|
May 03, 2007
Illegal Numbers?
Is 09 f9 11 02 9d 74 f3 5b d8 41 56 c5 63 56 99 bf an illegal hex number? Nope. I made a transcription error. So what is all the excitement? Inquiring minds want to know. THE MPAA is having a go at erasing the fairly public HD-DVD processing key number from the Interweb.This is all about keeping secrets which can't be kept and making copies which are not copies. It is all about preventing copies from being made where copies must be made. It is all about violating the laws of nature. I discuss some of that and have links to a lot of good information on copy protection schemes in New Vistas which is about the copy protection schemes in Microsoft's Vista operating system. Well any way it has the folks at digg up in arms. It has Charles at Little Green Footballs up in arms about "theft" of intellectual propery. How is it theft if you figure it out on your own or some one tells you? I'm still working out that one. As one commenter after another has pointed out encrypting an object and then decoding it on a given machine makes the encryption key vulnerable to the owner of the machine. The key will be somewhere on the machine. Even if it isn't, comparing the encoded data with the decoded data allows the key to be teased out. The system has more holes than swiss cheese. In addition in order to make the software distributable you have to have the same key for every disk if the disc is not coded for a specific user. You have to wonder how the MPAA or the RIAA or any of the other royalty collectors hoped to get away with this one. Let me leave you with the music maker's lament about coyright: "Why should I let my fans steal from me when the record companies already do such a good job?" Here is a band doing something about it Stuck Mojo. You can listen to one of their tunes "Open Season" for free on Youtube. They are giving their music away. Not just one song either. A whole album. The Stuck Mojo link above explains how to get free music without risking a lawsuit. I might note, as a long time Dead Head, that the Grateful Dead pioneered free music. Going so far as to provide those with tape recorders live feeds from their shows in an area called the "taper's section". Cross Posted at Power and Control posted by Simon on 05.03.07 at 07:25 PM
Comments
A word to the wise: The correct number was hidden in the post. In plain sight (sort of). Can you digg it? In any case if they came after us I wanted to see if we had a case by showing that it was an incorrect number. If we could win such a case we could gloat by saying "sorry, wrong number". M. Simon · May 3, 2007 09:11 PM Here's another consideration. It costs money to file a lawsuit. Just to file. There's the filing fee, and the cost of the lawyer who files the suit. Multiply that by the millions of potential cases and the MPAA faces huge loses. The MPAA's business model is flawed here. They shouldn't be trying to stop file sharing, but encouraging purchase by encouraging the entertainment industry to make purchases worthwhile. They also need to remember that movies etc. are a bitch to send over the web. Even with cable access. Or even most but the higher end ISDN connections. For most people it is far easier, and less costly, to buy the product for showing at home. What file sharing can do is give a potential customer a taste of what's in store, and thus encourage purchase or rental. The only true reliable way to cut down on piracy is through value added measures. Adding to the experience and to the package. At $50.00 an inkjet cartridge printing out a lobby poster can be pricey. Alan Kellogg · May 3, 2007 10:39 PM I think I can di99 it. Eric Scheie · May 4, 2007 03:02 PM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
May 2007
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
May 2007
April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
We Will Get All Industrial On Them
massive social engineering to combat bureaucratic inconvenience? Why not end all deadly traffic? Illegal Numbers? A choice with a weird echo Military Censorship There oughta be a law! My endlessly incestuous and endlessly repetitive arguments.... about endlessly incestuous and endlessly repetitive topics.... every endlessly incestuous and endlessly repetitive day.... To some people, freedom is a leaky pipe Racist history of dog control?
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Well, I'm not sure I agree with everything I read, but it strikes me that
09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
might be more accurate than what you said, and also I'm pretty sure that
md5(?????) = d1af2e56517a7202a1cc087a69c4e296
But you know, it's just an opinion.
Others may disagree!
Are we no longer allowed to venture opinions?
Does it matter whether I have any idea what I'm talking about?