|
November 30, 2010
Life, liberty, and the pursuit of....
...mental illness? I have to say, Clayton Cramer dug up quite a gem here: It is proposed that happiness be classified as a psychiatric disorder and be included in future editions of the major diagnostic manuals under the new name: major affective disorder, pleasant type. In a review of the relevant literature it is shown that happiness is statistically abnormal, consists of a discrete cluster of symptoms, is associated with a range of cognitive abnormalities, and probably reflects the abnormal functioning of the central nervous system. One possible objection to this proposal remains--that happiness is not negatively valued. However, this objection is dismissed as scientifically irrelevant. [J Med Ethics 1992 Jun;18(2):94-8] [emphasis added]If we add the disease of "happiness" to that of depression, anxiety, OCD, and all the other mental diseases from which 20% of us are said to be suffering and could be medicated, we approach a mental illness saturation point. All of us are mentally ill. And each of us commits three felonies a day. Which means we are all criminally insane in the eyes of our rulers. So be happy in your pursuits! UPDATE: I was sent the text of Dr. Bentall's proposal to classify happiness as a mental disorder by an emailer who argued that it was parody, and who said: When something looks too silly to be true, it sometimes is, so it pays to look at it a bit more closely.I just did, and I find it a relief that he didn't himself maintain happiness is diseased. However, I don't think Bentall was being silly; he was making a very serious point. Looking closely at the text, it is obvious the author (himself a forensic clinical psychologist) was writing in protest of his profession's dominant narratives, and meant to ridicule them. Excerpt: once the debilitating consequences of happiness become widely recognised it is likely that psychiatrists will begin to devise treatments for the condition and we can expect the emergence of happiness clinics and anti-happiness medications in the not too distant future.Whether Dr. Bentall truly wanted happiness to be added to psychiatric disorders is not the point. He is arguing logically that by using his own colleagues' criteria, there is no reason not to consider happiness a form of mental illness, and I think he is right in that respect. It is a paradox. Moreover, Bentall (whose happiness paper generated much anger) is on record as saying that there is no clear line between the sick and the well: In Bentall's view, there is no clear boundary between the sick and the well. While this feels plausible for conditions such as anxiety and depression, the suggestion that psychotic experiences run through the general population on a continuum from bland normality to florid schizophrenia has always met with resistance from psychiatrists. The received view is that psychotic symptoms, such as hearing voices or believing that thoughts are being inserted into one's brain by alien forces, are by definition beyond the realm of ordinary experience.It makes about as much sense to say that happiness is mental illness as to say that sadness is mental illness. To take sadness further, if what they call "depression" can be a normal reaction to depressing events, then why aren't people who are happy in the face of depressing events even more abnormal than those who find themselves depressed? Is the rule along the lines of happy = good, and sad = bad? It's obvious that Bentall meant to issue a challenge to his profession, and in that respect, I think his paper is quite serious. At no point does he suggest that he wants to treat happiness as disease. Only that if his colleagues should -- if they practiced what they preached. And if they do as he suggests and we reach the saturation point, mental illness will have become the norm. posted by Eric on 11.30.10 at 11:05 PM
Comments
Meanwhile, Narcissistic Personality Disorder no longer is. Phelps · December 1, 2010 12:13 PM Hey, somebody has to be sane, or else who would be able to sit in judgment on the rest of us? Eric Scheie · December 1, 2010 12:22 PM You know who decides who's sane? The ones with the biggest artillery. Just ask Sakharov. Veeshir · December 1, 2010 12:26 PM Sanity is powerful! Eric Scheie · December 1, 2010 12:33 PM I didn't realize that was an NIH paper (Britain's socialized healthcare). That makes sense now. What's the cure for happiness? They really squared that circle. Veeshir · December 1, 2010 12:34 PM I can see an opening here for a new drug. M. Simon · December 1, 2010 04:45 PM Yeah - a depressant drug - mustn't let those pollyannas be happy. Just goes to prove that most psychiatrists are nuts. And all scousers. Kathy Kinsley · December 1, 2010 06:02 PM So those grim-faced models staring at me from the huge photos flanking the entrance to Abercrombie & Fitch are the "sane" ones? No, thanks. Darleen · December 1, 2010 08:37 PM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
December 2010
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
December 2010
November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Is that a cucumber in your underwear or are you just happy to be pickled?
Frozen in denial "you don't know who's enemy" Good Lovin Holiday Recipes Family Values What we call "privacy" is just an unclosed loophole The Sharp Edge Of Guilt Eric Told me I Could Do Shameless Self Promotion Hard Drugs
Links
Site Credits
|
|
So.... do they have any proposed cures for happiness?
Besides living in this world I mean.