protecting the public at gunpoint -- from unregistered beer brands!

Nick Gillespie's post about the Pennsylvania crackdown on unlicensed allegedly "unregistered" beers makes me glad I left the state:

More than a dozen armed State Police officers conducted simultaneous raids last week on three popular Philadelphia bars known for their wide beer selections. The cops confiscated hundreds of bottles of expensive ales and lagers, now in State Police custody at an undisclosed location.

The alleged offense: Although the bar owners had bought the beer legally from licensed Pennsylvania distributors and had paid all the necessary taxes, the police claimed that nobody had registered the precise names of the beers with the state Liquor Control Board - a process that requires the brewers or their importers to pay a $75 registration fee for each product they want to sell in Pennsylvania.

Based on a complaint from someone the State Police refuse to identify, three teams of officers converged last Thursday on the three bars, run by Leigh Maida and her husband, Brendan Hartranft. Checking their inventories against the state's official list of more than 2,800 brands, the cops seized four kegs and 317 bottles, totaling 60.9 gallons of beer, according to police calculations.

In fact, according to Maida, more than half the beer removed by the State Police was properly registered - but the cops couldn't find it on their lists because of "clerical errors" or "blatant ineptitude" between the police and the Liquor Control Board, with whom the officers were conferring by telephone.

Well, hey, I guess we should be glad they didn't send in a SWAT team.

Pennsylvania, readers may remember, is a place where you can't buy a sixpack of beer in a convenience store, but instead have to buy it by the case at specially licensed "beer distributors" which are only open during certain hours. The latter, of course, now constitute a well-funded lobby that fights to keep their monopoly.

The unregistered beer brand bust is so typical of the way government works. Petty tyrants like the Liquor Control Board bureaucrats love nothing more than playing Eliot Ness reenactment games at the taxpayers' expense.

Why ordinary people put up with it is one of the mysteries of life.

MORE: It seems that whether ordinary people want to put up with it or not, they have very little to do with it. As former Pennsylvania Governor Dick Thornbugh explains, attempts at reform are blocked by an odd coalition:

"In my view, the principal roadblock to reform has traditionally been an odd coalition of state store employee unions, fundamentalist anti-alcohol groups and organizations such as Mothers Against Drunk Driving, all of which perceive that they have legitimate interests which are not susceptible to statewide budgetary considerations," Thornburgh said.

"It would take some courageous leadership to stare down this combination, something I do not see in the Commonwealth today," he added.

Applied to politics, "courageous leadership" sounds like an oxymoron.

posted by Eric on 03.09.10 at 04:30 PM





TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://classicalvalues.com/cgi-bin/pings.cgi/9451






Comments

Have you heard about Montgomery County (Maryland) Liquor Stores? Several states have state liquor store, but only Maryland has this absurdity. Liquor is sold in the normal way everywhere in Maryland, except in Montgomery County, where it is only sold in county-owned stores. Montgomery County is an affluent county bordering D.C.

chocolatier   ·  March 9, 2010 06:53 PM

Many states have all sorts of screwy regulations about alcohol. In Virginia, you can buy beer and wine in the grocery store, but any hard liquor must be bought at an "ABC" Store (ABC=Alcoholic Beverage Commission). When I lived in New York, I couldn't believe that I couldn't buy wine in the grocery store and I had to go to a liquor store whenever I wanted to get wine. Now I live in Nevada, where you can buy beer, wine, and hard liquor at the grocery, or the drugstore, or various other businesses.

Kurt   ·  March 10, 2010 12:04 PM

The irony is that because of these ridiculous "beer distributor" rules, it was actually harder for me to buy beer than hard liquor when I lived in PA!

Eric Scheie   ·  March 10, 2010 04:10 PM

In Texas liquor sales are by county option, actually by precinct, selected by elections. The options were "dry" (no sales), "beer only", "wine and beer", and "hard liquor" (the latter including wine and beer). When I was young, all of those were bottle sales only; "liquor by the drink" wasn't legal at all until the Eighties.

The county I grew up in was "dry", but an adjacent county had "hard liquor" sales. One year we had an "option" election, and I well recall all the preachers and deacons of the churches fanning out across the county urging votes against the Demon Rum -- followed closely by the bootleggers, who handed out two- or four-ounce bottles (usually of Four Roses bourbon) along with the suggestion to vote against Corrupting the Children. The measure failed, of course.

The county I live in now is "beer only", a fairly rare option -- but not all that rare, since the liquor manufacturers find it practical and profitable to make beer-based versions of the "coolers" normally made from wine.

Laws rarely make sense when money or some version of morality are involved. When both apply, any chance of rationality is discarded before consideration begins.

Regards,
Ric

Ric Locke   ·  March 10, 2010 11:50 PM

Post a comment

You may use basic HTML for formatting.





Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)


March 2010
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      

ANCIENT (AND MODERN)
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR


Search the Site


E-mail



Classics To Go

Classical Values PDA Link



Archives



Recent Entries



Links



Site Credits