|
|
|
|
June 25, 2009
When in Rome, visit the ruins while attending the games!
Speaking of my cultural illiteracy, I'm embarrassed to admit that until last night I had never heard of the Hygienic Dress League. However, I had my camera handy, and I took a picture:
As it turns out, the "League" is all in the minds of the sign painters, who happen to be engaged in guerilla art: The culprits responsible are Detroit artists Dorota Bilica and Steve Coy, who created the "League" back at the University of Hawaii as a way to have fun mocking ad images -- and more recently, to perk up desolate Detroit buildings.As someone who loves classical architecture, I'm more worried about the fate of the building. If the Hygienic Dress League can help save it, I'm all for it. Just don't expect me to wear a hygienic dress. Here's the top of a nearby skyscraper which (fortunately) looks as if it may still be in use:
Detroit is loaded with incredibly cool buildings in a poor state of repair. Where the money will come from to repair them, who knows? To call the city economically depressed is understatement, and modern building codes often require things like environmentally friendly double pane windows. And asbestos removal. (Another pet peeve, because the danger of asbestos -- especially chrysotile asbestos -- is highly exaggerated by the asbestos trial lawyer industry.) Ironically, because expensive asbestos removal is required in order to demolish a building, the asbestos might be prolonging the life of these beauties. So perhaps asbestos can be seen as being an unwitting best friend of the preservationists -- a hygienic form of dress for older buildings. Why not? Is there some rule that destruction must always be the handmaiden of progress? Couldn't the modern forces of Henry VIII have destroyed "Papism" without knocking down almost every last Norman monastery in England? There I go, getting distracted to the point that I almost lost track of this post, which was not so much the Hygienic Dress League, my cultural illiteracy, or even old buildings. These were merely sights I saw along the road to last night's main event, which was a baseball game: the Detroit Tigers versus the Chicago Cubs. I rooted for the Tigers, because I live here, and if for no other reason supporting the local team is a "when in Rome" kind of thing. Here's Tiger hunger at the gates:
A few pictures of the game. It was tough to catch the ball in action, but in this photo I caught the ball being bunted by a Cub:
And a missed bunt by a Tiger:
Here are two taken right after the ball was hit:
I noticed that although I was lucky enough to catch the action, the camera seems to distort the "narrative" (if you will) -- for the participants have not yet had time to react to what they just did. Towards the climax of the game, a nearby fireworks show provided a fairly sizable distraction, with lots of noise, and sights like this:
The Tigers won 5-3, and people exited as the fireworks did its thing with the grand finale. I took this while walking down the exit ramp:
MORE: I almost forgot about an important cultural icon which graces the road to Detroit:
It's the giant Uniroyal Tire, originally made for the 1964 World's Fair, and kept in a good state of repair ever since: The Uniroyal® Giant Tire was originally created as a Ferris wheel attraction at the 1964/1965 New York World's Fair. The wheel held 96 fairgoers and was powered by a 100-horsepower motor. More than two million people rode the Giant Tire Ferris wheel during the fair, including Jacqueline Kennedy and her children, John Jr. and Caroline. posted by Eric on 06.25.09 at 01:00 PM
Comments
The art versus vandalism issue fascinates me, and I posted about it here: http://www.classicalvalues.com/archives/2005/07/hate_of_art.html No way should someone's unsolicited art legally limit the owner's rights. If people like it that much, they ought to buy it. The building in question, though, is owned by the city, and if the artists have slowed down the demolition process, it's fine with me. Eric Scheie · June 25, 2009 04:43 PM Hey, have you seen this news article? Michael · June 26, 2009 12:42 AM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
June 2009
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
June 2009
May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Preventable tragedy?
Soccer Moms Going To Pot When in Rome, visit the ruins while attending the games! A conspiracy of cultural illiteracy Black And Green Saudi Underwear Revolution Reports From Iran Regime Change Iran Logo Banned It's high time we headed in the wrong direction? A single DDOS can ruin a mullah's entire day!
Links
Site Credits
|
|
"Guerilla Art" - we used to call that vandalism or grafitti (that I like this particular instance is neither here nor there).
There is also the danger to the land owner (if they care) that they cannot destroy the art installation without the artists consent, if the original installation was done with their consent. Something about copyright law. Famous case about a lobby in a building in Queens.
As to Detroit - look at Natchez, MS. Grinding poverty after the Civil War/War of Northern Agression (take your pick) meant that all those wonderful victorian homes were not torn down and can now be restored.