|
November 07, 2010
A Clock Setback
In case you haven't heard we are now - for the winter - off daylight saving time. All your manual clocks need to be set back one hour. If that is a hassle - it is - may I suggest this radio controlled clock (sometimes called an atomic clock because it uses the American atomic time standard) from Amazon. The radio signal comes from WWVB near Boulder, Colorado. The frequency is 60 KHz. It updates the time every night so you are always within a second or so and it automatically does Daylight Savings Time. I have one and my first mate loves it. Unlike atomic clocks of the past it is very easy to set up. And this particular version is under $20. La Crosse Technology WT-3102B 10-Inch Atomic Analog Clock If you have one of these in your dwelling you will always have at least one clock with the right time. No need to try to figure out if it is fall back or spring forward. Cross Posted at Power and Control posted by Simon on 11.07.10 at 12:00 PM
Comments
We have all of those. My mate still loves the clock. M. Simon · November 8, 2010 04:28 AM Don't blame you. My most recent phone (Samsung T509) actually had a special announcement for me, to the effect that the time change had occurred, when I turned it on Sunday morning. How sweet. Like I needed to know my utensils were functioning as designed. :) I still had to update my microwave (ok, I'm OCD) and my bedroom clock radio, not to mention the dash clock in my car. What we really need are in-dash automobile clocks which don't need to be updated. Got into my car this afternoon, and nearly freaked out before I remembered the time change! Heh. What I truly enjoyed -back when I had a Sprint account- was that my Samsung phone not only kept accurate time, but the screen background changed according to time of day, with daylight, twilight, and night appearing at the appropriate moment. 'Twas a vi660, and if it hadn't cost $65 / month, I would have kept both the service and the phone. Casey · November 8, 2010 06:37 AM We got a neat little LED projection atomic clock off Amazon this year. We can always see the time on the ceiling now. TallDave · November 8, 2010 10:22 AM I like it. Good idea. Kathy Kinsley · November 8, 2010 05:48 PM I had the wooden version. Lasted about two years, as did a contemporaneous La Crosse weather station. Complete junk. ArtD0dger · November 8, 2010 09:54 PM Art, We have only had ours for 6 months. So you may be correct. But maybe you just got a bad one. Time will tell. M. Simon · November 8, 2010 10:50 PM Technical note: The clock problem you may be having Art is a weak battery. And/or improper placement. Because a microprocessor sets the clock good voltage is important - esp at start up. It is also important if you live more than 500 or 1,000 miles from Boulder to have the clock on a non-metalic wall that faces Boulder. That could mean that in some locations to get a strong enough signal the clock needs to be in a window. And you may also have to angle it to get a strong enough signal if your wall does not face Boulder within 10 degrees or so. Houses are usually built on a North/South Axis so look at a map and take the actual required direction into consideration. These clocks receive a low frequency RADIO signal. With all the technical considerations that entails. I'd love to know when you bought your clock and the failure mode. What was the battery voltage? It may be if you don't want to take the technical considerations into account a more expensive clock may be in order. M. Simon · November 8, 2010 11:20 PM M. Simon, since you are interested: I got the clock 4 or 5 years ago, so it was 2-3 years back when it died. It simply stopped running, and at first I just assumed the batteries were dead. However, it showed no sign of life with new batteries, even after I verified their orientation and checked them with a voltmeter. I'm pretty sure that was the first time I changed them. It seems like there were some buttons and other things to try, but I don't remember exactly. (I have a Ph.D. in electrical engineering, so I'd like to think I'm reasonably competent to perform such operations.) I set the clock aside and tried again a couple of months later, again with no luck. I also found no way to open the plastic mechanism compartment non-destructively, so I ended up not doing that either. I do not believe it was a radio problem because a) it should have just run along at the wrong time in the absence of a signal, and b) I live IN Boulder. I do recall a couple of times when it was working that it somehow synced to the wrong time by several whole hours, and then stayed that way for a while (a few hours?) before correcting itself. That doesn't seem like good behavior in a region where it should be getting a very strong radio signal. Chances are you will have better luck even if you have the same shoddy design. However, I will be looking for a different brand. Yes, it will probably be more expensive as La Crosse seems to dominate the low end for these things. Nothing I've seen has struck my fancy yet.
ArtD0dger · November 9, 2010 01:48 AM Art, Thanks. It is always fun discussing stuff like this with a pro. My understanding is that the design changed in 2007 or 2008. From the Amazon site - I haven't seen any reviews there that are recent. So it is possible they have fixed the problem you had. I do know that the chip of the earlier models was incorrectly programmed for the DST bit. Maybe they fixed your problem as well. I was just reading a Design News article about defective product. They suggested ALWAYS reporting problems to the dealer or mfg. I think that is a good idea. It is hard to fix field problems without feedback. BTW I'm an aerospace EE. Rockford, Illinois. M. Simon · November 9, 2010 02:21 AM Thanks, Simon, but sorry I don't have any big technical insight into this. Sounds like you've taken a lot more interest than I ever did -- it was just another broken bit of cheap-and-out-of-warranty consumer electronics to me. I've seen some pretty nifty presentations and articles about the time-keeping tech they do here, but I always assumed the radio transmissions were pretty conventional and boring. I just googled that it takes a full minute to transmit the 53 bit time code on the 60kHz carrier, and apparently it is quite primitive. On the other hand, it's pretty amazing they can cover the whole continent with a single transmitter. I must admit I made no attempt to provide feedback to La Crosse. I'm sure some of their engineers would have been glad to hear about it, but my experience is that the organization often shields them from such "distractions." ArtD0dger · November 9, 2010 04:43 AM I'm a big fan of WWVB. With proper calibration you can get time accurate to 10 ms and frequency to 1 part in 1E11. Pretty good for what is fundamentally (not in its modern incarnation) radio technology from the 1910 era. Back in 1910 the 60 KHz would have been generated by specially designed alternators. I believe they were called Andersen generators. In fact I'm working on a WWVB receiver in my spare time. So far I have a low noise antenna amplifier designed. I'm also working on a design for a PLL synced to the 60KHz that runs at 27 MHz. So in theory calibration of a local oscillator to 3E7 can be done in a second or so. Fun stuff. Of course the modern way is GPS. But I find the old stuff romantic. M. Simon · November 9, 2010 05:39 AM The European counterpart of WWVB is the DCF-77 transmitter near Frankfurt am Main, Germany. It transmits at 77.5 kHz and its range is about 1,000 miles. There is a wide choice of radio-controlled clocks over here, which use its signal. They are also built into higher-end cars. Never mind the fact that this transmitter also needs a full minute to transmit the date and time (in binary). After that, the receivers can use the radio signal itself for timekeeping. johan · November 9, 2010 11:52 AM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
November 2010
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
November 2010
October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
How to make the Tea Party support big government conservatism
Scapegoat Pink Triangles the war between the better and the worse "science and politics can't be divorced" Complete Charlie Foxtrot They Will Kill Gays Won't They A Process, Not An Event Close the prescription drug loophole! And close the First Amendment loophole! A Clock Setback
Links
Site Credits
|
|
...Or if you own a cell phone, or a personal computer which connects to the web... :)