|
July 12, 2004
Building a better world
Over the past few days, the Philadelphia Inquirer has been -- as the NAACP holds its convention here -- glorifying W.E.B. DuBois . And in vintage Marxist terms like this: ....[S]ince the 1980s, the maldistribution of income in the United States has become greater in favor of the rich than in any other modern democracy, and it is rapidly growing worse. Corporate profits have incurable elephantiasis. CEOs receive huge bonuses that have nothing to do with their often poor performance. Employees work harder for less pay, and there is less work for more people. Much of higher education is now priced so far above the means of middle-class Americans as to be available, if at all, only through crushing indebtedness. In the American political climate of 2004, it is all but impossible to have a meaningful debate on taxes for social-democratic initiatives. There are permanent open seasons on affirmative action and women's reproductive rights. To NAACP Board Chairman Julian Bond, DuBois is a hero. But then, Bond believes that Communist Party leaders James and Esther Jackson are "a model of what Black youth should and ought to do." Here's Bond on "Bush and other Republicans": NAACP chairman Julian Bond, speaking to lawmakers and business leaders in Indiana last month, said Bush and other Republicans appealed to a racist "dark underside of American culture."OK, fair enough. Or unfair enough, depending on your perspective. (Until today I never knew there was such a thing as a Confederate swastika.) It's all relative, isn't it? So is truth, and DuBois was -- always -- an utterer of truth! Always an utterer of difficult and unpopular truths, Du Bois's writing still has the ring of prophecy come true. "The inflexible truth he embraced was that, just as Africans in the United States 'under the corporate rule of monopolized wealth ... will be confined to the lowest wage group,' so the peoples of the developing world faced subordination in the global scheme of things capitalist."According to Bond and the NAACP, Bush is the demon of the dark underside. No doubt if he were alive today, DuBois would agree. Doubtless so would many of Bond's other Communist heroes. But what kind of people did DuBois admire? Who were his heroes? Here's W.E.B. DuBois, uttering the truth about Joseph Stalin: Joseph Stalin was a great man; few other men of the 20th century approach his stature. He was simple, calm and courageous. He seldom lost his poise; pondered his problems slowly, made his decisions clearly and firmly; never yielded to ostentation nor coyly refrained from holding his rightful place with dignity. He was the son of a serf but stood calmly before the great without hesitation or nerves. But also - and this was the highest proof of his greatness - he knew the common man, felt his problems, followed his fate.Um, yeah, Stalin definitely drove them out. They were exterminated. But you didn't really have to be a kulak: In reality however, the term "kulak" was a loose term to describe anyone who opposed collectivisation, which included many peasants who were anything but rich.If Stalin were alive today, the term "kulak" might even include many members of the NAACP. Not the leadership, of course. They're the ones who get to do the defining. And the judging. And if we move the (very elitist) DuBois into the 21st Century, his semi-official biographer offers an insight into what such a judgment might be: But in a world today where we are supposedly moving beyond race, I think you would hear Dubois modify that and say that people of color must be judged by the content of their politics.I don't doubt one bit that DuBois would say that. Nor do I doubt that much of the NAACP leadership agrees with it. Much as I abhor ending on a note of irony, I think it fair to ask why the NAACP refuses to take a position on gay marriage. Bond thinks it's just as well: When the NAACP opens its national convention here today, one of the hottest issues of the moment - same-sex marriage - will be nowhere on its agenda.Might they be breathing a sigh of relief that President Bush didn't attend? There are a lot of people who think there are bigger issues than gay marriage. The NAACP obviously thinks socialism is a bigger issue. In a way, they're right. Which is why I think opposing socialism is a bigger issue. If I lose my economic freedom and my property rights, what's the point of a legal relationship with the ostensible purpose of protecting them?
I write in longhand; I consider the computer a television set with a keyboard.Gee. I thought my computer was more like a Gutenberg press than a television set, but what do I know? I hate television! posted by Eric on 07.12.04 at 10:26 AM
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://classicalvalues.com/cgi-bin/pings.cgi/1174 Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Building a better world:
» Bush Snubs NAACP (And Rightfully So) from dcthornton.com
Why should anybody kiss up to fringe-left operatives like Mfume and Bond? [Read More] Tracked on July 13, 2004 07:11 PM
Comments
I was just reminded that unless I had ancestors murdered by Stalin, I have no moral right to complain about "the past" here. And if I did, then I am taking these things too personally. Now why didn't I think of that? The problem is that I am not "dwelling on the past." The rehabilitation of Stalinists like DuBois and (as you highlight) Paul Robeson is quite mainstream. In fact, DuBois biographer David Levering Lewis is a major Robeson booster, and Rutgers (where he's a tenured professor) is home to the Paul Robeson Cultural Center. I haven't heard of this center before, but I think you might enjoy peeking at some of their links.... Eric Scheie · July 12, 2004 03:59 PM Thanks again, Varius! I was so caught up with DuBois that I wasn't thinking about Rutgers, but your Robeson remark triggered my memory about rampant anti-Semitism there. (Via InstaPundit.) Last year, the day after former Gulag prisoner Natan Sharansky was assaulted with a pie, swastikas were spray-painted on Rutgers Hillel. Stalin would be proud of his progeny, I think... Eric Scheie · July 12, 2004 04:33 PM It seems that at the Robeson center culture is the domain of the hyphenated American. And then it is further limited to the prefixes african-, arab-, asian-, latin-, and native-. I often need to be reminded that I have no culture because I'm white. DWEMs be damned! Varius Contrarius · July 13, 2004 12:46 PM If anyone wants a "modern-day civil-rights cause," they can look to the gay men who are too busy trying to avoid getting beaten to death to even think about getting married. Raging Bee · July 14, 2004 04:37 PM |
|
December 2006
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
December 2006
November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Laughing at the failure of discourse?
Holiday Blogging The right to be irrational? I'm cool with the passion fashion Climate change meltdown at the polls? If you're wrong, then so is God? Have a nice day, asshole! Scarlet "R"? Consuming power while empowering consumption Shrinking is growth!
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Communism among established leaders and prominent stars was long a hindrance for American blacks. I'm reminded of Paul Robeson, who defended his support for Stalin after the revelation of genocide and other crimes by saying, "The coach tells you what to do and you do it."
He was rightly shunned by the new wave of civil rights leaders who finally began to make real progress in the 1960s, and yet there are many people who maintain that he was a heroic and important figure in the fight. He witnessed firsthand that the image of the Soviet dream was a lie, yet kept maintained the illusion, content a contented slave to socialist ideology:
"[S]everal celebrities who had given their influential imprimatur to the Stalin regime suffered subsequent pangs of conscience. Probably the most outstanding example of post-Stalinist contrition was Paul Robeson. The peerless Black singer and actor spent his declining years in a state of paranoid depression conceivably brought on by gnawing remorse over his role as self-deluded accessory to a KGB-engineered deception. In 1952 at the height of Stalin’s antisemitic campaign Robeson was officially invited to Moscow. At a restaurant the KGB produced one of the victimised Yiddish writers – briefly released from the Lubjanka, ‘force-fed’ and given sunlamp treatment – for Robeson to interview. At the meal the writer was distant and silent, whereas his voluble ‘translator’ gave Robeson all sorts of assurances. The singer believed the lie because he wanted to believe it. On his return to the US he maintained that the allegedly jailed Yiddish writers in the USSR were at liberty, and condemned the American papers’ biased reporting."
The civil rights movement was a success when instead of supporting the communism's patently brutal and inhumane "revolution," it acted on rational principals (fully in line with the founding principals of the United States) and, like Gandhi in India, exploited the best of Thoreau's civil disobedience to circumvent whatever injustice stood in the way.
It would be a pity to see the established leadership take up the communist mantle again and play the politics of race identity, fully subverting the individuality of American Blacks.