|
May 19, 2010
Voluntary compliance is for your own good!
To my consternation, I just learned via an email from a friend that incoming students at UC Berkeley are being asked to provide DNA samples. Voluntarily, of course: Instead of the usual required summer-reading book, this year's incoming freshmen at the University of California, Berkeley, will get something quite different: a cotton swab on which they can, if they choose, send in a DNA sample.OK, it's voluntary, right? And even though this is a government-run University, no one is being forced, which means no libertarian should care, right? That's easy enough for a 55-year old libertarian to say. But thinking back to when I was eighteen, I didn't have access to the kind of 20/20 hindsight I have now, and I might have thought "How cool! Now I get to know all about my genetic health risks!" As to invasion of privacy, banish the thought! This is all confidential, and no one will be able to find out which student's information pertains to whose. Except the stated purpose of this project is to soften the students up for what's coming: The testing will be voluntary and confidential, with no one at Berkeley knowing which sample comes from which student.To which I would add that the whole idea of sharing medical results outside a medical setting is troubling. Once your DNA is in your medical records -- and especially once the medical records can be accessed by government bureaucrats at will under PelosiCare -- the busybody mischief by Berkeley professors will look like child's play. All of our DNA will become subject to investigation via computerized database search engines, whether at the behest of law enforcement looking for suspects, government-run healthcare providers who want to butt into our lives in order to "help" us, or of course our friends at the IRS. The implications are Orwellian, and I worry that the kids are being softened up when they're too young to fully understand and think things through. Moreover, this fits into a disturbing pattern of policy implementation I have noticed over the years. First, people are asked to do something "voluntarily" (like, for example, cutting off your dog's nuts or switching over to the "right" lightbulbs). Once people become accustomed to doing such things voluntarily, they quite naturally become unsympathetic to those recalcitrant few who don't. And the good citizens will then be quite willing to support new laws, with criminal penalties for not doing what every good citizen should. posted by Eric on 05.19.10 at 10:51 AM
Comments
And the good citizens will then be quite willing to support new laws, with criminal penalties for not doing what every good citizen should. Like Seat belt Laws Can anyone think of more???? Tom · May 19, 2010 01:04 PM I think the logical response is to demand the data be sent to students via email, then wiped from the admin's servers. TallDave · May 19, 2010 05:10 PM Meanwhile, here's our Regulatory Czar, Cass Sunstein abusing the term "voluntary" in a 2001 radio interview on the subject that's now know as the "Fairness Doctrine". Text: "Sites of one point of view agree to provide links to other sites, so that if you're reading a conservative magazine, they would provide a link to a liberal site and vice versa, just to make it easy for people to get access to competing views. Or maybe a pop-up on your screen that would show an advertisement or maybe even a quick argument for a competing view. [break] The best would be for this to be done voluntarily, but the word "voluntary" is a little complicated, and sometimes people don't do what's best for our society unless Congress holds hearings or unless the public demands it. And the idea would be to have a legal mandate as the last resort, and to make sure it's as neutral as possible if we have to get there, but to have that as, you know, an ultimate weapon designed to encourage people to do better." Listen to the whole sorry thing here: http://althouse.blogspot.com/2010/05/word-voluntary-is-little-complicated.html crawdad · May 19, 2010 10:33 PM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
May 2010
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
May 2010
April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Matt Barber and Andrew Sullvan care deeply about your sexual desires!
Examining The Drug War Spain's Green Jobs Program A Disaster More minimalist Puppy Love A Scientist In Congress? What About My Profits? Everybody Draw Muhammed Day Voluntary compliance is for your own good! Some accidental shootings are just the breaks! Running better, on next to nothing!
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Last year's summer project for students here at U.C. Berkeley was reading 'The Omnivore's Dilemma,' a book about farming and food processing practices in the U.S. Frankly, I liked the book. This year, there is no recommended summer book, just collecting student D.N.A. samples. I think reading a book was a better idea.