|
February 05, 2010
WARNING: Don't get hit by Big Government SUVs!
Because I know that Jim Treacher is a humorist, I thought that this early, one paragraph report of him being hit by a State Department vehicle might have been intended as some sort of satire. I'm sorry to see (via Glenn Reynolds' later link) that I was mistaken, and that this was actually a very serious accident, compounded by very scary behavior on the part of government officials: The State Department has refused to answer basic questions about an accident that took place in Washington on Wednesday night, in which a U.S. Diplomatic Security Service vehicle struck Daily Caller employee Sean Medlock as he was crossing the street.Jim Treacher is a longtime favorite blogger, who has graced this blog with witty and humorous comments over the years. I'm very sorry that this has happened to him, and what I don't like is that there is every indication of callused, heavy-handed, big government arrogance. First the cops tried to make it look as if Treacher was jaywalking. But then later, the guy in the SUV gave a different story: Curiously, the ticket says that Medlock was struck at an intersection four blocks from where the accident actually took place. And it claims that Medlock was walking diagonally across the intersection at the time. In one of his strikingly short conversations with the Daily Caller, agent Mike McGuinn acknowledged that Medlock was not jaywalking at all, but walking "outside the crosswalk when the incident occurred."Naturally, this raises questions. And they are being met with evasion and indifference: The question is: Did the federal agent driving the SUV, faced with potential liabilities from the accident, encourage local police to issue some sort - any sort - of citation to Medlock, to establish his culpability?And if you think that's bad, get a load of this. They're also trying to say that it was Treacher who attacked their SUV!: A second DSS spokeswoman, Sarah Rosetti, requested that questions be submitted in writing. When she responded in an e-mail, Rosetti claimed that "a jogger collided with one of the U.S. Department of State, Diplomatic Security Service's official vehicles" - as if Medlock, who does not jog, had somehow attacked the SUV.Grrrrr... One of the things that has long galled me is the way wrongdoers will frequently refuse to acknowledge that they did wrong (and instead go on the offensive), when a simple apology at the right time would have sufficed. This can lead to protracted litigation; I remember a case I worked on in which a client's car (an older VW bug) had been broadsided by a driver who ran a red light. All he had wanted was a simple acknowledgment that the other driver was in the wrong, and he wanted to get his car fixed. But the insurance company wouldn't admit liability and refused to pay for the damages, maintaining that the car was basically worthless because of its age. So the guy was pissed, and went the full, all-out litigation route. He ended up getting $15,000 or something, and I'm sure the insurance company spent a lot more than that on their attorneys, expert witnesses. But that's nothing compared to some of the insurance bad faith cases I remember. (There was one in which millions of dollars in punitive damages were awarded because an insurance company tried to avoid paying out a modest settlement in a simple fender bender.) Here it's the government, and not an insurance company, but I don't think the government should be allowed to behave in a manner that an insurance company would not be allowed to behave. (But so far, it appears that's just what the government is doing.) For more, see Matt Welch's "How Does the D.C. Establishment Compensate You for Smashing Your Leg with a Diplomatic SUV? By Giving You a Jaywalking Ticket for a Faraway Intersection, Then Accusing You of "Jogging" Into the Vehicle." Asks Welch about the above report, how many dumb government lies are packed into those six paragraphs?I don't know, but I'd be willing to bet that if I got into a detailed dissection, I would find not only lies, but lies within lies, etc. All I know is that if a California insurance company acted this way, Jim Treacher could very well end up owning the company. It's just too bad that Treacher can't end up owning the federal government. (But then maybe I shouldn't wish such a fate on poor Treacher....) MORE: Frank J. offers his analysis: despite him crossing at the crosswalk while the light was telling him to cross, they gave him a ticket for jaywalking. So it's like, "Sorry we ran you over and broke your knee, but pay us this fine." Except without the "sorry" part. MORE: It is being pointed out by commenters that this is a joke. If so, then I was right before I was wrong. But the ever-reliable Media Matters is taking this oh-so-seriously, and Eric Boehlert is fit to be tied. He claims initial reports of a hit-and-run were wrong, and demands retractions. So why isn't he saying the whole thing is a joke when he clearly has the opportunity? UPDATE: Glenn Reynolds links the most recent post from Jim Treacher, which ought to clear up any lingering questions about whether this was a joke. It was not. So now I'm in the hospital, and in a few hours they're going to try to fix my knee. It is my considered opinion that my knee never should have been damaged in the first place.I wish Jim the best. (And I hope he is able to sue for bad faith so he ends up owning the United States government!) posted by Eric on 02.05.10 at 12:11 PM
Comments
I've made a tour of our betters' opinions on this, because I'm stupid. The view from above: Thinking that Treacher's description of the accident is probably more accurate than the police and State's internally inconsistent non-explanation(s) is a "conspiracy theory," but knowing that his first thought after diving in front of a truck he thought was Secret Service, and failing to die by Obama's hand (for the revolution!), was how to turn his failed suicide-Reichstag plot into publicity for Carlson's website, isn't. Also, he's a racist. Of course. guy on internet (no relation) · February 5, 2010 01:02 PM Well, if it turns out to be a joke, at least I will have been right before I was wrong. Eric Scheie · February 5, 2010 02:05 PM I've seen no indication in the reporting that it's a joke. There's no "Newsish" or "Satire" tag or anything. Next up, the accusations that the wingnuts are saying they ran him down because the gov't is after right-bloggers. I figure he joined Greenpeace and started running down SUVs without really thinking it through. Veeshir · February 5, 2010 02:39 PM Veeshir, you reminded me that I forgot to put satire tags on "ever-reliable" in reference to Media Matters! Eric Scheie · February 5, 2010 03:26 PM From personal experience, I can tell you that when you are hit by a car doing 20mph or so, you may fly through the air - in my case almost 30 feet. How many crosswalks are you aware of that are that wide? Even if they cited him at the right intersection, unless they had an independent witness statement (still notoriously unreliable), they appear to have missed this salient fact. I don't know if Rahm was right about Democrats, but certainly this little part of the State Department is f'n retarded. chuckR · February 5, 2010 08:22 PM I read an article once on how Toro changed in the 90s to start issuing apologies to people who were hurt using their mowers, and their average settlement dropped dramatically. Someone at some point wised up and realized they were still losing cases anyway, and that apologizing up front and making an offer cost them less. Even if it was due to user error, it was cheaper to not bother investigating. This is one of those areas where "a corporation is not a person" seems to come up. I don't subscribe to the idea corporate entities should not have rights, but on the other hand, it's easy to act like a jerk if you are not responsible to pay up. plutosdad · February 9, 2010 11:02 AM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
February 2010
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
February 2010
January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Thankless tasks drive people to drink
Looking At Light "the Pol Pot of noodledom" Tea Party Fraud If only class war had remained a Marxist meme No Mystery Song Saturday night mystery song First Demoralize Much as I hate to ignore politics.... Liberty, Health Care, and WalMart
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Wait, are you sure this isn't a joke?
I thought Reynolds and friends were just riffing on Treacher's story.