|
December 09, 2009
Power beyond Nixon's dreams
The Washington Examiner looks at the EPA's so-called "Endangerment Ruling" and concludes that "Obama has launched a thermonuclear warhead aimed directly at the very heart of congressional authority": The EPA Endangerment Ruling assigns to the agency authority under the Clean Air Act to regulate emissions not included under that law's purview. Indeed, when the original law was approved by Congress, nobody said a word about any agency of the federal government telling any business or industry in America how much CO2 it could emit. By now saying the law gives it unilateral authority to declare CO2 dangerous pollutants, the EPA is grabbing power to regulate the 85 percent of the U.S. economy that depends on energy derived from the burning of carbon-based fuels. Those fuels -- oil, natural gas, and coal -- are heavy CO2 emitters. This ruling thus renders congressional intent irrelevant. If the ruling stands, the law will then be whatever the president and his bureaucratic minions in the executive branch decree, not what the people decide acting through their elected representatives in Congress.NRO calls the result an "EPA run economy." (And you thought the Federal Reserve was bad....) I don't expect this Congress to stand up for its rights, but I guess there's still the Supreme Court. The problem is that in 2007 the Supreme Court ruled that the EPA itself violated the Clean Air Act by not regulating CO2: In April 2007 the Supreme Court ruled in Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency, 549 U.S. 497 (2007) that the EPA violated the Clean Air act by not regulating greenhouse gas emissions.[1] In the ruling the Court said that the EPA Administrator must determine whether or not there was sufficient scientific evidence to support the supposition "that emissions of greenhouse gases from new motor vehicles cause or contribute to air pollution which may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare... The Supreme Court decision resulted from a petition for rulemaking under section 202(a) filed by more than a dozen environmental, renewable energy, and other organizations."[2] Section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act is titled "Emission standards for new motor vehicles or new motor vehicle engines" [3]So I don't expect much help from the Court. At the Emperor can't stop people from voting. Or having opinions. MORE: I guess there is sort of a resemblance, isn't there? And let me make one thing perfectly clear. The EPA itself was created by Richard Nixon. MORE: David Harsanyi looks at the EPA Endangerment Ruling, and says "What we need is a RICO trial." It looks like vintage Nixonian nostalgia is in. MORE: Commenter Phelps says "I'm a trendsetter!" and looking at his photo comparison, I'm inclined to agree. posted by Eric on 12.09.09 at 11:57 AM
Comments
Phelps · December 9, 2009 06:11 PM Next step - regulating what we eat. That shouldn't be too hard for the Health Department. Etznsotnp (the last eight letters are silent) · December 15, 2009 02:44 AM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
December 2009
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
December 2009
November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
An idea whose time has cum?
Fewer people means fewer emissions! "Copendeniers" at the gate! The AP Investigates ClimateGate Fraud for a worthy cause? Sarah Palin Reads Poetry Communist Physics Does the Constitution limit Congress? At all? God Bless America Is being right more important than winning?
Links
Site Credits
|
|
I p-shopped that pic of Obama onto this Mussolini pic. http://www.theatheistconservative.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/mussolini.jpg
It seemed fitting.
It certainly fit once I mirrored it.