|
August 05, 2010
My Experience Is Similar
From a comment at Dr. Helen's. Dr.D said...I can't say much about engineering school (I never went to one or finished college), but my experience in industry (aerospace engineering) is that most engineers tend to be libertarian/conservative with the libertarian faction predominating. That would be the socially liberal, economically conservative faction. Colloquially referred to as the pot smoking faction of the conservative movement. Also with a tendency to be gay friendly. Engineers don't care. Can you do the job faster than schedule and below budget is the only concern. Even meeting schedule and budget is considered a very good thing. Compare and contrast that with government. And then my friend Eric had this to say in the same thread. Eric said...I have noticed the same thing. Conservatives and I agree that government should be a good steward of the economy. The goal should be to reduce the friction without giving up minimal required controls (like enforcement of contracts). Now where I disagree with Conservatives and Progressives is that government can be an improver of men. Government can keep criminals off the streets (I should add has been traditionally empowered to) and create an environment conducive to honest dealings (contract/business law). But government can not bring into being the New Socialist Man, The New Libertarian Man, The New Conservative Man, The New Christian Man, etc. Why? Because the ideal can't exist. Why you ask? Well it is a principle supposedly enshrined in Conservative thought. Self interest. And you know this may come as a surprise - my estimation of my self interest may not coincide with your estimation of my self interest. This may be for various reasons. One could be you are right and I am wrong. OTOH I could be right and you wrong. The principle of maximum liberty dictates that if you are not scaring the horses in the street or stealing then the very maximum deference should be given to the person closet to the "problem". The self whose self interest is in question. Evidently this used to be called the night watchman theory of government. I think that was in the era of Peace Officers. Before the era of Enforcers. The founder of a certain religion was against using law for moral uplift. You have to wonder how so many who claim to be followers can square that circle? About all you can say is that humans is very interesting creatures. I aspire to be one some day. Well maybe not. I try to treat people in a way they prefer (individually) to be treated. An idea that seems to be rather unfashionable these days. Every body (well almost) has an agenda for the other guy. I don't see how they can do it. I can barely manage my own agenda. I can do without busy bodies and the "it is all so unfair" folks adding to my load. I am certainly not interested in moral uplift at the point of a gun. Eric has more on the subject here. Cross Posted at Power and Control posted by Simon on 08.05.10 at 06:58 AM
Comments
I served on engineering faculties for 37 years. It is true that engineering professors are more conservative than humanities professors only because there are few Marxists on engineering faculties, whereas nearly all humanities faculty are Marxists. However, engineering professors are by and large on the left/liberal side of the ideogical scale. This has been shown by surveys of presidential voting preferences. Engineering professors vote Democratic. The only exceptions are Civil Engineering and Agricultural Engineering, but even there the Republican tendency is not dominant. Newer engineering faculty are even more skewed to the left/liberal side than are older ones. That said, engineering students are generally moderately conservative, although I ran into many liberal students during my career. It is also true that humanities students tend to be somewhat more conservative than their teachers, Marxists all. bob sykes · August 5, 2010 08:57 AM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
August 2010
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
August 2010
July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
beware of marginalized outsiders who don't give a damn!
My Experience Is Similar I try to be what I am. But what should I say I am that I haven't already said? Winning by running against litmus tests Global Warming Enhances Erectile Function Is there anything those awful homos won't do? The Veneer Of Civilization Who is sharing your child's "publicly available information"? And with whom? Two words too good to miss For Those Who Like Out-of-Control Big Government -- A Shining Example of Statist Spending!
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Conservatives and Progressives insist that government can be an improver of men.
Sad but true, the entire issue expressed in ten words. Beginning today, I'm using that line in every argument.
'M. and Eric say----'