I missed this video when it first came out. It is reporter Phelim McAleer asking Stephen Schneider some questions. Check out the totalitarian response to an inconvenient question.
And just who is Stephen Schneider? He is the academic who said:
"To do that we need to get some broad based support, to capture the public's imagination. That, of course, entails getting loads of media coverage. So we have to offer up scary scenarios, make simplified, dramatic statements, and make little mention of any doubts we might have. This "double ethical bind" we frequently find ourselves in cannot be solved by any formula. Each of us has to decide what the right balance is between being effective and being honest. I hope that means being both."
Ah. So honesty is no longer the best policy. Nice to know where he stands. If he is talking he is lying. Unless conclusively beyond a reasonable doubt proved otherwise.
Evidently the contact has been a bit too much for him.
Schneider is also a member of the Club Of Rome. Here is a bit on The Club of Rome along with a cast of characters.
"We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now much more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries."
David Rockefeller
Well on to the video.
And these folks wonder why there is a Tea Party movement? It seems like a rational response to their plan for world domination.
Click on the above image and learn how to spread it around.
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://classicalvalues.com/cgi-bin/pings.cgi/9440
Comments
"Each of us has to decide what the right balance is between being effective and being honest."
It is this kind of routine fraud masquerading as crusading principle that has long led me to note that most leftists simply don't have the character to conduct themselves, let alone govern others.
I don't care how many degrees their friends have awarded them.
The solution? Remove the intelligentsia from the public trough. They have no inalienable right to live off the people, and their ongoing abuse of the privilege should no longer be rewarded.
The Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler
Don?t bang your head!
"Each of us has to decide what the right balance is between being effective and being honest."
It is this kind of routine fraud masquerading as crusading principle that has long led me to note that most leftists simply don't have the character to conduct themselves, let alone govern others.
I don't care how many degrees their friends have awarded them.
The solution? Remove the intelligentsia from the public trough. They have no inalienable right to live off the people, and their ongoing abuse of the privilege should no longer be rewarded.