|
March 10, 2009
The Obama Two Step?
While there's no way to ascertain for sure whether Barack Obama's disastrous economic policies are malevolent or incompetent, I found it interesting that yesterday he went out of his way to deny being a socialist (by pleading that he thought it was all a joke): "It was hard for me to believe that you were entirely serious about that socialist question," he told reporters, who had interviewed the president aboard Air Force One on Friday.Blame the Republicans? For socialism? If that isn't the final insult, I don't know what is. To add to my puzzlement, today I see a piece from Clive Crook, titled "Why Obama's left leaning is no tactical feint": On this page last week I argued that Barack Obama's first budget showed him to be more of a left-leaning liberal than I and many others - sceptics and admirers alike - had previously supposed. People I respect have accused me of going off the deep end about this, or of neglecting Mr Obama's tactical finesse, or both.Well, if he is playing a "shrewder game," he hides it well. However, regardless of whether any of this is deliberate or incompetent, one thing is certain: Barack Obama is a shrewd enough politician to know how to use whatever mess results to his political advantage. And if he can position himself to the "right" of the "socialist" Republicans, it will have the effect of making his conservative critics look ridiculous. What the latter ought to worry about is that if he really did manage to perform a policy shift to the right (along the lines of actual Reaganomics), it might just lift the economy out of the doldrums -- with Obama getting all the credit. So perhaps we'll see a new dance routine: A feint to the left, then a feint to the right. The neat thing about way the dance works, is that it really doesn't matter which way is malevolent and which way is incompetent, because each side considers the other to be both. (Besides, malevolence can be incompetent, just as incompetence can be malevolent!) posted by Eric on 03.10.09 at 11:19 AM
Comments
And if he can position himself to the "right" of the "socialist" Republicans, it will have the effect of making his conservative critics look ridiculous. If by "position" you mean "lie and lie and lie some more to try to spin away the biggest spending spree in the history of money as a continuation of Republican policies, calling them the socialists because of Bush", then I think you may have a point. Bush, with his NCLB and prescription drug crap, spent money on things the government should not be involved in, and ran what appear now to be minor-league deficits. For Obama to claim that Bush started it, therefore it is Republicans who are to blame, is typical Obama deceit. Loren Heal · March 10, 2009 12:38 PM I do not understand the number of commentators -- and reasonably intelligent people I know -- who are convinced a politician is being shrewd, or clever, or brilliant, simply by talking out of both sides of his or her mouth. Why is "brilliant" to claim to be conservative when implementing left/liberal policies? I always thought that was a sign of disingenuousness or, bluntly, lying, rather than an oversized brain. But I didn't go to Harvard or Columbia. Rhodium Heart · March 10, 2009 12:51 PM I believe that dance is called the Okie Doke Hokey Poke. Phelps · March 10, 2009 01:56 PM If Obama's right wing policies fail people will be clamoring for real socialism. M. Simon · March 10, 2009 06:44 PM If Obama objects to TARP and the prescription drug plan, as his remarks are intended to imply, why doesn't he ask Congress to repeal them? Bob Smith · March 10, 2009 07:24 PM If Obama objects to TARP and the prescription drug plan, as his remarks are intended to imply, why doesn't he ask Congress to repeal them? Bob Smith · March 10, 2009 07:25 PM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
March 2009
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
March 2009
February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Dalinian Republican prophesies?
(Some irrational illustrations) Remembering Madrid Assigning blame A Lack Of Trust The New Gospel Of Liberty I'm in bitches Watch me on PJTV! September 30, 1999 the airbrushing of the airbrushing The Obama Two Step?
Links
Site Credits
|
|
If it quacks like a duck...