|
December 29, 2007
Up And Down
The Drug Czar says says that the current cocaine price spike shows progress in the War On Druggies. NPR reports on the story. For the past few months, the federal government has been celebrating the fact that U.S. cities are experiencing "an unprecedented cocaine shortage" due to increased law enforcement in the southwestern United States and Mexico.Great news for prohibitionists. They are finally starting to defeat the drug market. Something I said they would never do. I guess I'll have a big dish of crow. But wait. NPR did some fact checking. What did they find? But fact-checking by NPR reveals that while there are indeed spot shortages of cocaine, they are neither nationwide nor unprecedented. And the scarcity may have unintended consequences.I think we are going to need some details before we buy into some anecdotes by NPR. Walters said reports indicate that these interdictions have choked the cocaine supply in 37 cities across the country. The list included 15 major cities like Los Angeles, San Francisco, Minneapolis, Milwaukee and Grand Rapids, Mich., Walters said.The Drug Czar lying to us? How can that be? He is an honorable man and a public servant. I mean if you can't trust public servants what is he world coming to? A former budget control director in the Czar's office tells us. John Carnevale is a former budget director in the drug-control office who served under four former drug czars. He says the office had the Rand Corporation analyze long-term cocaine price trends.So we have a short term upward spike in a long term downward trend. Well the Drug Czar tells us that after examining the bodily fluids of hundreds of thousands of Americans he has proof of progress that can't be denied. Further proof of the cocaine shortage, Walters says, is that the nation's largest workplace drug-testing company has observed a 16 percent decline in positive cocaine drug tests during the first half of 2007.So drug users are switching from coke to meth and heroin. I'd call that real progress. For sure. The USA Today has noted another positive aspect of the crackdown. In Cleveland, police noted a contraction in drug markets in January. Homicides are up as local drug organizations vie for the shrinking cocaine supply, says Mayor Frank Jackson, who lauds a six-city, federally led task force for cracking down on local traffickers.Isn't that special. Fewer drugs more murders. I'm sure that city life has improved because of it. Mayor Jackson had some further comments on the effectiveness of the crack down. "Interdiction isn't the cure-all. The police cannot solve this problem. It's one leg on the stool."There is more than enough evidence that the stool is beginning to stink. It is well past flushing time. The unfortunate thing is that there is a lot of money supporting this stool. In other words the toilet is backed up and the overflow is making the whole house stink. Of course this is America and we are getting all the house we paid for. Cross Posted at Power and Control posted by Simon on 12.29.07 at 04:39 AM
Comments
I often point out that all the reasoning behind the drug war can equally be applied to alcohol. The inevitable, self-satisfied reply is that we tried that and it didn't work. After all, my interlocutor usually likes to take a drink; how dare anyone interfere with his individual liberty. How wise we were, he effervesces, to repeal that monster. I can't see that the experience of Prohibition taught us a damned thing. Brett · December 29, 2007 10:20 AM To say that a spike in drug prices is simply because of the great job our DEA and Border Patrol are doing is at best a real simplification. The two things can be related but this is a multi variable equation. Looking at it from only 2 variables (supply and demand) is not the full picture. ryan · December 30, 2007 02:36 AM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
January 2008
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
January 2008
December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSALLAMERICANGOP See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Is Huckabee simply the anti-Romney?
Callipyginous Ephebiphobia on the campaign trail? Policy Of Blockade HAPPY NEW YEAR! slanted or planted? Stifling diversity in the name of diversity? Insensitivity in the name of sensitivity? Fred's Message To Iowans A Marine Needs Help Recreating a past we only imagine
Links
Site Credits
|
|
The price of a commodity, independent of context, doesn't really tell you much. How much is being traded? How quickly? What about considerations such as quality and purity?
I'm no fan of the War on Drugs, either. I think it's done quite a lot of harm to the United States, as well as to the South American countries at the other end of the chain. But let's be intellectually honest: it's very, very difficult to gather enough hard facts about drug sales and usage to have a good sense for whether it's increasing or declining...and even harder to know whether law enforcement is a significant actor on the trend.
Remember that law enforcement was a significant intensifier of bootlegging during the Prohibition years...but we only found out about it well afterward!