to remake America into something it never was: a Stalinist workers' paradise:

Anyone who takes the time to read "Let America Be America Again" will quickly understand that its entire thrust is that nostalgia for a golden age of American freedom is a crock. In the poem, idealized paeans to "the dream [America] used to be" alternate with parenthetical responses exposing the harsher reality ("America never was America to me"). Who is this angry dissenter? Hughes answers in a voice that echoes Walt Whitman's:
I am the poor white, fooled and pushed apart,
I am the Negro bearing slavery's scars.
I am the red man driven from the land,
I am the immigrant clutching the hope I seek—
and so on. Rather than pretend America ever was the land of the free (remember, this was written by a black man in the Jim Crow era), Hughes urges his heterogeneous countrymen to fulfill for the first time America's promise of freedom:
America never was America to me,
And yet I swear this oath—America will be!
"Let America Be America Again," you may have noticed, is not one of Hughes' better efforts. Like a lot of poetry written during the Great Depression, it's didactic and influenced by naive admiration for the Soviet experiment.
Is that what Kerry wants? I'm sure he'd deny it, but when he goes out of his way to laud two Stalin apologists, and makes a poem by one of them the center theme of his campaign, I find it unsettling.

I don't want to live in a workers' paradise where the state owns the means of production. This country is too close to that already.

The fortunate versus the forgotten?

I don't know how to analyze such phraseology; like much of what Kerry says it defies rational analysis. How, for example, does one determine whether one is "fortunate" or "forgotten"? Are these two words opposites? It strikes me as a waste of time to get into a lengthy discussion over whether one can be forgotten as well as fortunate. (Some are very fortunate to be forgotten, while others are very unfortunate to be remembered....)

But I will say this: Communism was unfortunate, and it should not be forgotten.

Why praise those who supported it?

UPDATE: Might the key to successful interpretation (of the Hughes poem and campaign theme) lie somewhere in Kerry's heart?

"The question, setting aside the campaign, is: Where is John Kerry's heart?" said Kagan, who has advocated a muscular U.S. approach to world affairs. "My sense is his heart is in the anti-Vietnam, '70s-'80s left." (Via Glenn Reynolds.)
Again?

Yes Again! (Indeed.)

UPDATE (in reverse order): If you want more 70's nostalgia, you won't be disappointed. Just keep scrolling to the last post. Justin wrote it, and I think it's a real gem.

posted by Eric on 07.16.04 at 08:51 AM





TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://classicalvalues.com/cgi-bin/pings.cgi/1188



Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Some things I'm not fortunate enough to forget....:

» The MSM and the DPRK from Kobayashi Maru
Philosophical sympathy between the MSM and Kim Jong-il seems to be fresher and more blatant than I'd imagined. John Hinderaker over at Powerline has done a superbly thorough fisking of Barbara Demick's outrageous LA Times article that I won't even at... [Read More]
Tracked on March 4, 2005 09:51 AM



Comments

"Communism was unfortunate, and it should not be forgotten."

You said it all.

Would a Rightist politician have gotten a pass if he had quoted Ezra Pound? Hmmm....

One Negro who is forgotten today is Manning Johnson, who broke with Communism and joined the John Birch Society. He wrote a book "Color, Communism, and Common Sense", "...the story of one Negro who went through the fire and came out tempered steel...."

He was a deep Christian, a friend of the Rev. Dr. Billy James Hargis, and his favorite hymn was "The Old Rugged Cross".

He testified before the House Un-American Activities Committee on Communist infiltration in the churches:

"It is an axiom in Communist organization strategy that if an infiltrated body has 1% Communist Party members and 9% Communist Party sympathizers, with well-rehearsed plans of action, they can effectively control the remaining 90% who think and act on an individual basis. In the large sections of the religious field, due to the ideological poison which has been filtered in by Communists and pro-Communists through seminaries, the backlog of sympathizers and mental prisoners of socialistic ideology is greater than the 10 percent necessary for effective control."

How true that is. And, once again -- the _style_! I keep thinking of how so many of the crackpot warnings of the Birchite Far Right of the 1950s, 1960s, and early 1970s have turned out to be so palpably true today. The National Council of Churches, the U.N., "sensitivity training" -- all are today instruments of One-Worldism and Political Correctness, a.k.a., neo-Communism.

I am proudly one who thinks and acts on an individual basis rather than a mental prisoner of socialistic ideology.



December 2006
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31            

ANCIENT (AND MODERN)
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR


Search the Site


E-mail




Classics To Go

Classical Values PDA Link



Archives




Recent Entries



Links



Site Credits