|
May 03, 2007
Why not end all deadly traffic?
Justin had a thought about AB 1634 (more infra -- here, here, here, here, and here) which seemed to merit a post all by itself. However, if I wait around for Justin to write it, AB 1634 may have been passed and signed into law. So I thought now would be a good time to share Justin's thoughts, as amplified and expounded upon by me. (Justin, FWIW, owns no animals of any kind, so he has no, um, dog in this, um, race.) Anyway, it struck Justin that spaying and neutering all dogs because a minority of dog owners won't control theirs was a lot like enacting prohibition because of alcoholism, drunken driving, and drinking by minors. Good point. And I suppose drunk driving could also be curtailed by a moratorium on the issuance of drivers licenses. For that matter, why not just eliminate the proliferation of cars? Now, if we apply the AB1634 model, the sponsors would have to first declare that there was a severe "car overpopulation crisis" (there is), that it causes "traffic" (it does), and that many cars end up being abandoned by their owners (they do), that they therefore often have to be impounded at taxpayers' expense (how true!). And that tragically, many of these impounded vehicles are "unwanted" and never find new owners, and have to be destroyed! The sponsors of the "Healthy Car Initiative" could simply require that all existing cars would have to be rendered incapable of highway travel, and that no new cars could be manufactured except for rare, certified collectors cars, along with specially built cars to be used at NASCAR events. Any such cars could not be sold or licensed in the future unless they were "neutered" in such a manner as to prevent their ever being used on the highways. True, there'd still be plenty of cars in private hands, but there'd be fewer and fewer over time. Let's turn to cars as a public health issue. By any standard, the public health would benefit far more by getting rid of cars than by getting rid of dogs. Cars killed 4225 Californians just last year, while dogs killed only 30 Californians in the entire period of 1979-1995. Considering that California has around 24 million cars, and 8-10 million dogs, it becomes clear that cars are a far, far, more significant public health issue than dogs -- and by an enormous ratio. So what are we waiting for? Why isn't Lloyd Levine turning off the larger spigot? posted by Eric on 05.03.07 at 07:47 PM
Comments
Shhhhh, Please don't give Levine any ideas!! He has already stated that he thinks The State is better able to decide what is good than it's citizens,and we all know how the California legistature feels about cars! We will all be afoot! (and petless!) flicka47 · May 4, 2007 02:09 AM If compared to guns, cars are much more likley to kill or injure someone. Hugh · May 4, 2007 11:33 AM What about all the sexually transmitted diseases and unwanted children what is the cost to public heath and the tax payer ? Anonymous · May 4, 2007 01:55 PM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
May 2007
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
May 2007
April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
massive social engineering to combat bureaucratic inconvenience?
Why not end all deadly traffic? Illegal Numbers? A choice with a weird echo Military Censorship There oughta be a law! My endlessly incestuous and endlessly repetitive arguments.... about endlessly incestuous and endlessly repetitive topics.... every endlessly incestuous and endlessly repetitive day.... To some people, freedom is a leaky pipe Racist history of dog control? Different standards for different "communities"?
Links
Site Credits
|
|
That is just brilliant!