|
February 24, 2009
Do I have to upgrade to the fix to the patch that's fixing to bug my fix?
I've never liked Adobe's "free" pdf reader, as it has hung my computer more times than any other single software glitch. Many times I've been frozen up and had to do a hard reboot simply because I've tried to open pdf files which failed. I've been scolded repeatedly for not "upgrading" to the "latest version" as I should ("latest" versions are an unending computer hassle, of course), but in light of the latest news, I'm beginning to think I should just try to do without pdf files entirely: A dangerous and unpatched vulnerability in Adobe's PDF-reading software has been around a lot longer than previously realized.Well, at least this time my Mac friends won't be able to smugly say "I TOLD YOU SO!" and brag about how they "no longer have to worry" about viruses. I have to marvel, though, over human ingenuity. That so many people would be so dedicated to annoying total strangers by discovering new ways of intruding into their lives never ceases to amaze me. But I guess things could be worse. At least these hackers aren't going out and getting government jobs.... posted by Eric on 02.24.09 at 09:36 AM
Comments
I affects both Mac and Windows users of Acrobat. But who uses Acrobat on a Mac*? OSX comes with PDF support built in. I only use Foxit for PDF viewing on my Windows machines. Acrobat Reader is the very devil, even if it was perfectly secure. (* Answer: People who have to deal with one of the tiny, tiny, tiny fraction of PDFs that only Acrobat Reader can cope with. And those poor bastards stuck using Acrobat (not Reader) to create PDFs.) Sigivald · February 24, 2009 02:59 PM "I only use Foxit for PDF viewing" Same here. Acrobat sucks. guy · February 24, 2009 03:12 PM People who have to deal with one of the tiny, tiny, tiny fraction of PDFs that only Acrobat Reader can cope with. That includes PDFs with forms, since Preview can't handle saved forms. For example, the IRS is a big user of such PDFs. Bob Smith · February 24, 2009 03:21 PM Try Foxit Reader for PDF files. It's tiny compared to Adobe, and doesn't have nearly as many problems. Somewhere around version 5 Adobe was a useful way to read pdfs, since then it's turned into a monster piece of bloatware with massive problems. After thelast "upgrade" I've completely deleted it, and good riddance. Man Mountain Molehill · February 24, 2009 05:32 PM Don't know about Windows, but Nisus and NeoOffice for the Mac have built in PDF distillers. A search on "pdf" on the Apple downloads page will find dozens of items dealing with PDFs. Alan Kellogg · February 24, 2009 08:51 PM Perhaps because I'm still using version 5 Acrobat, I'm still happy with it. Very seldom do I come across a file that is not readable, even though I get a warning that the file might contain information my version can't read. I never upgrade until I have to.
Donna B. · February 25, 2009 03:25 AM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
February 2009
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
February 2009
January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Happy Fat Tuesday!
TARP Funnies Do I have to upgrade to the fix to the patch that's fixing to bug my fix? Avoid Accidents - Smoke Pot Support your local dinosaur! And fight the asteroid threat! dodging snow and missing signs Missouri break Boston Globe - End Heroin Prohibition race is hell Music Is Going To Bits
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Mac guys, who get rather pissy about these things, might point out to you that this isn't a virus, by any definition, and that even if this hole were being exploited for delivery of Mac-specific malware, the bad guys' code wouldn't run.
"The bug affects both Mac and Windows users" is carefully, propagandistically worded. It's a stock phrase appended to these announcements to make Microsoft customers feel better. They are, after all, almost everybody. That the these kind of coding errors can't be turned against Mac users without their explicit cooperation is what's elided.
Really, the "no viruses" thing, however broadly understood, is the only part of Apple smugness that's justified. And they paid top dollar for it. Let 'em have it.