|
July 01, 2008
Mamet Goes Conservative
This is kind of old news, but I need a post today. So here goes. I used to know David Mamet from his time helping to get the St. Nicholas Theater on Halsted Street in Chicago going. I was actually living in the theater at the time and helped them set up their sound system. I got to watch the play "American Buffalo" from the windows in our 2nd floor "apartment". I have heard rumors that I was the inspiration for the radio engineer in his play "The Water Engine". I knew Bill Macy rather well at the time. In any case, back in the day he and I were liberals. However, it looks like his outlook has changed. As has mine. David is discussing a play he wrote, "November", where the two main characters in it are a conservative and a liberal: The conservative president in the piece holds that people are each out to make a living, and the best way for government to facilitate that is to stay out of the way, as the inevitable abuses and failures of this system (free-market economics) are less than those of government intervention.Yes. We were all children of the 60s back then (1975). What changed my mind? I could see that liberalism (and its core socialism) didn't work. I'm not going to go into detail on all the events that shattered my illusions (the Vietnamese Boat People played a big part), but let me just say that my contact with the real world of business changed my mind about a lot of things. And, if you want to find out what changed Mamet's mind, read the whole thing. H/T Instapundit Cross Posted at Power and Control posted by Simon on 07.01.08 at 12:56 AM
Comments
I think the cliche really is true--if you're conservative at 20, you have no heart. If you are liberal at 40, you have no head. My favorite definition of a neo-conservative is a liberal who has concluded that liberals are a greater threat to liberal goals then are conservatives. Under that definition, I am a neo-conservative. I still have all the old liberal ideals, it's just become undeniable what a rediculous gang of idiots liberals are. Or, more directly, while I have no more use for conservatives than for liberals, I do have more respect for them. tim maguire · July 1, 2008 10:04 AM I hope Mamet has a good savings-account balance, 'cos his career as a writer is OVER. It's one thing to be a child-rapist like Polansky -- everyone makes a mistake now and then, and he probably thought she was at least sixteen -- but being a conservative is just unthinkable. Trimegistus · July 2, 2008 09:24 AM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
July 2008
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
July 2008
June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSALLAMERICANGOP See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
The gun nuts next door....
Doggies for demolition truth Worthless Dotcomradery sacred grounds and sacrilegious objections Local News Culture War is Religious War, claims Buchanan Gone are the days when my heart was young and... Think it can't happen here? Mamet Goes Conservative "Race is what defines us" (Especially if you dig holy dirt...)
Links
Site Credits
|
|
I hear you, brother. I was a theater major, graduating in 1975, and there were political and social beliefs that were considered just automatic then. The choices were socialist or communist. Even classical liberals of the Humphrey variety were considered dangerously reactionary, though McGovern and McCarthy still barely passed muster (because they were at least against the war, even if they were still part of the corrupt fascistic Amerikan system, doncha know).
The turnaround started for me in 1979 or so, as I began to realise that the prolife, or business-oriented, or evangelical Christian types were often genuinely nice people - nicer than the friends I had left at school, actually. They didn't actually hate poor people or black people and want to kick everyone else to the curb. That, uh, seemed to describe my lefty friends much better.
Even then it took ten years for me to become postliberal.