|
|
|
May 03, 2007
There oughta be a law!
And if I wasn't such a silly libertarian, I'd want something done about people who annoy me by asking me for money! A good example was an email I got earlier from ebay, cleverly designed to make it appear that I had just bought something, even though I hadn't. While it was only a minor annoyance, I dashed off an angry email to a friend: While junk email and spam are irritating enough, there's something especially irritating about getting it from ebay -- especially when the subject line "ScreenName, you bought this on eBay" makes it seem important.And, as was made abundantly clear in the advertisement, these people wanted my money! I thought it over and I wondered whether it's really enough to merely not like the fact that there are people who want what belongs to me. If I wasn't a libertarian, I think I should want to do something about it. Like a law, perhaps? Before laughing this off, bear in mind that the idea that it is wrong to want someone's money is not new. In fact, it goes to the heart of morality, it was written into the Ten Commandents, and it boils down to four words: Thou shalt not covet. While I could write a satirical essay about enacting the Tenth Commandment into law, I have yet to meet anyone -- sane or insane -- who would suggest it be made illegal to want what someone else has. But if I wasn't a libertarian, what a wonderful feeling it would be to know I could call the cops every time someone asked me for money -- whether in person or in an advertisement. Actually, coveting has been criminalized from time to time -- a notorious recent example being Khmer Rouge Cambodia. But this was not based on biblical law, and I have been unable to find a single example of any government which actually wrote the Tenth Commandment into an enforceable law. If I have missed one, please enlighten me. For now, I'll stick my neck out and venture that enacting the Tenth Commandment into law would be in direct opposition to American law and culture: The last Commandment for Jews and Protestants (which forms the last two commandments for Catholics and Lutherans) is an admonition against coveting. This text illustrates yet one more way in which the Ten Commandments are antithetical to the American legal and cultural experience. The King James Version of the Bible of this text says "Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's house, . . . Nor anything that is thy neighbour's [sic]." This Commandment seems to stand in opposition to a capitalist, consumer culture that has long been at the root of American life. Whole industries - advertising, automobiles, clothing, and cosmetics - are predicated on the idea of wanting what your neighbor has. Americans learn from an early age to "covet they neighbour's house" and two huge industries, real estate and home building, thrive because of this. We even have a tax code that subsidizes this covetousness. "Keeping up with the Joneses" is a tried and true aspect of American culture. The prohibition on envy found at the end of the Commandments may be an ethical goal of Judaism and Christianity, but it can hardly be seen as part of the foundation of either American law or culture.A lot of what we call morality involves what I'd call shoulds. Ideals and principles by which we'd be well advised to live our lives. I've often wondered whether the Tenth Commandment is there as a reminder -- not of law, but as a reminder that there are limits to law. As to the idea that not all matters of right and wrong are proper subjects for human legislation, I happen to agree with that idea -- regardless of whether it came from God. posted by Eric on 05.03.07 at 12:10 PM
Comments
No, it's not phishing. It's from ebay, and I verified the links. I've never gotten junk like this from ebay before, and at the bottom it says this: "eBay sent this e-mail to you because your Notification Preferences indicate that you want to receive information about Special Events & Promotions." I've been using ebay since 2000 and I've never gotten an email like this until today. So I had to change settings by going through my preference settings and "unchecking" a whole slew of boxes that I don't remember being there to check when I first signed on in 2000. (I routinely refuse such "notification offers.") Things like this have a way of just appearing, and I think ebay is more and more engaged in aggressive marketing tactics. Frankly (while I can't prove my suspicions), I'm concerned that some high volume ebay sellers may be selling customer lists, and this might account for some of the irresistibly low priced items. The names and contact information of buyers may be of more value than a discount on an item. Some things aren't necessarily as cheap as they look. You think that's bad? Try donating to charity. You'll never hear the end of it. Eric Scheie · May 3, 2007 02:14 PM I have to disagree that all advertisement is coveting. Done properly, advertising is education. I also agree that "keeping up with the Jones'" is coveting and I think that advertising that focuses on that aspect is encouraging coveting. But not all advertising. Not even most. _Jon · May 3, 2007 03:20 PM Coveting is a little different than "keeping up with the Jones". That would be wanting something like what the Jones own. Coveting is to desire that individual object(or person), not something similar or even better! flicka47 · May 3, 2007 04:57 PM You don't need a law. Just report the e-mail's to the appropriate place: Ebay Spoof M. Simon · May 3, 2007 07:30 PM Ebay Spoof , Paypal Spoof , BTW I'd report it as a spoof. Create some internal friction. M. Simon · May 3, 2007 07:33 PM Ebay Spoof Paypal Spoof M. Simon · May 3, 2007 07:34 PM Hmmm, I got one of those emails from eBay today too. I guess I should go un-check all of those boxes now... jan · May 3, 2007 10:05 PM Speaking of people asking for your money... Go to Mythusmage Opines. Scroll down and on the right side you will find a PayPal button. Click on that button and you will be sent to my donation form. Enter whatever amount you wish, so long as it's at least $5.00 U. S., and click on "submit". Your donation will be applied to the purchase of a new iMac. That is the only promise I make, and it is a promise I can keep. Donate generously, and always remember to deal with people who are upfront about what they're doing. Alan Kellogg · May 3, 2007 10:49 PM I agree with flicka47 (04:57 PM) on the meaning of "covet". For most of human history, there were no mass produced goods available. The only way to get what someone else had was to take it. In this sense, "coveting" is a direct precursor of stealing--the eighth commandment. MBrown · May 4, 2007 01:37 PM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
May 2007
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
May 2007
April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
• massive social engineering to combat bureaucratic inconvenience?
• Why not end all deadly traffic? • Illegal Numbers? • A choice with a weird echo • Military Censorship • There oughta be a law! • My endlessly incestuous and endlessly repetitive arguments.... about endlessly incestuous and endlessly repetitive topics.... every endlessly incestuous and endlessly repetitive day.... • To some people, freedom is a leaky pipe • Racist history of dog control? • Different standards for different "communities"?
Links
Site Credits
|
|
I've never seen eBay send such an email.
Sure it wasn't some Phisher pretending to be eBay?
(Or, rather, I assume it was, but that wasn't expressed clearly in the post?)