|
May 05, 2007
It Had An Unfortunate Gloating Tone
KC Johnson at Durham in Wonderland is discussing hate mail. Specifically hate mail recieved by some of the professors involved in the Duke Hoax. The latest example of creatively interpreting what constitutes "harassing" e-mails comes from the newly elected chairwoman of the Academic Council, Paula ("No to Due Process") McClain. A Free Republic reader sent two emails to McClain. The first asked for comment about the end of the case; the second said that she had been "hoisted on the petard of Political Correctness, racial identity politics, gender determining feminism and what [the writer] coined as 'Tawana Brawley Syndrome'."Yeah KC. I loved it too! Cross Posted at Power and Control and at The Astute Bloggers posted by Simon on 05.05.07 at 08:50 AM |
|
May 2007
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
May 2007
April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Where the bees are
It Had An Unfortunate Gloating Tone "Little Darling" Abortion of unwanted fetuses is good. But euthanasia of unwanted dogs is bad. We Will Get All Industrial On Them massive social engineering to combat bureaucratic inconvenience? Why not end all deadly traffic? Illegal Numbers? A choice with a weird echo Military Censorship
Links
Site Credits
|
|
So now they're defining 'hate e-mails', which no doubt in the mind of the profs receiving them constitute 'hate crimes', down to sarcasm?
If that rule were applied equally across the ideological spectrum, couldn't Pres. Bush throw just about every stand up comic, sinistral blogger, and many liberal arts prof into jail?