|
March 31, 2009
Ending the cycles of preventative reaction
Via Glenn Reynolds (who sees a tipoff in the "candlelight vigils"), Rand Simberg skewers one of the most idiotic arguments I have yet heard against armed self defense. Anti-gun activists have found a convenient poster boy for their cause -- one John Woods, described as "a student at Virginia Tech when his girlfriend and several other people he knew there were gunned down." Woods says he thought about getting a gun, then rejected the idea, for reasons I find incomprehensible: There were times when Woods thought that maybe he should get a gun.If the "idea" that somebody could stop a school shooting with a gun is impossible, then what could possibly explain the fact that shootings stop when the gunman is finally shot? reactive, not preventative? Whatever can he mean? That it is wrong to react? Are the two mutually exclusive? Isn't it self-apparent that a reaction (say, shooting the shooter) can also be preventative? And is not what he would call "prevention" (in the form of gun control) also reactive in nature? Why isn't it "reactive" to fight against bills that would allow concealed carry? I'm having trouble understanding how this false dichotomy assists anyone's understanding in any way. Perhaps I'm being reactive, though. Were I more preventative, I'd go attend a candlelight vigil. posted by Eric on 03.31.09 at 11:12 AM
Comments
To be prepared for an incident is proactive, to do something is reactive. But to wait until some time after the incident then decide what you woulda/shoulda done is inane. hugh · March 31, 2009 11:37 AM "Woods ... said he hasn’t heard from any survivor of the Virginia Tech shooting who supports guns on campus." It's because everyone knows talking to you would be a waste of time, dude. Wayne · March 31, 2009 11:50 AM " I'm having trouble understanding how this false dichotomy assists anyone's understanding in any way."...Because you are trying to the logic in this percons argument. Unfortunately, there is no logic involved with the position this person has staked out. One wonders, accepting his position at face value, why he bothered hiding at all. Edward Lunny · March 31, 2009 02:36 PM What else should one expect from the ACC and the Big 12? dr kill · March 31, 2009 02:45 PM Mr. Woods argument is thus: "I suffered in a tragedy. I therefore am entitled to non sequiturs in perpetuity." See also anti-Bush 9-11 Families. Rhodium Heart · March 31, 2009 02:47 PM Obviously the kid didn't major in logic. No doubt he is a big fan of Obama. Bilwick1 · March 31, 2009 05:10 PM said Woods, who is now a graduate student at UT. stop stupidity close the universities! dre · March 31, 2009 07:01 PM There is no 2nd Amendment in Mexico. The Mexican are going to have to fight a civil war there soon to keep the drug gangs from taking over. Their government is corrupt and incapable of defending individual liberties. Because of Mexican gun laws, only the bad guys have the guns. Virginia Tech, Columbine, etc., are unfortunate consequences of living in a free society. Without the right to gun ownership, eventually - as in Mexico - the bad guys will wind up with all the guns and individuals won't have a chance. Take your pick. There really isn't any gray area here. MAS1916 · March 31, 2009 07:06 PM Mr. Woods is a coward. There were plenty of chances to pull out a gun if armed since Cho was going from floor to floor and room to room. The professor who blocked the door and shield with his body had an opportunity to attempt to defend. Any armed CCW holder could have shot Cho instead of lying down and pretending to be dead. Like any coward Mr. woods wants everyone else to be a coward so his cowardice does not show up. Anyway Jeanne Assam in Colorado showed what one armed person can do to a determined assailant. After she shot him he elected suicide rather than more homocide. Anonymous · March 31, 2009 08:16 PM Mr. Woods is a coward. There were plenty of chances to pull out a gun if armed since Cho was going from floor to floor and room to room. The professor who blocked the door and shield with his body had an opportunity to attempt to defend. Any armed CCW holder could have shot Cho instead of lying down and pretending to be dead. Like any coward Mr. woods wants everyone else to be a coward so his cowardice does not show up. Anyway Jeanne Assam in Colorado showed what one armed person can do to a determined assailant. After she shot him he elected suicide rather than more homocide. RAH · March 31, 2009 08:16 PM He's obviously forgotten Charles Whitman. Or never knew about him. Donna B. · April 1, 2009 12:45 AM |
|
May 2009
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
May 2009
April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
The Death Of Copyright
A racist liberal agenda that's kept in the closet Supplying humor for serious times? How to make crime disappear ITER Delayed, Scaled Back The Hookers Are Well Educated Climate Modelers At Work No ordinary reporter Are things getting to be unprecedented? light night flight
Links
Site Credits
|
|
This is what happens when you send marginal thinkers to university. They get to thinking that they have a clue.
You can no more prevent crime than you can prevent an earthquake. You can, at best, plan to minimize the damage and clean up after the inevitable.