|
|
|
February 17, 2009
The War On Gangs
Yes. The War On Gangs is over in the US. The murder rate in the USA has been declining since 1991. We know that a real war on drug gangs (Mexico) causes an increase in dug violence. Even the FBI agrees with that point (a real drug war increases violence). So in reality drugs have been de facto decriminalized. Now why do I say THAT? Good question. I have a train of logic which I hope hasn't jumped the tracks. We no longer have a war on gangs. We have a war on some gang members. Destabilizing gangs is bad for public order. And of course the arrests for drug crimes are up. How else are you going to cover for such a massive shift in policy? I was a witness to one of the whole gang raids of the 80s (around 1988 IIRC). The big kahuna was a next door neighbor of mine. A really nice guy. We never had gang problems in the neighborhood until the DEA took him out. Any way. The FBI predicted a rise in the murder rate in our town due to taking the gang out. Let us just say that the spike in murders was not well received. My guess is that the DEA decided: a war on gangs or continuation of the gravy train. Ending the war on gangs of course ends the war on drugs as a real enterprise. You need organized crime to organize transnational shipments of illegal commodities. Not to mention making a market between people who would rather not know each other: growers and buyers - for commodities that are locally grown. So there you have it. The drug war is no longer about reducing the supplies of drugs or taking down the gangs that move them. It is now just a jobs program for government employees and preventing the worst violations of public order. Inspired by a post at the Volokh Conspiracy Cross Posted at Power and Control posted by Simon on 02.17.09 at 04:16 PM
Comments
Terry Prachett in his Disc World series has the Patrician do much the same with crime in the large city of Ankh-Morpork. There's an Assassins' Guild, a Thieves' Guild, a Prost...I mean ...Seamstresses' Guild, etc. The theory is each would establish rules of proper behavior for their dues paying members. And should a non-dues payer commit a crime within their jurisdiction it was up to the guild to mete out punishment. After all, if you're going to have crime, you might as well organize it. joated · February 17, 2009 08:29 PM So if President Obama stayed left on the "soft drug" stuff, and repositioned the "War On Drugs" to "I see you...but not looking at you exactly", would that help in reshaping your attitude about this new administration, Simon? Penny · February 18, 2009 02:41 AM That's a pretty convoluted way to note that some law enforcement has the honor to remain bought. Brett · February 18, 2009 07:27 AM Penny, Yeah. I'd cut him some slack. But his economic program is still a disaster area. But really. I'd like to see a politician with enough nerve to discuss the NIDA finding that addiction is 50% genetic. It seems to me that if that finding was made public the drug war could not stand. But Barry is not known for his political courage. M. Simon · February 18, 2009 11:10 AM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
February 2009
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
February 2009
January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
• Constellation Program
• The War On Gangs • I'm Here To Spread Panic • The Bo Diddley Beat • What Engineers Do • Beyond Expectations • China And Russia Hooking Up • Bigoted gay double standard • Leadership • The Wind Power Express
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Unfortunately, it is still going to punish casual drug users and people who are too poor to get charges dismissed. While this is better than an aggressive gang/drug war that causes more violence, it is still much worse than ending the whole farce completely and officially. But that would eliminate all those cushy jobs and we can't have that, can we?