|
May 06, 2007
Buying a book to spite the publisher?
I first heard about Mischa Berlinski's Fieldwork on a Glenn and Helen podcast in which they interviewed the author. Until today, I never bought the book, although the interview helped inspire a long post about Naga headhunters. Distracted by other things in the past couple of months, I had all but forgotten about the Berlinski book until yesterday, when I stumbled quite accidentally upon Stephen King's review of the book in "Entertainment Weekly." Book reviews don't usually make me mad (especially when the reviewer loves the book as much as King loved this one). But it wasn't the review that made me mad, it was reading about how the publisher undermined the book -- especially the reasons: Here's King: If this is such a good read, what's the bad news? That's easy. As of March 26, Fieldwork was No. 24,571 on the Amazon best-seller list, and not apt to go much higher. The reason why is illustrative of how the book biz became the invalid of the entertainment industry, and why fiction sales are down across the board (with the possible exception of chick lit). Critics, with their stubborn insistence that there's a difference between ''literature'' and ''popular fiction,'' are part of the problem, but the publishers themselves, who have bought into this elitist twaddle, are also to blame. Since we're talking Fieldwork, take Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Reading that was enough to make me buy a book I had forgotten to buy. Reading on made me want to write a post about it: I picked Fieldwork up because I saw interesting words on the flap (fascination, taboo, sexual), but when I think about how close I came to passing it by, I just get mad. As it was, I grabbed it on impulse, thinking: I know you don't want me to buy you, you dull-looking thing, but I'm going to. Just to spite you.So why would they give this excellent book such short shrift? Because some strange literary elite wants to be in charge of what constitutes literature? Sheesh. At the rate they're going, they'll do to writing what they've done to art. So I bought the book not only to support the author, but out of spite for the publisher (to say nothing the intellectually bankrupt literary elites who seem to be influencing them). Who knows? I might even get around to reading it. posted by Eric on 05.06.07 at 11:07 AM
Comments
Over at Baen Books they have been conducting this interesting experiment for a number of years now: giving away free material to sell more books. More correctly, giving away the digital content of older titles to have more dead-tree media sales. And the years of data now demonstrate that this works. Most books see an initial period of time of hot sales and then a trailing off as the sales decline and a very low level of sales thereafter. Free material spurs individuals on to *buy the book* so the plateau is much higher for follow-on sales. This is true of both established authors, like David Drake, and less well known ones, like John Dalmas. Put an old book's content out for *free* and sales will start to pick up. A single reprint cycle used to take a few years to run out the stock, while many of the books in the free library now go through *annual* print runs or even more frequent. Authors have seen increased residual royalties from this effect. That is the effect of people wanting to *own the book* not just *read the material*. Books still have many, many positives over the digital material, such as high resolution and not needing a power source, just enough reading light to read. No batteries to go out on you. Takes a bit of a battering and still has readable contents. Looks nice on a shelf next to *other books*. Cover art that is often very telling of what you will get or artwork in and of itself. Right now that is the Baen domain, until others learn how to finally give up this idea that it is the *book* that sells the material: it is the material that sells the book. ajacksonian · May 8, 2007 01:13 PM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
May 2007
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
May 2007
April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
RINOs Carnival Special V-E Day Edition
Fusion Image my selfish personal motivation disclosed the graying of kiddie porn? Buying a book to spite the publisher? making my remote vote emote Spare me the images while I try to think.... Where the bees are It Had An Unfortunate Gloating Tone "Little Darling"
Links
Site Credits
|
|
I'm still trying to understand why a publisher, who has a book that has sold out its original press run in months, refuses to a) reprint a new run or b) let the author buy back his/her rights if the publisher declines to do anything with them.