"Existing laws don't work!"

I complain a lot about legislative efforts to impose more gun control, mainly because the biggest problem -- armed ex-convicts -- results from the non-enforcement of existing laws against criminals possessing guns. What good are laws if they are not enforced? What makes people think that more laws will result in more law enforcement if existing laws are not adequately enforced?

In the context of heightened airport security in the post-9/11 era, naturally I tend to assume that existing gun control laws are stringently enforced at airports. Right? Anyone caught trying to take a gun on a plane would, I assume, be facing serious consequences.

And naturally, someone trying to take a bomb on a plane would be, like, locked up for a while, right? At the very least, he'd be placed on a watch list and never be allowed on a plane again.

It's looking like my assumptions were all wrong.

According to Annie Jacobsen (author of Terror in The Skies, Why 9/11 Could Happen Again), a number of shoe bombers have been caught with explosive shoes including blasting caps embedded in the hollowed-out soles, and the authorities play catch and release, simply taking away their shoes and putting them on a later plane:

The sad truth is DHS and FBI intelligence analysts want airport screeners and their law enforcement counterparts to be on the lookout for shoe bombs. But when suspect shoes are found, DHS and FBI officials are not so interested in the people wearing the shoes. What this means is that we continue to look for bombs, not bombers. The policy is clear: catch and release.
This is going on in the evil fascist United States which waterboards terrorists as official policy? (Yes, all three of them....)

Sheesh.

All this time I thought it was a crime -- and a really serious crime -- to try to get on a plane with a bomb.

I'm sure someone will say that more laws needed.

Hmmm....

Maybe the problem is the proliferation of shoes. Especially the high-capacity thick-soled variety. Rather than allow people with sick souls to hollow out their thick soles, perhaps thick soles should be banned entirely. But it will be a major struggle, because the radical right wing libertarian fascists will no doubt shriek inanely that "when thick soles are outlawed, only outlaws will have thick souls!" So the laws are only a start. We need to look at the root cause of why this country causes people to develop sick souls in the first place.

I suspect they're being trampled underfoot by America's violent fascist libertarian footwear culture.

posted by Eric on 11.03.07 at 10:09 AM





TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://classicalvalues.com/cgi-bin/pings.cgi/5748






Comments

WTF? I mean, WTFingF? They find someone with an explosive in his shoe trying to get on a plane and the LET HIM GO? What, are they afraid of offending the shoe-bombing-American community now?

Anonymous   ·  November 3, 2007 04:32 PM

Anonymous,

If they jailed shoe-bomber suspects, they would have to let the casual drug users go. It's a choice between dealing with a common criminal, and a moral reprobate.

Eric,

Outlaws don't have sick souls, outlaws are thick* souls.

*As in lackwitted, dense.

(Running red lights is an offense where the nature of the penalty depends upon what's going through the intersection at right angles to you.)

Alan Kellogg   ·  November 3, 2007 05:39 PM

Post a comment

You may use basic HTML for formatting.





Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)



November 2007
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30  

ANCIENT (AND MODERN)
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR


Search the Site


E-mail




Classics To Go

Classical Values PDA Link



Archives




Recent Entries



Links



Site Credits