|
November 28, 2008
Four prongs?
As the Mumbai attacks have made crystal clear, the situation in Pakistan sucks. Big Time. If you have the slightest doubt about this, Bridget Johnson details why in a must-read piece that Glenn Reynolds linked earlier: As the smoke clears and the body count grows in Mumbai, in one of the most brazen and chilling terrorist attacks we've seen in a long time, the truth about the region becomes crystal clear: Pakistan is a cancer on its neighbors. And the narrow focus of the attacks has also made it clear that Pakistan, allowing its extremists to operate unchecked, is also emerging as a greater threat to us.Barack Obama recognizes that the situation sucks, and while he didn't use such crude language, he nonetheless made it an integral part of his campaign. Oh, and by the way, the new sheriff sucks: Not implying, of course, in the traditional Western sense that this new sheriff has brought law and order. The ouster of Musharraf, which became a hot topic in our presidential campaign season, was supposed to enthrall lovers of democracy everywhere. But what has Asif Ali Zardari done since coming to power? Those are questions best answered by India and Afghanistan.Even if we were to put aside the attacks on Americans, Britons, and Jews (which no one in his right mind would do), this is a dire, dire situation. India and Pakistan have a long history of bitter enmity, and they are both nuclear powers. What bothers me the most about this is that I suspect a double pronged strategy: kill as many Americans and our allies as possible, and manipulate a historic grievance in the hope of jump-starting a war between India and Pakistan. Whether war between these two countries is inevitable or not, it should not be up to Al Qaeda to decide whether they go to war against each other. Hmmm... Actually, I should have called it a triple-pronged strategy, because the enemy is taking advantage of the fact that we have a new president, whom they regard with undisguised contempt (they were quick to insult him with the racial epithet), and they're probably hoping he's so green and weak that he won't stand up to them. The strategy is despicably brilliant, which is why (despite much speculation) I'm sure Al Qaeda is behind it. And what the hell, there might even be four prongs in their damned fork. With any luck, Pakistan will degenerate into complete chaos, and Al Qaeda's operatives will make off with one of their nukes. Again, despicably brilliant. posted by Eric on 11.28.08 at 10:53 AM
Comments
The estimable American Digest says, sensibly, that this sort of thing will continue until we adopt Hama Rules. Bleepless · November 28, 2008 06:17 PM India should attack Pakistan the moment it is sure Pakistan is involved in these attacks. Pakistan, being paranoid or aggressively self-pitying, will deem a retaliation from India as the gravest national security since partition, no matter how restrained that retaliation may be. This will likely cause Pakistan to escalate, perhaps with nuclear weapons. Therefor, India should seek to destroy all of Pakistan's nuclear attack capability with all means possible. Pakistan must be forced to end it's double-game and the imminent threat of the end of the country should either end that game or end Pakistan. I'd like the US to let the ICBMs fly if India stops short of ending Pakistan's first-strike nuclear capability. Keep pounding Pakistan until the locals put AQ Khan's head on a pike. Nuclear war with Islam is surely coming and the only question is will we let them take the first shot on their schedule. Scott M · November 29, 2008 03:24 AM The theory I like best is that elements of Pakistan's Intelligence Agency (ISI) planned and executed the attack to prevent radical elements of the agency from being purged. There is informed speculation about this at the Bridget Johnson piece linked in Eric's post above. M. Simon · November 29, 2008 08:28 AM If that is the case, and ISI elements are NOT purged, they'll be stronger than ever. (Which might mean that this could additionally be an indirect coup attempt.) As Johnson also notes, the LET group has longstanding ties to both the ISI and Al Qaeda. http://www.adl.org/terrorism/symbols/lashkaretaiba.asp The group was founded in the late 1980’s with the help of the Pakistani government (which also opposes the Indian presence in Kashmir) as the armed wing of the Markaz al-Dawa wa al-Irshad, an Islamic social welfare group. LET, which was also inspired by Osama bin Laden, continues to maintain close ties with Al Qaeda. Intelligence services have discovered that, before its camps were destroyed by the United States in 2001, Al Qaeda frequently hosted and trained LET operatives. Conversely, since the destruction of those camps, LET has hosted Al Qaeda trainees and other Islamic militants, including Shahzad Tanweer, one of the suicide bombers in the July 7, 2005 London Underground attack, according to British authorities. Additionally, senior Al Qaeda leaders, such as Abu Zubeida have been arrested at LET compounds.If they get their hands on a nuke, God help us. I'm happy that Obama offered in his campaign to go after the terrorists in Pakistan. It might make dealing with this easier. Eric Scheie · November 29, 2008 03:25 PM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
November 2008
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
November 2008
October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Drunken sex, and imbalanced power imbalances
A Mutiny At Cawnpore Archaeologists Find Old Pot The Immoral Nation Sex in the men's room -- it isn't just for gays anymore! (And drunken sex is mutual rape!) Four prongs? A Positronic Brain? Not So Long Ago Saving found art Yes, Happy Thanksgiving!
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Here's how I plan on responding to any leftie who complains about GWBush and the Republicans being warmongers. I am going to ask them, "Are you willing to do what is necessary to achieve world peace and an end to war?" If the answer is "no," then the criticism of Bush is foolish. But if the answer is "yes," then the response is, "We could achieve world peace right now without any bloodshed. You just need to convert to Islam and live by its extreme precepts."
Religion of my peace, my left nut.