So I'm reading Stuart Taylor guest blogging over at The Volokh Conspiracy and one commenter notes that a previous guest blogger only lasted for two posts.
No disrespect to her but maybe she was unfamiliar with the level of discourse on the blogging medium?
Well yeah.
So my friend Eric at Classical Values makes a similar point today.
I'm convinced there has to be a blogging gene. I mean, who would do this voluntarily without pay, day in and day out? Think about it.
And then a bit earlier I had a couple of real charmers show up at this post: Conspiracy Theories. My attitude? Some of us enjoy the abuse.
So my motto is "Will blog for abuse. At least it increases the traffic." I'm in this for the abuse. Pile on.
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://classicalvalues.com/cgi-bin/pings.cgi/5534
Comments
I read those posts.
She would have been a great blogger. Just not at Volokh's.
Her posts would have fit right in at anti-Bush echo chambers like DU or Kos.
She had a serious case of Pauline Kael syndrome regarding the Iraq War/GWOT ('nobody I know thinks it could be justified!').
I think Eugene's libertarian leanings and Orin Kerr's Gonzales-bashing and Comey-pimping posts gave her the false impression that the commenters there would regard her as 'speaking truth to power'.
DerHanh · September 18, 2007 10:39 AM
I'm not real good at abuse, but I'll give it a try. You suck.
I read those posts.
She would have been a great blogger. Just not at Volokh's.
Her posts would have fit right in at anti-Bush echo chambers like DU or Kos.
She had a serious case of Pauline Kael syndrome regarding the Iraq War/GWOT ('nobody I know thinks it could be justified!').
I think Eugene's libertarian leanings and Orin Kerr's Gonzales-bashing and Comey-pimping posts gave her the false impression that the commenters there would regard her as 'speaking truth to power'.