|
June 30, 2009
Fareed Zakaria (whose Future of Freedom is a must read) has this to say about the possibility of revolution in Iran: It's possible but unlikely. While the regime's legitimacy has cracked -- a fatal wound in the long run -- for now it will probably be able to use its guns and money to consolidate power. I don't know why anyone thinks they need money. Regimes from Cuba to Burma to Cambodia to North Korea stay comfortably esconced with only the power that flows from the cracked barrel of a rusty gun, proving again what can be observed since the dawn of human history: leaders need neither legitimacy nor coin to quell internal uprisings, they need only force of arms and the will to use them. Soon after the revolution, Iraq attacked Iran, and the mullahs again wrapped themselves in the flag. The United States supported Iraq in that war, ignoring Saddam Hussein's use of chemical weapons against Iranians -- something Iranians have never forgotten. You know what's odd? Every time I hear this assertion, propagated by the mullah tyrants and treated as gospel by American leftists, that Iranians are holding a grudge over American "support" for the Hussein regime during the Iran-Iraq war -- which support amounted to a handshake and a smile, during a period when Iraq was the world's largest importer of arms -- I never hear any mention of the possibility they might be grateful we spent much more time and effort containing and ultimately removing Saddam. Shouldn't this net out to a giant positive in their attitude toward the U.S.? And wouldn't it make more sense for them to resent the French, Germans, and Russians who were arming Iraq (at considerable profit) and who opposed Saddam's removal? The situation under Saddam is a bigger deal than many people realize. For decades, Iranians were cut off from Najaf. Since Saddam's fall, millions of them visit Iraq on holy pilgrimage every year -- where they now see real democracy, which is probably a large part of why they're now taking to the streets and demanding their own. But while we'd all like to see the mullahs overthrown and a liberal democracy in Persia, the truth is there's very little chance of that happening as long as the regime believes it has the moral right to brutally suppress dissent -- and with the current U.S. administration's avowed strategy of enabling and apologizing, there's little chance of that changing. posted by Dave on 06.30.09 at 11:15 PM
Comments
We supported Iraq? Wasn't Ronnie Rayg.... errr.... Ollie Nor...errrr.. somebody, I forget who, selling weapons to the Iranians? Veeshir · July 1, 2009 09:52 AM Conventional wisdom seems to hold that the French, Germans and Russians were sending Saddam humanitarian aid, while we (unspeakable horrors that we are) were sending him nail bombs, poison gases, the addresses of the hiding places of all of the Iranian mullahs, oil-tankers full of small arms, oodles of big arms, and math teachers. And if you try to point out the disparity about the weapons we didn't send, you just get laughed at. bobby b · July 1, 2009 01:44 PM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
July 2009
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
July 2009
June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Thank you for ignoring my heresy
Your candidate's adultery is worse than mine! Whose favorite villains are to blame for the latest horror? Hating Sarah Palin is so gay! That Should Work If there's one thing worse than a GOP sex scandal, it's a Southern GOP sex scandal! Overdosed on absolute relativism No silence here! Neda Net
Links
Site Credits
|
|
The only move that could wind up changing the regime is a national strike. I don't think the unions are up for that.
I don't say that accusing them of being cowards. It's an almost impossible situation for them to be in. If, on the other hand, everyone was armed....