|
May 06, 2008
Prostitution is not racketeering!
While suicide is a very poor way of coping with federal racketeering charges, I have to say that I'm somewhat sympathetic to Deborah Jeane Palfrey, who left a suicide note explaining that she couldn't face spending 6-8 years in prison: "However, I cannot live the next 6-8 years behind bars for what both you and I have come to regard as this 'modern day lynching,' only to come out of prison in my late 50s a broken, penniless and very much alone woman," she wrote.(Link via Ann Althouse.) While we can debate the pros and cons of prostitution, it offends both common sense as well conventional jurisprudence to treat it as a major violent crime like armed robbery. But politicians need to get elected, so they keep passing more and more draconian laws, and the mischief-making RICO statute is a perfect example. Originally intended to go after the mob, the RICO laws have been used to go after poker games. Money laundering laws are another example. It defies common sense to suggest that ordinary drug users who buy drugs are "money launderers," any more than are customers of prostitutes. Yet as Eliot Spitzer and Rush Limbaugh learned, common sense has nothing to do with it. At the rate things are going, pretty soon hiring the wrong guy to cut your lawn could land you in the federal slammer. posted by Eric on 05.06.08 at 09:57 AM |
|
June 2008
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
June 2008
May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSALLAMERICANGOP See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
from backlash to baracklash
Gratuitous grammatical and stylistic advice for talking heads A sinful and tyrannical system Feel Free To Speak The invisible exception to the 4th Amendment? Wealth Without Money Contentedly contextualizing the contours of content History - The Prequel "serious doubts about his potency"? If you print this post, is it more logical?
Links
Site Credits
|
|
I also think that Ms. Palfrey was a half a tick off center. I think that the 6 to 8 years was used to scare her into confession, well, it half worked. She didn't even wait until after she was tried and convicted of these crimes. If it is true that she would have faced 6 to 8 years, this was her first offense, I doubt that she would have done even 6 years, her lawyer apparently didn't do his job where calming her fears comes into it, or was a pessimist.
It is a shame that she killed herself, now her story will never truly be told.