|
October 09, 2007
Petraeus a sycophant, claims former Khmer Rouge apologist
I regularly get startling emails, and one I received last night quotes a long argument -- titled "Petraeus out of step with US top brass" -- by an "analyst" named Gareth Porter who claims that General Petraeus was called a "sycophant" by Admiral William Fallon, chief of Centcom: WASHINGTON - In sharp contrast to the lionization of General David Petraeus by members of the US Congress during his testimony this week, Petraeus's superior, Admiral William Fallon, chief of the Central Command (Centcom), derided Petraeus as a sycophant during their first meeting in Baghdad in March, according to Pentagon sources familiar with reports of the meeting.Naturally, we have only Porter's word that Admiral Fallon said this. As it turns out, NRO's Cliff May was sent a link to the same story (although his link was from the leftie IPS site). Putting the phrase "news story" in quotes, May was most amused: Hey, I'm sure this must be true. No doubt IPS reporters have great military sources.Now my curiosity was really aroused. I wondered, if the "facts" are coming from Gareth Porter, how reliable is he? Via Wikipedia, I found a clue: In 1976-77, continuing his challenge to the bloodbath argument, Gareth Porter rejected early accounts of the mass killings by the Pol Pot regime in Cambodia. With George Hildebrand he wrote a book, Cambodia: Starvation and Revolution, which accepted the Pol Pot regime's rationale for the deportation of millions of people from Phnom Penh and other cities. Critics have argued that the book's sources included official statements by the Pol Pot regime. [4] Testifying before Congress in May 1977, Gareth Porter said that "the notion that the leadership of Democratic Kampuchea adopted a policy of physically eliminating whole classes of people" was "a myth fostered primarily by the authors of a Readers Digest book." [5] Senator Stephen J. Solarz was so shocked by this testimony that he compared Gareth Porter to those who deny the murder of 6 million Jews in the Nazi Holocaust. Gareth Porter rejected this comparison. [6]Porter later seems to have backed off his genocide denial, but as recently as August (in a piece titled "Bush's "Killing Fields" and the Real Lesson of Vietnam"), he was blaming the genocidal Khmer Rouge on the U.S. The Cambodia book mentioned in the Wiki entry is reviewed here: In 1976, Gareth Porter and George C. Hildebrand, both American scholars,3 published a small but significant book entitled Cambodia: Starvation and Revolution. It is important for two reasons. First, it was the first English-language book purporting to describe the events unfolding in Cambodia in 1975 and 1976. 4 Second, it rationalized everything the Khmer Rouge did and were doing: from the evacuation of Phnom Penh residents and hospital patients to the forcing of monks into hard labor. In the book, Porter and Hildebrand (hereafter P-H) offer what appears to be insurmountable evidence that contradicts reports of atrocities taking place in revolutionary Cambodia, re -christened Democratic Kampuchea.5Oh, I see. The Khmer Rouge tried to be good, and they were basically good until the evidence came in that they were bad, and then it was clear that Nixon made them do it. While I don't like to stick my neck out, right now I'm disinclined to believe Porter's uncorroborated hearsay about General Petraeus. posted by Eric on 10.09.07 at 10:57 AM
Comments
I doubt that Admiral Fallon would gratuitously insult an up-and-coming subordinate in this fashion. I'm sure he’s astute enough to realize that he could be reporting directly to General Petraeus one day (or indirectly reporting if Petraeus ever becomes his commander in chief). G. Weightman · October 9, 2007 07:35 PM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
November 2007
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
November 2007
October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSALLAMERICANGOP See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
We Had Better Get A Move On
bottling and selling morality A cock is a bull is a man, right? "Existing laws don't work!" "hellhole of empowered criminality" Best argument in Hillary's favor Barak Obama Pledges No fun allowed? (Not even with Thomas Ellers and Rick Ellensburg?) the slippery moral slope that slides both ways When skepticism becomes heresy
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Shouldn't "National Front for a United Kampuchea" be NFUK?