|
November 20, 2008
"a priestly elite of cultural directors"
During the past year, everyone saw what happened when garbage loans on overvalued real estate were misrepresented and sold as triple-A-rated securities. The bubble eventually burst. But not quite as many people are aware that the bubble has also burst in the art world -- to the point where a series of the most important recent art auctions were dubbed "New York's 'half-price art sale'." The biggest loser? Contemporary art: It's post-mortem time for contemporary art, the highest flying area of the art market. After several years of unprecedented growth, which have seen prices at auction increase by an average 25 per cent each year since 2002, it experienced a definitive setback in New York last week.This does not surprise me. David Geffen must be especially delighted to have unloaded his Jackson Pollock dripping for $140 million in 2006. At the time I wasn't impressed. While I'm 100% in favor of freedom for people to buy whatever they like, I'm hardly in tears for the buyers of overpriced paintings with the aesthetic appeal of a spattered dropcloth, and I doubt very many people are. (Even if the banks which financed the sales had to take possession of the art to cover defaults, I don't think the buyers would be pitied in quite the same way we might feel sorry for a family which lost their house.) What is not being reported much is that some art still sells. That's because what sells is art that real people like, and not art that the critics say people should like. According to artist Robert Williams (a personal favorite whose art is selling like hotcakes), the bottom line is that: ...we're manipulated by a priestly elite of cultural directors in the art world, that's telling us what is and isn't art.It's fascinating to see how the market gets the last word. I mean, imagine for a moment a system where the people with the money to buy something get to decide what it is worth -- not based on what "experts" say, but based on whether they like it, and whether they are willing to buy it. I'm surprised the government doesn't intervene and put a stop to such rampant posted by Eric on 11.20.08 at 04:36 PM
Comments
Got it. Thanks! And thanks for stopping by, Connie! Eric Scheie · November 20, 2008 04:53 PM Not that I have the kind of money that would make my opinion matter, but art and other "collectibles" always struck me as the most risky and ill-advised things a person could put their money into. Companies make things, people need to live on or use land. These things have quantifiable value and an astute person can make an intelligent assessment of their worth. But art, baseball cards, barbie dolls, they have no value whatsoever except what someone who doesn't need them in any real sense will agree to pay for them. Anyone who buys art they don't want to look at for more money than the experience of looking at them is worth to them deserves to lose all their money. tim maguire · November 20, 2008 05:38 PM what sells is art that real people like, and not art that the critics say people should like. Fortunately(?) there's a lot of federal and private grant money available for producers of the latter. Heather · November 20, 2008 06:07 PM WHAT? CaptDMO · November 20, 2008 06:31 PM The only "art" I "own" is at the top of the page. dre · November 20, 2008 06:37 PM I'm surprised the government doesn't intervene and put a stop to such rampant freedom heresy. You probably believe you are being amusing and snarky, but it is my understanding that the Netherlands does precisely that. Their government, I am told, buys up artwork that would otherwise not sell in order to prevent artists from... well, getting real jobs, I suppose. Steve Skubinna · November 20, 2008 06:55 PM Хотя бы обратную ссылку ради приличия бы оставили, мол нашли там-то и там… Maimibiaseams · November 20, 2008 08:06 PM Big titties - yum. Note: baseball cards at a nickel a pop with gum seemed like a good deal to me back in the day. M. Simon · November 21, 2008 05:02 AM Sounds like some New York artists are in need of a bailout ... Whatever happened to the notion of art as a celebration of beauty? For the last generation, we were told that the most complimentary adjective that can be given a work of art is "shocking." Well, who wants to look at shocking everday in his living room, or office building lobby? Hell, who wants to spend vacation time looking at a wall of "shocking" at a gallery or museum? I always thought contemporary art was a frickin' joke being played on the pseudo-sophisticates who were being suckered into paying mega-bucks for crap (and, in some cases, literally feces). And all good scams must come to an end. Rhodium Heart · November 21, 2008 11:17 AM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
November 2008
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
November 2008
October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
A Servant's Heart
carrion scavenging too far... "a priestly elite of cultural directors" From closet to closet Right Wing Progressives Against The Nanny State What Is A Fetus Worth? The Jews And Partial Birth Abortion The Jewish Position On Abortion A few household sights
Links
Site Credits
|
|
You need a closing tag on your [ strike ].