Terrorists as Equal Opportunity Martyrs?

E at the Dave, responding to one of the single most offensive pieces of post-9-11 relativist drivel I've seen, gives "cultural studies" darling Terry Eagleton a dose of righteous indignation that's worth reading.

Notice that Eagleton starts right in with "insurgents." At my favorite blog the Bleat, James Lileks shows us the term "terrorist" in use in 1937, long before Reuters *ahem* altered the discourse, adding this:

It’s almost jarring to see the word “TERRORIST” in 1937, since we think that belongs to the post 1972-Olympics world, perhaps. And it’s enlightening to read about violence and bloodshed and the usual cycle o’ violence instigated, in this example, by the publication of a commission’s recommendation to partition the area.

No doubt they were reacting to the future occupation of the West Bank.

posted by Dennis on 01.27.05 at 09:48 PM





TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://classicalvalues.com/cgi-bin/pings.cgi/1944



Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Terrorists as Equal Opportunity Martyrs?:

» Miscellanea - I'm at a Loss Edition from Decision '08
Terry Eagleton waxes poetic over the beautiful art of the suicide bomber (I'm not joking) (hat tip to Classical Values)... [Read More]
Tracked on January 28, 2005 07:55 PM



Comments

I have had it with terrorists and their apologists.

And, everybody, please stop calling them martyrs. A martyr is somebody who is tortured, executed, killed, nailed to a cross, flayed alive, burned at the stake, torn on the rack, etc., because he or she refuses to renounce a belief.

If you kill yourself, jump off a bridge, take poison, shoot yourself, blow yourself up, etc., then you are a suicide. If you kill somebody else other than in defense of self, family, or country, then you are a murderer. If you murder random strangers just to make a political point, then you are a ------[fisk]ing terrorist, and, as far as I'm concerned, you can [fisk] off and rot in Hell. I have zero sympathy for terrorists and zero respect for their -------[fisk]ing apologists. Harsh, I know. That's the way I am.

You and Lileks (among others) have chosen to deliberately ignore a critical piece of information (which you would come to understand should you have occaision to actually read Terry Eagleton): actions have consequences. Decades of US foreign policy in the Mideast - including the support of imperial genocide, plutocracy, kleptocracy, torture, and all-out theft of resources has resulted in an awesomely huge and pervasive network of terror cells bent on destroying the West. The West MADE this enemy. Why is it so hard to understand that if we stop making enemies we STOP MAKING ENEMIES?

blogesota   ·  January 28, 2005 02:25 PM

Because you don't stop making enemies. Sometimes, someone just wants to steal your shit. Sometimes, some people just want to kill you.

Nations don't have freinds. Nations have interests. We should not apologize for advancing those interests. Like it or not, unless you live in a fucking cave, make your own clothes and hunt for your own food, you are dependent on cheap oil for your survival. As are we all. Why is that so hard for you to understand?

João   ·  January 28, 2005 03:45 PM

Thank you João, that was well said.

Blogesota, if U.S. hegemony is as evil, ruthless, acquisitive and violent as you maintain, one question inescapably raises itself. Why are they FUCKING with us?

For them, it can only end in tears. I have no illusions about what my government is capable of. They shouldn't either.

But I don't believe your perceptions are accurate.
You see all the bad we've done and little or none of the good.

J. Case   ·  January 28, 2005 10:32 PM


December 2006
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31            

ANCIENT (AND MODERN)
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR


Search the Site


E-mail




Classics To Go

Classical Values PDA Link



Archives




Recent Entries



Links



Site Credits